INTEROPERABLE KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION IN CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS FOR REHABILITATION

International standards and standard proposals of nomenclatures, ontologies and information models exist in medicine, but the scope of most of them is overly general to cope with the specificities that characterize rehabilitation. Here we carry out an ontology-based exploration of the concepts and relationships in the rehabilitation domain, integrating clinical practice, the clinical investigator record ontology and international standards. The aim of the analysis is to identify potential logical problems with the use of existing models and international standards in representing and reasoning with real clinical data, and to understand whether and how these data might be defined more formally than in the current practice. Our analysis of the relationships among rehabilitation concepts revealed issues related to confusion among classes and their properties, incorrect classifications, overlaps and loss of information. It also suggested properties that should be included in a formal model suitable to be used by decision support

[1]  John F. Sowa,et al.  Knowledge representation: logical, philosophical, and computational foundations , 2000 .

[2]  E. Mpofu,et al.  Rehabilitation and health assessment: Applying ICF guidelines , 2010 .

[3]  Cédric Bousquet,et al.  Using the CEN/ISO Standard for Categorial Structure to Harmonise the , 2009, MIE.

[4]  Nenad Kostanjsek,et al.  ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[5]  J. Cimino Desiderata for Controlled Medical Vocabularies in the Twenty-First Century , 1998, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[6]  A. Rector,et al.  Foundations for an Electronic Medical Record , 1991, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[7]  Vincenzo Della Mea,et al.  An ontology-based exploration of the concepts and relationships in the activities and participation component of the international classification of functioning, disability and health , 2012, J. Biomed. Semant..

[8]  Hajar Kashfi,et al.  The intersection of clinical decision support and electronic health record: A literature review , 2011, 2011 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS).

[9]  Thomas Ewert,et al.  Linking health-status measurements to the international classification of functioning, disability and health. , 2002, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[10]  Kevin Donnelly,et al.  SNOMED-CT: The advanced terminology and coding system for eHealth. , 2006, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[11]  Boris Motik,et al.  Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web , 2008 .

[12]  Sam Heard,et al.  An Ontology-based Model of Clinical Information , 2007, MedInfo.

[13]  Catalina Martínez-Costa,et al.  An approach for the semantic interoperability of ISO EN 13606 and OpenEHR archetypes , 2010, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[14]  Laia Subirats,et al.  An Ontology for Computer-Based Decision Support in Rehabilitation , 2011, MICAI.