Semi‐analytical far field model for three‐dimensional finite‐element analysis

A challenging computational problem arises when a discrete structure (e.g. foundation) interacts with an unbounded medium (e.g. deep soil deposit), particularly if general loading conditions and non‐linear material behaviour is assumed. In this paper, a novel method for dealing with such a problem is formulated by combining conventional three‐dimensional finite‐elements with the recently developed scaled boundary finite‐element method. The scaled boundary finite‐element method is a semi‐analytical technique based on finite‐elements that obtains a symmetric stiffness matrix with respect to degrees of freedom on a discretized boundary. The method is particularly well suited to modelling unbounded domains as analytical solutions are found in a radial co‐ordinate direction, but, unlike the boundary‐element method, no complex fundamental solution is required. A technique for coupling the stiffness matrix of bounded three‐dimensional finite‐element domain with the stiffness matrix of the unbounded scaled boundary finite‐element domain, which uses a Fourier series to model the variation of displacement in the circumferential direction of the cylindrical co‐ordinate system, is described. The accuracy and computational efficiency of the new formulation is demonstrated through the linear elastic analysis of rigid circular and square footings. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  A. Deeks,et al.  Scaled boundary finite‐element analysis of a non‐homogeneous axisymmetric domain subjected to general loading , 2003 .

[2]  James Doherty,et al.  Scaled boundary finite‐element analysis of a non‐homogeneous elastic half‐space , 2003 .

[3]  Andrew Deeks,et al.  Potential flow around obstacles using the scaled boundary finite‐element method , 2003 .

[4]  S. Kocak,et al.  A combined finite element based soil–structure interaction model for large-scale systems and applications on parallel platforms , 2002 .

[5]  John P. Wolf,et al.  Stress recovery and error estimation for the scaled boundary finite‐element method , 2002 .

[6]  J. Wolf,et al.  A virtual work derivation of the scaled boundary finite-element method for elastostatics , 2002 .

[7]  John P. Wolf,et al.  The scaled boundary finite-element method : a fundamental solution-less boundary-element method , 2001 .

[8]  Chongmin Song,et al.  The scaled boundary finite-element method – alias consistent infinitesimal finite element cell method – for diffusion , 1999 .

[9]  M. Holzinger,et al.  Finite-element modelling of unbounded media , 1997 .

[10]  D. V. Griffiths,et al.  Programming the finite element method , 1982 .

[11]  Edward L. Wilson,et al.  Structural analysis of axisymmetric solids. , 1965 .

[12]  J. Wolf,et al.  On modelling unbounded saturated poroelastic soil with the scaled boundary finite-element method , 2001 .

[13]  Cong Luan Ngo-Tran The analysis of offshore foundations subjected to combined loading , 1996 .

[14]  Mark Randolph,et al.  Axisymmetric Time‐Domain Transmitting Boundaries , 1994 .

[15]  Ross Wesley Bell,et al.  The analysis of offshore foundations subjected to combined loading , 1991 .

[16]  G. Beer,et al.  IMPLEMENTATION OF COMBINED BOUNDARY ELEMENT-FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS WITH APPLICATIONS IN GEOMECHANICS. , 1986 .

[17]  O. Zienkiewicz,et al.  The coupling of the finite element method and boundary solution procedures , 1977 .

[18]  H. Poulos,et al.  Elastic solutions for soil and rock mechanics , 1973 .

[19]  J. Wolf,et al.  An h‐hierarchical adaptive procedure for the scaled boundary finite‐element method , 2022 .