Clinical application of artificial bone in the maxillofacial region

Hard tissue reconstruction is very useful for bony defects of the maxillofacial region. Autogenous bone, allogeneic bone, and artificial bone have been used to reconstruct maxillofacial bone; however, the use of autogenous bone involves high surgical invasiveness because of the need to harvest the bone. The use of allogeneic bone is associated with infections, raises ethical concerns, and is not widely used in Japan. Artificial bone has several advantages, including no need for bone harvesting, excellent biocompatibility, and a relatively easy surgical procedure. Use of artificial bone avoids the much greater invasiveness of harvesting bone, and several types of artificial bone have been developed. Design requirements for artificial bone include surgical manipulability, structural compatibility with the defective area, support properties, and the ability to induce bone regeneration; however, no artificial bone meeting all these requirements has yet been developed. Artificial bone is used in many patients in our medical center, and we have been active in developing the next generation of artificial bone with better properties. In this article, we present a case history and discuss the future development of artificial bone for use in maxillofacial reconstruction.

[1]  B. Melsen,et al.  A histomorphometric evaluation of factors influencing the healing of bony defects surrounding implants. , 2005, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[2]  H. Katano,et al.  Tailor-made orbitocranioplasty for a sphenorbital encephalocele presenting as pulsatile exophthalmos. Case report. , 2007, Journal of neurosurgery.

[3]  I. Ono,et al.  Treatment of extensive cranial bone defects using computer-designed hydroxyapatite ceramics and periosteal flaps. , 1993, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[4]  A. Gebhardt,et al.  Custom-made cast titanium implants produced with CAD/CAM for the reconstruction of cranium defects. , 1998, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[5]  Jing-Jing Fang,et al.  Comparison of 2 methods of making surgical models for correction of facial asymmetry. , 2005, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[6]  Y Raulo,et al.  Taking Calvarial Grafts, Either Split In Situ or Splitting of the Parietal Bone Flap Ex Vivo—Tools and Techniques: V. A 9650-Case Experience in Craniofacial and Maxillofacial Surgery , 2005, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[7]  Eleftherios Tsiridis,et al.  Bone substitutes: an update. , 2005, Injury.

[8]  Hideyuki Tada,et al.  Preshaped Hydroxyapatite Tricalcium-Phosphate Implant Using Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography in the Reconstruction of Bone Deformities of Craniomaxillofacial Region , 2002, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[9]  K. Ishikawa,et al.  Comparison of the Effects of Added α- and β- Tricalcium Phosphate on the Basic Properties of Apatite Cement , 2007 .

[10]  N Samman,et al.  Computer-assisted three-dimensional surgical planning and simulation: 3D virtual osteotomy. , 2000, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[11]  N Samman,et al.  Computer-assisted three-dimensional surgical planning and simulation: 3D color facial model generation. , 2000, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[12]  B. Eppley Hydroxyapatite Cranioplasty: I. Experimental Results From a New Quick-Setting Material , 2003, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[13]  M. Mastrogiacomo,et al.  Tissue engineering of bone: search for a better scaffold. , 2005, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[14]  B. Eppley,et al.  Craniofacial Reconstruction With Computer-Generated HTR Patient-Matched Implants: Use in Primary Bony Tumor Excision , 2002, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[15]  L. Sennerby,et al.  Histologic analysis of clinical biopsies taken 6 months and 3 years after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with 80% bovine hydroxyapatite and 20% autogenous bone mixed with fibrin glue. , 2001, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[16]  Y Raulo,et al.  Autogenous Bone Grafts and Bone Substitutes—Tools and Techniques: I. A 20,000-Case Experience in Maxillofacial and Craniofacial Surgery , 2005, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[17]  T. Wang,et al.  In situ study on the curing process of calcium phosphate bone cement , 2007, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.