Determination of the presampled MTF in computed tomography.

A technique for measuring the presampled MTF in CT scanners is described. The technique uses a simple phantom consisting of approximately 0.050 mm aluminum foil sandwiched by flat plastic or tissue-equivalent slabs. The aluminum foil is slightly angled with respect to the reconstruction matrix, and CT images are acquired. The acquired CT image yields an angled slit image that can be used to synthesize the presampled line spread function (LSF). The presampled MTF is calculated from the presampled LSF. The technique is a direct extension of that proposed by Fujita et al. [IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 11, 34-39 (1992)] for MTF calculation on digital radiography images. While the MTF in clinical CT scanners often reaches negligible amplitude below the Nyquist frequency, the technique is easy to implement, requires inexpensive materials, is robust to aliasing, and is more resilient to noise due to greater data averaging than conventional PSF-integration techniques. Use of the proposed technique is illustrated on a clinical multiple detector array scanner, and MTFs are shown for several common reconstruction kernels. It is likely that the proposed technique would be useful for all tomographic imaging systems, including single photon emission computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound scanners.

[1]  K. Balto,et al.  Quantification of Periapical Bone Destruction in Mice by Micro-computed Tomography , 2000, Journal of dental research.

[2]  J T Dobbins,et al.  Effects of undersampling on the proper interpretation of modulation transfer function, noise power spectra, and noise equivalent quanta of digital imaging systems. , 1995, Medical physics.

[3]  P Cloetens,et al.  A synchrotron radiation microtomography system for the analysis of trabecular bone samples. , 1999, Medical physics.

[4]  M Noda,et al.  High-resolution micro-computed tomography analyses of the abnormal trabecular bone structures in klotho gene mutant mice. , 2000, The Journal of endocrinology.

[5]  Kunio Doi,et al.  A simple method for determining the modulation transfer function in digital radiography , 1992, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[6]  E L Nickoloff,et al.  A simplified approach for modulation transfer function determinations in computed tomography. , 1985, Medical physics.

[7]  P. Judy,et al.  The line spread function and modulation transfer function of a computed tomographic scanner. , 1976, Medical physics.

[8]  Poletti Jl.  Performance assessment of CT scanners. , 1986 .

[9]  R L Morin,et al.  A practical method to measure the MTF of CT scanners. , 1982, Medical physics.

[10]  E. Samei,et al.  A method for measuring the presampled MTF of digital radiographic systems using an edge test device. , 1998, Medical physics.

[11]  J. Ehrhardt,et al.  Modulation transfer function of the EMI CT head scanner. , 1977, Medical physics.

[12]  M L Giger,et al.  Measurement of the presampling modulation transfer function of film digitizers using a curve fitting technique. , 1990, Medical physics.

[13]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  High-contrast resolution of CT images for bone structure analysis. , 1992, Medical physics.

[14]  J. Boone,et al.  A multiple detector array helical x-ray microtomography system for specimen imaging. , 1999, Medical physics.

[15]  J A Seibert,et al.  Sinusoidal modulation analysis for optical system MTF measurements. , 1996, Medical physics.

[16]  J Nosil,et al.  Linearity and contrast scale control in computed tomography. , 1989, Medical physics.