Cognitive Correlates of Improvised Behaviour in Disaster Response: The Cases of the Murrah Building and the World Trade Center

While emergency response actions are known to range from conventional to improvised, less is known about the thinking processes that underlie these actions. This paper presents a statistical analysis of cognition and behaviour reported by police personnel who responded to two significant US disasters: the 1995 bombing of the Murrah Building in Oklahoma City and the 2001 attack on the World Trade Center in New York City.The results suggest the prominence of conventional behaviour coupled with cognitive processes closely tied to recognition, and of improvised behaviours that are linked to more explicit reasoning processes. The results underscore the value of exploring cognitive foundations of both conventional and improvised behaviours to enrich understanding of human response to disaster. 1. Overview

[1]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[2]  K. Tierney,et al.  Organizing for Emergency Management , 2007 .

[3]  P. Davies The American heritage dictionary of the English language , 1981 .

[4]  H. Simon,et al.  Studies of Scientific Discovery: Complementary Approaches and Convergent Findings , 1999 .

[5]  G. Kreps Sociological Inquiry and Disaster Research , 1984 .

[6]  M. Cunha,et al.  Organizational improvisation: what, when, how, and why , 1999 .

[7]  W. Wallace,et al.  Studying Organizationally-situated Improvisation in Response to Extreme Events , 2004, International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters.

[8]  Gary R. Webb,et al.  ROLE IMPROVISING UNDER CONDITIONS OF UNCERTAINTY: A CLASSIFICATION OF TYPES , 1999 .

[9]  D. L. Simms,et al.  Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies , 1986 .

[10]  K. Tierney From the Margins to the Mainstream? Disaster Research at the Crossroads , 2007 .

[11]  Gary A. Kreps,et al.  Disaster and the Social Order , 1985 .

[12]  William A. Wallace,et al.  The EXXON Valdez: An Assessment of Crisis Prevention and Management Systems , 1990 .

[13]  Karina Aase,et al.  Learning in emergency organisations: trial without error , 2003 .

[14]  G. Klein,et al.  Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods , 1993 .

[15]  Russell R. Dynes,et al.  Organizational Communications and Decision Making in Crises , 1976 .

[16]  David Mendonça,et al.  A Cognitive Model of Improvisation in Emergency Management , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[17]  Ove Njå,et al.  An Essay on Research Methodology: An Alternative Approach to Incident Command Research Through Participatory Action Research , 2008 .

[18]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Collaborative Discovery in a Scientific Domain , 1997, Cogn. Sci..

[19]  R. A. Stallings,et al.  Methods of Disaster Research , 2003 .

[20]  Andrew R. McGill,et al.  Normal accidents: Living with high‐risk technologies, by Charles Perrow. New York, Basic Books, 386 pp. $21.95 , 1984 .

[21]  Edwin Hutchins,et al.  Organizing Work by Adaptation , 1991 .

[22]  M. F. Fuller,et al.  Practical Nonparametric Statistics; Nonparametric Statistical Inference , 1973 .

[23]  Anne S. Miner,et al.  Organizational Improvisation and Learning: A Field Study , 2001 .

[24]  T. Drabek Managing the Emergency Response. , 1985 .

[25]  Christophe Roux-Dufort,et al.  The Difficulties of Improvising in a Crisis Situation - A Case Study , 2003 .

[26]  Karlene H. Roberts,et al.  The Incident Command System : High Reliability Organizing for Complex and Volatile Task , 2007 .

[27]  Dusya Vera,et al.  Improvisation and Innovative Performance in Teams , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[28]  David Klahr,et al.  Dual Space Search During Scientific Reasoning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[29]  W. Waugh,et al.  Emergency management : principles and practice for local government , 2007 .

[30]  E. Quarantelli,et al.  Response to Social Crisis and Disaster , 1977 .

[31]  E. Salas,et al.  Taking stock of naturalistic decision making , 2001 .

[32]  Kathleen M. Carley Extracting team mental models through textual analysis , 1997 .

[33]  I. Helsloot,et al.  A Critical Examination of the Assumptions Regarding Centralized Coordination in Large-Scale Emergency Situations , 2013 .

[34]  K. Weick,et al.  Introductory Essay : Improvisation As a Mindset for Organizational Analysis , 1998 .

[35]  G. Klein,et al.  A recognition-primed decision (RPD) model of rapid decision making. , 1993 .

[36]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[37]  Judy A. Franklin,et al.  Improvisation and Learning , 2001, NIPS.

[38]  E. L. Quarantelli,et al.  The Disaster Research Center Field Studies of Organized Behavior in the Crisis Time Period of Disasters , 1997, International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters.

[39]  William Morris The American Heritage dictionary of the English language , 1969 .

[40]  M. Feldman,et al.  Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change , 2003 .

[41]  T. Drabek,et al.  Emergency management : principles and practice for local government , 1991 .

[42]  G. A. Kreps,et al.  Disaster as Systemic Event and Social Catalyst: A Clarification of Subject Matter , 1995, International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters.

[43]  K. Weick The Collapse of Sensemaking in Organizations: The Mann Gulch Disaster , 1993 .

[44]  T. J. Scanlon The Role of EOCs in Emergency Management: A Comparison of Canadian and American Experience , 1994 .

[45]  Stian Antonsen,et al.  Safety Culture Assessment: A Mission Impossible? , 2009 .

[46]  K. Weick Improvisation as a Mindset for Organizational Analysis , 1998 .

[47]  J Patrick,et al.  Human processes of control: tracing the goals and strategies of control room teams , 2006, Ergonomics.

[48]  Gary A. Kreps,et al.  Disaster, Organizing, and Role Enactment: A Structural Approach , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[49]  B. Brehmer Dynamic decision making: human control of complex systems. , 1992, Acta psychologica.

[50]  K. Weick,et al.  Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. , 1993 .

[51]  Cleotilde Gonzalez,et al.  Learning to Make Decisions in Dynamic Environments: Effects of Time Constraints and Cognitive Abilities , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[52]  A. S. Cole,et al.  Sex and the Social Order , 1946, Mental Health.

[53]  C. Carlsson,et al.  AHP in Political Group Decisions: A Study in the Art of Possibilities , 1995 .

[54]  Gary R. Webb Role improvising during crisis situations , 2004 .

[55]  Linda Shields,et al.  Content Analysis , 2015 .

[56]  B.J.M. Ale,et al.  Classification of fatal firefighter accidents in the Netherlands: Time pressure and aim of the suppression activity , 2008 .

[57]  B. Pentland,et al.  Organizational Routines as Grammars of Action , 1994 .

[58]  Gudela Grote,et al.  Coordination in high-risk organizations: the need for flexible routines , 2009, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[59]  K. Weick Drop Your Tools: An Allegory for Organizational Studies. , 1996 .

[60]  E. L. Quarantelli,et al.  Uses and Preblems of Local EOCs in Disasters , 1978 .

[61]  William A. Wallace,et al.  "We were always re-organizing...": some crisis management implications of the Exxon Valdez oil spill , 1992 .

[62]  G. Kreps Social structure and disaster , 1990 .