Applications of acoustic emission evaluation for civil infrastructure

Due to the state of aging civil infrastructure systems structural health monitoring and nondestructive evaluation have received increased attention recently. Events related to bridge collapses in Pennsylvania (partial) and Minnesota (catastrophic) combined with the levee failures in Louisiana have justifiably drawn the attention of the policy makers and the public at large. Therefore it appears likely that both monitoring efforts of existing systems and the development of more resilient systems will be increased. In the case of civil structures (bridges, dams, levees, and buildings) the most common type of sensors used are strain gages and accelerometers. While these sensors can be useful if used correctly they are limited in the types of data that can be gathered and are not well-suited for many applications. In contrast acoustic emission sensors are very rarely used for civil applications but can in fact provide useful information either as a stand-alone data type or to supplement the data gathered from other sensors. This paper describes several case studies where acoustic emission has been successfully used in civil infrastructure applications and summarizes both the advantages and challenges that are inherent in the method for such applications.

[1]  Richard J. Lipton,et al.  New Directions In Testing , 1989, Distributed Computing And Cryptography.

[2]  Sj Ternowchek,et al.  Personnel Qualification and Certification for Acoustic Emission Testing of Aerial Devices , 1992 .

[3]  Jeffrey L Schulz IN SEARCH OF BETTER LOAD RATINGS. , 1993 .

[4]  Paul H Ziehl,et al.  Fatigue Behavior and Nondestructive Evaluation of Full-Scale FRP Honeycomb Bridge Specimen , 2006 .

[5]  Urs Meier,et al.  Innovative Design of FRP Combined with Concrete: Long-Term Behavior , 1995 .

[6]  J. Gustavo Tumialan,et al.  In-Situ Evaluation of Two Concrete Slab Systems. II: Evaluation Criteria and Outcomes , 2008 .

[7]  Paul Ziehl,et al.  Hybrid Bridges in Texas , 2004 .

[8]  Sj Ternowchek,et al.  Advances in AE Technology for Testing of Aerial Devices , 1992 .

[9]  Paul Ziehl,et al.  Nondestructive Evaluation of FRP Design Criteria With Primary Consideration to Fatigue Loading , 2004 .

[10]  George C. Lee,et al.  Static and fatigue testing of hybrid fiber-reinforced polymer-concrete bridge superstructure , 2004 .

[11]  Kanji Ono,et al.  DIAGNOSTICS OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGES BY ACOUSTIC EMISSION , 2002 .

[12]  Paul Ziehl,et al.  Fiber reinforced vessel design with a damage criterion approach , 2003 .

[13]  M. Forde,et al.  Predicting the ultimate bending capacity of concrete beams from the “relaxation ratio” analysis of AE signals , 2005 .

[14]  T. J. Fowler,et al.  The MONPAC system , 1989 .

[15]  Lijuan Cheng,et al.  New bridge systems using FRP composites and concrete: a state-of-the-art review , 2006 .

[16]  Masayasu Ohtsu,et al.  DAMAGE ASSESSMENT OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAMS QUALIFIED BY ACOUSTIC EMISSION , 2002 .

[17]  Adrian A. Pollock Loading and stress in acoustic emission testing , 2004 .

[18]  J. Gustavo Tumialan,et al.  In-Situ Evaluation of Two Concrete Slab Systems. I: Load Determination and Loading Procedure , 2008 .