An exploratory field study of differences in information technology use between more- and less-innovative middle managers

Based on data collected in 1988, this research explored the differences between more- and less-innovative middle managers in their use of information and information technology (IT). It involved a field study of ninety-nine middle managers in a division of a major defense contracting manufacturing organization in the St. Paul/Minneapolis area of the USA. Results suggest that the more-innovative middle managers are inclined to use data drawn from personal experience and insights rather than historical data and found IT generally important. Apparently, innovative middle managers use less complex programs, and when in-depth analyses are needed, their execution was generally delegated. The prime interpretation of the results is that innovative middle managers use IT as a vehicle for networking. They distribute more of their IT output to others. Even though they do not use IT more, they frequently contact local and expert support functions. These findings indicate that future research efforts should address the issues of how managerial business and IT innovativeness are related to IT use and networking behaviors.

[1]  Andrew Stein Re-engineering the executive: The 4th generation of EIS , 1995, Inf. Manag..

[2]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Use of Information in Decision Making: An Experimental Investigation of the Impact of Computer-Based Decision Aids , 1992, MIS Q..

[3]  Cynthia Mathis Beath,et al.  Supporting the information technology champion , 1991 .

[4]  M. Treacy,et al.  Utilization as a dependent variable in MIS research , 2015, DATB.

[5]  M. J. Stahl,et al.  Measuring innovation, productivity, and job performance of professionals: A decision modeling approach , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[6]  Harvey J. Brightman,et al.  Can information technology improve managerial problem finding? , 1994, Inf. Manag..

[7]  John Edward Gochenouer An empirical study of the impact of a decision support language on knowledge workers (decision, productivity, model, salary, software) , 1985 .

[8]  Jawaid A. Ghani,et al.  Task uncertainty and the use of computer technology , 1992, Inf. Manag..

[9]  David H. Benson A Field Study of End User Computing: Findings and Issues , 1983, MIS Q..

[10]  Michael J. Stahl,et al.  Improving R&D Productivity: Measuring Innovation and Productivity — A Peer Rating Approach , 1977 .

[11]  J. Dutton,et al.  SELLING ISSUES TO TOP MANAGEMENT , 1993 .

[12]  F. Damanpour Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis Of Effects Of Determinants and Moderators , 1991 .

[13]  Cynthia Mathis Beath,et al.  The information technology champion: aiding and abetting, care and feeding , 1988, Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1988. Vol.IV. Applications Track.

[14]  Tor J. Larsen,et al.  Middle Managers' Contribution to Implemented Information Technology Innovation , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[15]  James S. House Work and Personality: An Inquiry into the Impact of Social Stratification.By Melvin L. Kohn and Carmi Schooler with the collaboration of Joanne Miller, Karen A. Miller, Carrie Schoenbach and Ronald Schoenbach. Ablex, 1983. 389 pp. Cloth, $38.50; paper, $19.50 , 1986 .

[16]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  An examination of end-user types , 1992, Inf. Manag..

[17]  Tor Guimaraes,et al.  Exploring the relationship between IC success and company performance , 1994, Inf. Manag..

[18]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Measuring And Assessing Organizations , 1980 .

[19]  R. Kanter The Change Masters , 1983 .

[20]  James C. Wetherbe,et al.  The Adoption of Spreadsheet Software: Testing Innovation Diffusion Theory in the Context of End-User Computing , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[21]  James F. Courtney,et al.  A Field Study of Organizational Factors Influencing DSS Success , 1985, MIS Q..

[22]  Rudolf Vetschera,et al.  A process-oriented framework for the evaluation of managerial support systems , 1995, Inf. Manag..

[23]  R. Kelly Rainer,et al.  Executive Information Systems: A Framework for Development and a Survey of Current Practices , 1991, MIS Q..

[24]  Michael Aiken,et al.  Organizational Structure, Work Process, and Proposal Making in Administrative Bureaucracies , 1980 .

[25]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  An Attribute Space for Organizational Communication Channels , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[26]  R. Kahn,et al.  Organizational psychology. , 1967, Annual review of psychology.

[27]  John E. Ettlie,et al.  A note on the relationship between managerial change values, innovative intentions and innovative technology outcomes in food sector firms , 1983 .

[28]  M. Glynn Innovative Genius: A Framework for Relating Individual and Organizational Intelligences to Innovation , 1996 .

[29]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Central problems in the management of innovation , 1986 .

[30]  Denis M. S. Lee Usage Patterns and Sources of Assistance for Personal Computer Users , 1986, MIS Q..

[31]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  Management information systems : conceptual foundations, structure, and development , 1985 .

[32]  T. J. Larsen Managers' use of computers: end-user computing in perspective , 1991, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[33]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations, Fourth Edition , 1982 .

[34]  LeeDenis M.S Usage patterns and sources of assistance for personal computer users , 1986 .

[35]  John E. Ettlie,et al.  INNOVATIVE ATTITUDES, VALUES, AND INTENTIONS IN ORGANIZATIONS [1] , 1982 .

[36]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..