Measuring Driver Distraction with the Box Task - A Summary of Two Experimental Studies

The evaluation of the distraction potential of secondary task activities while driving has traditionally been focused on visual-manual tasks. In previous years, different test protocols have been developed and standardized to evaluate the distraction effects of in-vehicle information systems while driving. However, the assessment of cognitive distraction has not received much attention in this context. In the present paper, a new method, that combines a two-dimensional tracking task (the so called ‘Box Task’) with the Detection Response Task, is proposed. Thus, visual-manual as well as cognitive distraction effects can be assessed. Two evaluation studies are summarized that confirm the ability of this new evaluation method to distinguish between different types and levels of distraction.

[1]  John Martin,et al.  Distraction Effects of Manual Number and Text Entry While Driving: (563352012-001) , 2011 .

[2]  L Parmer Tijerina DRIVER WORKLOAD ASSESSMENT OF ROUTE GUIDANCE SYSTEM DESTINATION ENTRY WHILE DRIVING: A TEST TRACK STUDY , 1998 .

[3]  John Martin,et al.  Distraction Effects of Manual Number and Text Entry While Driving - Part 1 , 2013 .

[4]  Jeff K Caird,et al.  Safety-critical event risk associated with cell phone tasks as measured in naturalistic driving studies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  D. Broadbent,et al.  From detection to identification: Response to multiple targets in rapid serial visual presentation , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  Li Hsieh,et al.  The dimensional model of driver demand: visual-manual tasks , 2016 .

[7]  Joanne L. Harbluk,et al.  Cell phone communication and driver visual behavior: the impact of cognitive distraction , 2003, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[8]  David L. Strayer,et al.  Measuring Cognitive Distraction in the Automobile , 2013 .

[9]  Natasha Merat,et al.  Effects of Cognitive Load on Driving Performance: The Cognitive Control Hypothesis , 2017, Hum. Factors.

[10]  J. Engström Effects of Visual and Cognitive Distraction on Lane Change Test Performance , 2017 .

[11]  Tibor Petzoldt,et al.  How does a lower predictability of lane changes affect performance in the Lane Change Task? , 2014, Applied ergonomics.

[12]  Stefan Mattes,et al.  Surrogate Distraction Measurement Techniques: The Lane Change Test , 2009 .

[13]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  Evaluation of a Radio Tuning Task on Android while Driving , 2015 .