Acceptability of domestic violence against women in the European Union: a multilevel analysis

Study objective: The acceptability of domestic violence against women (DVAW) plays an important part in shaping the social environment in which the victims are embedded, which in turn may contribute either to perpetuate or to reduce the levels of DVAW in our societies. This study analyses correlates of the acceptability of DVAW in the European Union (EU). Design: Three level ordinal logistic regression of 13 457 people nested within 212 localities (cities), nested within 15 countries of the EU. Sampling is multistage with random probability. All interviews were face to face in people’s homes. The outcome variable was acceptability of DVAW. Multiple correlates at the individual, locality, and country level were analysed. Setting: European Union, 1999. Participants: National data were used of residents 15 years old and above of all member states in 1999 (n = 13 457). Average response rate was 47%, although it varied across countries (23%–73%). Main results: Higher levels of acceptability were reported by those who perceived DVAW as less severe and less frequent. Acceptability is higher among men who know a perpetrator and lower among men who know a victim. Victim blaming attitude is associated with higher levels of acceptability. In countries with higher gender empowerment measure the difference in acceptability among those who blame and those who do not blame the victim is greater. Conclusions: There are still widespread attitudes in the EU such as victim blaming that condone DVAW, contributing to a climate of social acceptability of DVAW. Further efforts to reduce the acceptability of DVAW are still needed.

[1]  L. Radford.  Women in a violent world: Feminist analyses and resistance across Europe , 1998 .

[2]  Leo Zwaak,et al.  I Council of Europe , 1951, International Organization.

[3]  Claudia J. Coulton,et al.  Building Community Capacity for Violence Prevention , 2004, Journal of interpersonal violence.

[4]  Mich.,et al.  American Medical Association Diagnostic and Treatment Guidelines on Domestic Violence. , 1992, Archives of family medicine.

[5]  Charlene K. Baker,et al.  Moving Beyond the Individual: Examining the Effects of Domestic Violence Policies on Social Norms , 2003, American journal of community psychology.

[6]  C. Clark,et al.  Neighborhood poverty as a predictor of intimate partner violence among White, Black, and Hispanic couples in the United States: a multilevel analysis. , 2000, Annals of epidemiology.

[7]  Enrique Gracia,et al.  Unreported cases of domestic violence against women: towards an epidemiology of social silence, tolerance, and inhibition , 2004, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

[8]  C. Hagemann-White.  European Research on the Prevalence of Violence Against Women , 2001 .

[9]  J. Church.  Human Development Report , 2001 .

[10]  C. Muehlenhard,et al.  The Social Construction of Violence: The Case of Sexual and Domestic Violence , 1999, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[11]  Patricia O'Campo,et al.  Invited commentary: Advancing theory and methods for multilevel models of residential neighborhoods and health. , 2003, American journal of epidemiology.

[12]  G. Krantz,et al.  Violence against women: a global public health issue! , 2002, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[13]  M. D. Smith.  Sociodemographic Risk Factors in Wife Abuse: Results from a Survey of Toronto Women , 1990 .

[14]  Ross Macmillan,et al.  When she brings home the bacon: Labor-force participation and the risk of spousal violence against women. , 1999 .

[15]  B. Weiner.  A Cognitive (Attribution)-Emotion-Action Model of Motivated Behavior: An Analysis of Judgments of Help-Giving. , 1980 .

[16]  M. Straus,et al.  Change in cultural norms approving marital violence from 1968 to 1994. , 1997 .

[17]  K. Yllo.  Sexual Equality and Violence Against Wives in American States , 1983 .

[18]  Paul A. Longley,et al.  GIS and Public Policy , 1994 .

[19]  R. Dobash,et al.  Women, violence, and social change , 1992 .

[20]  M. McQuestion.  Endogenous social effects on intimate partner violence in Colombia , 2003 .

[21]  G. L. Fox,et al.  Neighborhood Disadvantage, Individual Economic Distress and Violence Against Women in Intimate Relationships , 2003 .

[22]  S. Hashemi,et al.  Credit programs, patriarchy and men's violence against women in rural Bangladesh. , 1996, Social science & medicine.

[23]  V. Banyard,et al.  Document Title: Rape Prevention Through Bystander Education: Bringing a Broader Community Perspective to Sexual Violence Prevention , 2004 .

[24]  C. Pallitto,et al.  Community level effects of gender inequality on intimate partner violence and unintended pregnancy in Colombia: testing the feminist perspective. , 2005, Social science & medicine.

[25]  Basile Chaix,et al.  A brief conceptual tutorial of multilevel analysis in social epidemiology: linking the statistical concept of clustering to the idea of contextual phenomenon , 2005, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

[26]  J. Obergfell-Fuchs,et al.  The Extent of Family Violence in Europe , 2004 .

[27]  Christopher R. Browning.  The Span of Collective Efficacy: Extending Social Disorganization Theory to Partner Violence , 2002 .

[28]  L. Fitzgerald,et al.  No Safe Haven: Male Violence Against Women at Home, at Work, and in the Community , 1994 .

[29]  M. Straus,et al.  Societal Change and Change in Family Violence from 1975 to 1985 As Revealed by Two National Surveys , 1986 .

[30]  Yuk Fai Cheong,et al.  HLM 6: Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modeling , 2000 .

[31]  H. Kanitkar.  Equal opportunities for men and women , 1973 .

[32]  D. Besharov.  Family Violence: Research and Public Policy Issues for the 90's , 1990 .

[33]  D Lee,et al.  The World Health Organisation , 2001, British journal of perioperative nursing : the journal of the National Association of Theatre Nurses.

[34]  L. Allen,et al.  Violence against women: a priority health issue. , 1997 .

[35]  Violence against women. The congressional response. , 1993, The American psychologist.

[36]  David A. Lishner,et al.  Altruism and helping behavior , 2003 .

[37]  Achim Kowalczyk,et al.  Behind Closed Doors. Violence in the American Family , 1990 .

[38]  Basile Chaix,et al.  A brief conceptual tutorial on multilevel analysis in social epidemiology: investigating contextual phenomena in different groups of people , 2005, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

[39]  E. Krug,et al.  The world report on violence and health , 2002, The Lancet.

[40]  L. Fitzgerald,et al.  Male violence against women. Current research and future directions. , 1993, The American psychologist.

[41]  Jacquelyn C. Campbell,et al.  Ending domestic violence : changing public perceptions/halting the epidemic , 1998 .

[42]  H. Bienen.  Violence and social change , 1968 .

[43]  Eugene J. Kanin,et al.  An Examination of Sexual Aggression as a Response to Sexual Frustration , 1967 .

[44]  F. Lorenz,et al.  Linking economic hardship to marital quality and instability. , 1990 .

[45]  A C Gielen,et al.  Violence by male partners against women during the childbearing year: a contextual analysis. , 1995, American journal of public health.