To assess the need for routinely submitting three stool samples per patient for recovery of enteric parasites, we reviewed the records of our parasitology laboratory for 1985-87 to determine the number of parasites that would not have been detected if only one or two samples had been submitted. A total of 16% of all stool samples were positive. For each sample that was positive for a parasite (index sample) a search was done for other stool samples, positive or negative, received from the same patient within 6 days of reception of the index sample. We identified 676 sets of two (276) or three (400) samples of which at least 1 was positive. A total of 93% of the enteric parasites were detected in the first sample in the two-sample sets. Among the three-sample sets 90% of the parasites were detected in the first sample, 8% in the second and 2% in the third. We recommend waiting for the result from the first stool sample rather than routinely submitting three samples for recovery of enteric parasites.
[1]
R. Ko.
Current Concepts in Parasitology
,
1990
.
[2]
Nathan C. Sheffield,et al.
Cost containment of formalin-preserved stool specimens for ova and parasites from outpatients
,
1988,
Journal of clinical microbiology.
[3]
G. Montessori,et al.
Searching for parasites in stool: once is usually enough.
,
1987,
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.
[4]
L. Jokipii,et al.
PREPATENCY OF GIARDIASIS
,
1977,
The Lancet.
[5]
E. C. Faust,et al.
The Probability of detecting Intestinal Protozoa by Successive Stool Examinations.
,
1942
.