Towards an Enhanced Learning Management System for Blended Learning in Higher Education Incorporating Distinct Learners' Profiles

In a blended education context, Learning Management Systems (LMS) can be thought to integrate collaborative and interactive learning activities; this, however, requires a strong institutional and sociocultural commitment from all stakeholders. Consequently, an empirical study that aims at identifying learners' profiles and uses them as an optimization feedback-like process to the LMS towards effective blended (b-)learning was adopted here. The latter involved 36 undergraduate students with variant b-learning activity at a public Higher Education Institution. In a synergetic combination of qualitative and quantitative evidences, semi-structured face-to-face interviews were conducted and validated, and a systematic multivariate content analysis was articulated. Results revealed three distinct students' profiles oriented to interactive learning environment, Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) teachers' beliefs, and students' training. Under this multifaceted scenario, a rethinking of the LMS within the b-learning environment could be approached through the enhancement of interactivity, fostering users' ICT acquaintance, and incorporating further training.

[1]  Camille Johnson-Yale,et al.  Academic work, the Internet and U.S. college students , 2008, Internet High. Educ..

[2]  Glenn Gordon Smith,et al.  E-learning commodity or community: Disciplinary differences between online courses , 2008, Internet High. Educ..

[3]  Yves Punie,et al.  Learning 2.0: the Impact of Web 2.0 Innovations on Education and Training in Europe , 2009 .

[4]  A. D. Gordon,et al.  Correspondence Analysis Handbook. , 1993 .

[5]  Dennis Beck,et al.  The other side of the LMS: Considering implementation and use in the adoption of an LMS in online and blended learning environments , 2007 .

[6]  Eunjoo Oh,et al.  How are Universities involved in Blended Instruction? , 2007, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[7]  Peggy A. Ertmer Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration , 1999 .

[8]  Z. Berge e-Moderating: the key to teaching and learning online , 2013 .

[9]  Atsusi Hirumi,et al.  A Framework for Analyzing, Designing, and Sequencing Planned Elearning Interactions. , 2002 .

[10]  Derek E. Baird,et al.  Online Learning Design that Fosters Student Support, Self-Regulation, and Retention , 2005 .

[11]  Michael Simonson,et al.  Distance education research: a review of the literature , 2011, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[12]  Charles Juwah,et al.  Interactivity in computer-mediated college and university education: A recent review of the literature , 2004, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[13]  N. Fielding,et al.  Going out on a Limb , 2009 .

[14]  Eugene G. McGuire,et al.  Knowledge representation and construction in hypermedia environments , 1996 .

[15]  Lyn Dawes First connections: teachers and the National Grid for Learning , 1999, Comput. Educ..

[16]  Daniel V. Eastmond E-Moderating: The Key to Teaching and Learning Online , 2003 .

[17]  H L Michael,et al.  MANAGEMENT OF RESEARCH. INTRODUCTION , 1973 .

[18]  George D. Kuh,et al.  Adding Value: Learning Communities and Student Engagement , 2004 .

[19]  C. Pérez Andrés [Qualitative methodology]. , 2002, Revista espanola de salud publica.

[20]  M. Easterby-Smith,et al.  Management Research: An Introduction , 1991 .

[21]  Deryn Watson,et al.  Pedagogy before Technology: Re-thinking the Relationship between ICT and Teaching , 2001, Education and Information Technologies.

[22]  J. B. Arbaugh,et al.  Subject matter effects and the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework: An exploratory study , 2010, Internet High. Educ..

[23]  Eva Mary Bures,et al.  Interaction in distance education and online learning: using evidence and theory to improve practice , 2011, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[24]  C. Richards From old to new learning: global imperatives, exemplary Asian dilemmas and ICT as a key to cultural change in education , 2004 .

[25]  Brian Shackel,et al.  Usability - Context, framework, definition, design and evaluation , 1991, Interact. Comput..

[26]  Chien Chou,et al.  The technical framework of interactive functions for course-management systems: Students' perceptions, uses, and evaluations , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[27]  Tao Zhou,et al.  Understanding Online Community User Participation: A Social Influence Perspective , 2011, Internet Res..

[28]  G. Kirkup,et al.  Information and communications technologies (ICT) in higher education teaching—a tale of gradualism rather than revolution , 2005 .

[29]  Claus Pahl,et al.  Intelligent and adaptive tutoring for active learning and training environments , 2009, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[30]  William J. Gerace,et al.  Technology-Enhanced Formative Assessment: A Research-Based Pedagogy for Teaching Science with Classroom Response Technology , 2009 .

[31]  Cristian Borcea,et al.  MobiSoC: a middleware for mobile social computing applications , 2009, Mob. Networks Appl..

[32]  Michael Simonson Trends in distance education technology from an international vantage point , 2005 .

[33]  Cengiz Hakan Aydin REVIEW: The Perfect Online Course: Best Practices For Designing And Teaching , 2010 .

[34]  Michael Simonson,et al.  The Perfect Online Course: Best Practices for Designing and Teaching (Perspectives in Instructional Technology and Distance Education) , 2009 .

[35]  George Siemens,et al.  The MOOC model for digital practice , 2010 .

[36]  Nicholas M. Allix Book Review: Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 2000 .

[37]  G. Leinhardt,et al.  Expertise in mathematics instruction: Subject matter knowledge. , 1985 .

[38]  Azeddine Chikh,et al.  Onto'CoPE: Ontology for Communities of Practice of E-Learning , 2008, EC-TEL.

[39]  J. W. Gikandi,et al.  Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[40]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge , 2006, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[41]  Michael Simonson,et al.  Trends and Issues in Distance Education: International Perspectives , 2005 .

[42]  Scott L. Howell,et al.  Seven strategies for enabling faculty success in distance education , 2004, Internet High. Educ..

[43]  Dave Thomas,et al.  Practice , 2004, IEEE Softw..

[44]  M. Marshall Sampling for qualitative research. , 1996, Family practice.

[45]  鄭宇庭 行銷硏究 : Marketing research , 2009 .

[46]  Judith Borreson Caruso,et al.  Students and Information Technology, 2005: Convenience, Connection, Control, and Learning , 2005 .