Quality of life after radiation therapy of cerebral low-grade gliomas of the adult: results of a randomised Phase III trial on dose response (EORTC trial 22844)

In 1985, the EORTC Radiotherapy Co-operative Group launched a randomised phase III study comparing high-dose (59.4 Gy in 6.5 weeks) versus low-dose (45 Gy in 5 weeks) radiotherapy with conventional techniques in patients diagnosed with low-grade cerebral glioma. The primary endpoint of the study was survival. No difference in survival was observed between the two treatment strategies. A quality of life (QoL) questionnaire consisting of 47 items assessing a range of physical, psychological, social, and symptom domains was included in the trial to measure the impact of treatment over time. Patients who received high-dose radiotherapy tended to report lower levels of functioning and more symptom burden following completion of radiotherapy. These group differences were statistically significant for fatigue/malaise and insomnia immediately after radiotherapy and in leisure time and emotional functioning at 7-15 months after randomisation. These findings suggest that for conventional radiotherapy for low-grade cerebral glioma, a schedule of 45 Gy in 5 weeks not only saves valuable resources, but also spares patients a prolonged treatment at no loss of clinical efficacy.

[1]  L. Schad,et al.  Low-grade astrocytoma: treatment with conventionally fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy. , 1996, Radiology.

[2]  Fabrice Kwiatkowski,et al.  Low grade supratentorial astrocytomas. Management and prognostic factors , 1994, Cancer.

[3]  A. Karim,et al.  Assessment of quality of life in patients treated for low-grade glioma: a preliminary report. , 1992, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[4]  V. Levin Controversies in the treatment of low-grade astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas. , 1996, Current opinion in oncology.

[5]  M. Faist,et al.  Interstitial radiosurgery of low-grade gliomas , 1995 .

[6]  A. Karim,et al.  A randomized trial on dose-response in radiation therapy of low-grade cerebral glioma: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Study 22844. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  D. Coyle,et al.  Quality of life questionnaires in cancer clinical trials: Imputing missing values , 1994 .

[8]  A. Karim,et al.  Cognitive functions and quality of life in patients with low‐grade gliomas: The impact of radiotherapy , 1994, Annals of neurology.

[9]  N. Aaronson,et al.  The role of health care providers and significant others in evaluating the quality of life of patients with chronic disease: A review , 1992 .

[10]  D. Kondziolka,et al.  Survival after stereotactic biopsy and irradiation of cerebral nonanaplastic, nonpilocytic astrocytoma. , 1995, Journal of neurosurgery.

[11]  L. Recht,et al.  Suspected low‐grade glioma: Is deferring treatment safe? , 1992, Annals of neurology.

[12]  M. Bergner,et al.  The Sickness Impact Profile: Development and Final Revision of a Health Status Measure , 1981, Medical care.

[13]  D. Osoba,et al.  The use of significant others as proxy raters of the quality of life of patients with brain cancer. , 1997, Medical care.

[14]  A. Karim Cure and Quality of Life After Treatment for Glioma , 1991 .