ICIS 2008 Panel Report: IS Has Outgrown the Need for Reference Discipline Theories, or Has It?

We view the current state of reference discipline theory dominance in the MIS field as constituting a hegemony. This panel discussion will examine why this has potential harm. In counterpoint, we will present the argument that reference discipline theory use should continue. Aside from the fact that reference discipline theory is used, there are benefits derived from it which should be acknowledged and, perhaps such use should be encouraged and broadened. Additionally, we will present perspectives regarding alternatives to reference discipline theory aimed at building and expanding indigenous IS theory.

[1]  Peter G. W. Keen,et al.  Mis Research: Reference disciplines and a Cumulative Tradition , 1980, ICIS.

[2]  Varun Grover,et al.  A Citation Analysis of the Evolution and State of Information Systems within a Constellation of Reference Disciplines , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Mark Keil,et al.  Theorizing in information systems research: A reflexive analysis of the adaptation of theory in information systems research , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[4]  P. Godfrey‐Smith.  Theory and Reality , 2003 .

[5]  W ZmudRobert,et al.  The identity crisis within the is discipline , 2003 .

[6]  B. Latour.  Science in Action , 1987 .

[7]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Power, politics, and MIS implementation , 1987, CACM.

[8]  D. Mumby.  Power and Politics , 2001 .

[9]  Marianne W. Lewis,et al.  Metatriangulation: Building Theory from Multiple Paradigms , 1999 .

[10]  P. T. Mountjoy,et al.  Science in History , 1969, Nature.

[11]  T. Kuhn.  The structure of scientific revolutions, 3rd ed. , 1996 .

[12]  John B. Miner,et al.  The Rated Importance, Scientific Validity, and Practical Usefulness of Organizational Behavior Theories: A Quantitative Review , 2003 .

[13]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Information Systems as a Reference Discipline , 2002, MIS Q..

[14]  Jesper B. Sørensen,et al.  The interplay between theory and method , 2007 .

[15]  J. Pearl.  Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference , 2000 .

[16]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  Building theory in the sciences of the artificial , 2009, DESRIST.

[17]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Identity Crisis Within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline's Core Properties , 2003, MIS Q..

[18]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[19]  R. Nolan,et al.  Managing the Four Stages of EDP Growth , 1974 .

[20]  J. Passmore,et al.  Logical positivism (I) , 1943 .

[21]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[22]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Using Paradox to Build Management and Organization Theories , 1989 .

[23]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  Lessons from the Trenches of Metatriangulation Research , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[24]  C. Hempel.  Philosophy of Natural Science , 1966 .

[25]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Attitudinal and normative variables as predictors of specific behavior. , 1973 .

[26]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[27]  Deborah Bunker,et al.  Australian Eclecticism and Theorezing in Information Systems Research , 2007, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  Power and Information Technology Research: A Metatriangulation Review , 2002, MIS Q..

[29]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[30]  H. Simon,et al.  The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.) , 1996 .

[31]  J. Gribbin.  Science: A History 1543-2001 , 2002 .

[32]  S. Strasser,et al.  Understanding and explanation : basic ideas concerning the humanity of the human sciences , 1985 .

[33]  Ray J. Paul,et al.  Editor's View: an opportunity for editors of IS journals to relate their experiences and offer advice. The Editorial View of Ray J Paul. First in a series , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[34]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Anatomy of a Design Theory , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[35]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[36]  Daniel L. Sherrell,et al.  Communications of the Association for Information Systems , 1999 .

[37]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  The Legacy of "Power and Politics" in Disciplinary Discourse: A Citation Analysis , 2006, ICIS.

[38]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Crisis in the IS Field? A Critical Reflection on the State of the Discipline , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[39]  Fred Niederman,et al.  DSS theory: A model of constructs and relationships , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..