Crossflow microfiltration of recombinant Escherichia coli lysates after high pressure homogenization.

Crossflow membrane filtration was used to process recombinant Escherichia coli cell lysates containing protein inclusion bodies after high pressure homogenization. The number of passes through the high pressure homogenizer changed the viscosities and average particle sizes of the cell lysates. The different cell lysates were processed with a hollow fiber unit containing microfiltration membranes and a plate and frame unit with either ultrafiltration or microfiltration membranes. There were differences in permeate flux and protein transmission for the various membranes with the best performing membranes giving permeate fluxes greater than 60 L m(-2) h(-1) and protein transmissions greater than 90%. For a given membrane, no differences were observed between the cell lysates following homogenization with one, two, and three passes at 83 MPa. The lack of a difference between the three lysates is due to their similarities with respect to the released macromolecules and the presence of small (<0.1 microm) cell debris.

[1]  P. Blum,et al.  Improved Homogenization of Recombinant Escherichia coli following Pretreatment with Guanidine Hydrochloride , 1995, Biotechnology progress.

[2]  F. J. Bailey,et al.  Influence of strain and medium composition on filtration of escherichia coli suspensions. , 1994, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[3]  M. Meagher,et al.  Extraction of rIL‐2 inclusion bodies from Escherichia coli using cross‐flow filtration , 1994, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[4]  N J Titchener-Hooker,et al.  A Study of Process Interactions between Cell Disruption and Debris Clarification Stages in the Recovery of Yeast Intracellular Products , 1993, Biotechnology progress.

[5]  A. Zydney,et al.  The influence of protein aggregates on the fouling of microfiltration membranes during stirred cell filtration , 1993 .

[6]  R. Schneider,et al.  Cake resistance and solute rejection in bacterial microfiltration: The role of the extracellular matrix , 1993 .

[7]  K. Nakanishi,et al.  Factors affecting the performance of crossflow filtration of yeast cell suspension , 1993, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[8]  Q. Gan,et al.  Properties of microfiltration membranes: Flux loss during constant pressure permeation of bovine serum albumin , 1991, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[9]  Anton P. J. Middelberg,et al.  A novel technique for the measurement of disruption in high‐pressure homogenization: Studies on E. coli containing recombinant inclusion bodies , 1991, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[10]  S. Enfors,et al.  Characterization of E. coli cell disintegrates from a bead mill and high pressure homogenizers , 1990, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[11]  G. Dorin,et al.  Fractionation of Recombinant Tumor Necrosis Factor Using Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Membranes , 1990, Biotechnology progress.

[12]  Jan L. Nilsson Protein fouling of uf membranes: Causes and consequences , 1990 .

[13]  Juan A. Asenjo,et al.  Separation Processes in Biotechnology , 1990 .

[14]  S. M. Forman,et al.  Crossflow filtration for the separation of inclusion bodies from soluble proteins in recombinant escherichia coli cell lysate , 1990 .

[15]  M. Kula,et al.  Tangential filtration of microbial suspensions: filtration resistances and model development , 1989 .

[16]  G. Belfort,et al.  Cross‐flow membrane microfiltration of a bacteriol fermentation broth , 1989, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[17]  Wei-Ming Lu,et al.  Selective Particle Deposition in Crossflow Filtration , 1989 .

[18]  M. S. Le,et al.  Fouling of microporous membranes in biological applications , 1989 .

[19]  K. Kroner,et al.  Improved Dynamic Filtration of Microbial Suspensions , 1987, Bio/Technology.

[20]  M. Kula,et al.  Purification of Proteins and the Disruption of Microbial Cells , 1987 .

[21]  F. Marston The purification of eukaryotic polypeptides synthesized in Escherichia coli. , 1986, The Biochemical journal.

[22]  E. Drioli,et al.  Membranes and Membrane Processes , 1986 .

[23]  P. Ward,et al.  The separation of aryl acylamidase by cross flow microfiltration and the significance of enzyme/cell debris interaction☆ , 1984 .

[24]  P. Ward,et al.  Microbial asparaginase recovery by membrane processes , 1984 .

[25]  J. Woodrow,et al.  Investigation of the parameters affecting the separation of bacterial enzymes from cell debris by tangential flow filtration , 1984 .

[26]  M. M. Bradford A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. , 1976, Analytical biochemistry.

[27]  U. K. Laemmli,et al.  Cleavage of Structural Proteins during the Assembly of the Head of Bacteriophage T4 , 1970, Nature.

[28]  Richard J. Wakeman,et al.  Understanding flux decline in crossflow microfiltration. Part 1 - Effects of particle and pore size , 1993 .

[29]  K. Hwang,et al.  Studies on the mechanism of cross-flow filtration , 1993 .

[30]  Richard J. Wakeman,et al.  Understanding flux decline in crossflow microfiltration. I: Effects of particle and pore size : Particle processing , 1993 .

[31]  Horst Chmiel,et al.  Separation efficiency of membranes in biotechnology: an experimental and mathematical study of flux control , 1992 .

[32]  M. Kula,et al.  Combination of enzymatic and/or thermal pretreatment with mechanical cell disintegration , 1992 .

[33]  Robert H. Davis Modeling of Fouling of Crossflow Microfiltration Membranes , 1992 .

[34]  J. S. Dennis,et al.  Combined chemical and mechanical processes for the disruption of bacteria. , 1991, Bioseparation.

[35]  P. F. Levy,et al.  Pilot-scale membrane filtration process for the recovery of an extracellular bacterial protease , 1990 .

[36]  C R Engler,et al.  Cell disruption by homogenizer. , 1990, Bioprocess technology.

[37]  Pamela Knight,et al.  Downstream Processing , 2008 .

[38]  M. Kula,et al.  Effects of Antifoams on Cross-flow Filtration of Microbial Suspensions , 1986 .

[39]  R. Gabler,et al.  Processing cell lysate with tangential flow filtration , 1985 .

[40]  Anthony G. Fane,et al.  Factors affecting flux in crossflow filtration , 1985 .

[41]  S. Builder,et al.  Downstream processing of proteins. , 1983, Biotechnology advances.