Screening for Patent Quality: Examination, Fees, and the Courts

We develop an integrated framework to study how governments can improve the quality of patent screening. We focus on four key policy instruments: patent office examination, pre- and post-grant fees, and challenges in the courts. We show that there are important complementarities among these instruments, and identify conditions under which they can be used to achieve either partial or complete screening. We simulate the model to study the welfare effects of different policy reforms. We show that intensifying patent office examination, frontloading patent fees and capping litigation costs all generate welfare gains, while replacing examination with a pure registration system reduces welfare.

[1]  Mark A. Schankerman,et al.  Patents and Cumulative Innovation: Causal Evidence from the Courts , 2013 .

[2]  Mark A. Lemley Rational Ignorance at the Patent Office , 2001 .

[3]  Michael D. Frakes,et al.  Is the Time Allocated to Review Patent Applications Inducing Examiners to Grant Invalid Patents?: Evidence from Micro-Level Application Data , 2014 .

[4]  Mark A. Lemley,et al.  Understanding the Realities of Modern Patent Litigation , 2014 .

[5]  Carl Shapiro,et al.  Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard Setting , 2000, Innovation Policy and the Economy.

[6]  Mark Schankerman,et al.  Protecting Intellectual Property Rights: Are Small Firms Handicapped?* , 2004, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[7]  Matthew F. Mitchell,et al.  Innovation Variety and Patent Breadth , 2001 .

[8]  M. Heller,et al.  Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research , 1998, Science.

[9]  Rochelle Cooper Dreyfuss NONOBVIOUSNESS: A COMMENT ON THREE LEARNED PAPERS , 2008 .

[10]  B. Caillaud,et al.  Patent office in innovation policy: Nobody's perfect , 2011 .

[11]  Mark A. Lemley,et al.  Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 19, Number 2—Spring 2005—Pages 75–98 Probabilistic Patents , 2022 .

[12]  Vidya Atal,et al.  Patent Quality and a Two-Tiered Patent System , 2013 .

[13]  J. Choi Patent Litigation as an Information Transmission Mechanism , 1998 .

[14]  E. S.,et al.  Why most patents are invalid – Extent , reasons , and potential remedies of patent invalidity , 2015 .

[15]  Rebecca S. Eisenberg,et al.  Obvious to Whom? Evaluating Inventions from the Perspective of PHOSITA , 2004 .

[16]  Robert P. Merges,et al.  Incentives to Challenge and Defend Patents: Why Litigation Won't Reliably Fix Patent Office Errors and Why Administrative Patent Review Might Help , 2004 .

[17]  Claude Crampes,et al.  Litigation and Settlement in Patent Infringement Cases , 2002 .

[18]  P. Klemperer How Broad Should the Scope of Patent Protection Be , 1990 .

[19]  F. Schuett Patent quality and incentives at the patent office , 2013 .

[20]  P. Rey,et al.  Edinburgh Research Explorer Non-obviousness and Screening , 2012 .

[21]  L. Andrews,et al.  Patents on Human Genes: An Analysis of Scope and Claims , 2005, Science.

[22]  Michael J. Meurer,et al.  The Settlement of Patent Litigation , 1989 .

[23]  Deepak Hegde,et al.  What is the Probability of Receiving a U.S. Patent? , 2015 .

[24]  B. Noveck "Peer to Patent": Collective Intelligence, Open Review, and Patent Reform , 2006 .

[25]  Ariel Pakes,et al.  Estimates of the Value of Patent Rights in European Countries During Thepost-1950 Period , 1985 .

[26]  Mark Schankerman,et al.  How Valuable is Patent Protection?: Estimates by Technology Field , 1998 .

[27]  Hong Luo,et al.  Tort Reform and Innovation , 2016, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[28]  Mark Schankerman,et al.  Patent renewals and R&D incentives , 1998 .

[29]  Ramon Faulí-Oller,et al.  Welfare reducing licensing , 2002, Games Econ. Behav..

[30]  Mark A. Lemley,et al.  Rethinking Patent Law's Presumption of Validity , 2007 .

[31]  Mark A. Schankerman,et al.  Characteristics of patent litigation: a window on competition , 2001 .

[32]  Suzanne Scotchmer,et al.  On the Optimality of the Patent Renewal System , 1999 .

[33]  Mark A. Schankerman,et al.  Identifying Technology Spillovers and Product Market Rivalry , 2005 .

[34]  M. Heller,et al.  Can Patents Deter Innovation , 1998 .

[35]  Carl Shapiro,et al.  How Strong Are Weak Patents , 2008 .

[36]  F. Schuett Inventors and Imposters: An Analysis of Patent Examination with Self-Selection of Firms into R&D , 2012 .

[37]  Young Back Choi Innovation and Its Discontents: How Our Broken Patent System is Endangering Innovation and Progress, and What to Do About It , 2007 .

[38]  Mark A. Lemley Fixing the Patent Office , 2012, Innovation Policy and the Economy.

[39]  Eric Maskin,et al.  Sequential Innovation, Patents, and Imitation , 2000 .

[40]  Michael D. Frakes,et al.  Does the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office Grant Too Many Bad Patents?: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment , 2014 .