Linguistic Self-Correction in the Absence of Feedback: A New Approach to the Logical Problem of Language Acquisition

In a series of studies children show increasing mastery of irregular plural forms (such as mice) simply by producing erroneous over-regularized versions of them (such as mouses). We explain this phenomenon in terms of successive approximation in imitation: Children over-regularize early in acquisition because the representations of frequent, regular plural forms develop more quickly, such that at the earliest stages of production they interfere with children's attempts to imitatively reproduce irregular forms they have heard in the input. As the strength of the representations that determine children's productions settle asymptotically, the early advantage for the frequent regular forms is negated, and children's attempts to imitate the irregular forms they have observed become more likely to succeed (a process that produces the classic U-shape in children's acquisition of plural inflection). These data show that children can acquire correct linguistic behavior without feedback in a situation where, as a result of philosophical and linguistic analyses, it has often been argued that it is logically impossible for them to do so.

[1]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Why do children learn to say “Broke”? A model of learning the past tense without feedback , 2002, Cognition.

[2]  S Pinker,et al.  Overregularization in language acquisition. , 1992, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[3]  A. Smirnova,et al.  Quantitative evaluations in gray crows: Generalization of the relative attribute “larger set” , 1996, Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology.

[4]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Rules or connections in past-tense inflections: what does the evidence rule out? , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[5]  Stan A. Kuczaj,et al.  Children's Judgments of Grammatical and Ungrammatical Irregular Past-Tense Verbs. , 1978 .

[6]  E. Mark Gold,et al.  Language Identification in the Limit , 1967, Inf. Control..

[7]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Knowledge and Obedience: The Developmental Status of the Binding Theory , 1990 .

[8]  M. S. Halliday,et al.  Verbal short-term memory in children: The role of the articulator loop , 1990 .

[9]  Eveline A. Crone,et al.  Neural correlates of developmental differences in risk estimation and feedback processing , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  Patrick Juola,et al.  A connectionist model of english past tense and plural morphology , 1999, Cogn. Sci..

[11]  E. Clark,et al.  Adult reformulations of child errors as negative evidence , 2003, Journal of Child Language.

[12]  Michael Ramscar,et al.  Developmental change and the nature of learning in childhood , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Reflections of the Environment in Memory Form of the Memory Functions , 2022 .

[14]  E. J. Capaldi,et al.  Counting in rats: Its functional significance and the independent cognitive processes that constitute it. , 1988 .

[15]  Michael F. Graves,et al.  Noun plural development in primary grade children. , 1971 .

[16]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  Implementations are not conceptualizations: Revising the verb learning model , 1991, Cognition.

[17]  Robert C. Berwick,et al.  The acquisition of syntactic knowledge , 1985 .

[18]  Jonathan St. B. T. Evans,et al.  The mental model theory of conditional reasoning: critical appraisal and revision , 1993, Cognition.

[19]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[20]  G. Hitch,et al.  Working memory in children , 1983 .

[21]  Adele E. Goldberg Constructions: a new theoretical approach to language , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  S. Pinker Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure , 1989 .

[23]  J. Berko The Child's Learning of English Morphology , 1958 .

[24]  Dan I. Slobin,et al.  The origins of grammaticizable notions: beyond the individual mind , 2014 .

[25]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .

[26]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Test-Enhanced Learning , 2006, Psychological science.

[27]  S. Pinker Whatever Happened to the Past Tense Debate , 2006 .

[28]  S. Pinker Words and Rules: The Ingredients of Language , 1999 .

[29]  Steven Pinker,et al.  Language learnability and language development , 1985 .

[30]  F. Bartlett,et al.  Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology , 1932 .

[31]  E. Newport,et al.  When learners surpass their models: The acquisition of American Sign Language from inconsistent input , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.

[32]  G. Marcus The acquisition of the English past tense in children and multilayered connectionist networks , 1995, Cognition.

[33]  M. R. Manzini Learnability and Cognition , 1991 .

[34]  P. Derks,et al.  Simple strategies in binary prediction by children and adults. , 1967 .

[35]  James L. McClelland,et al.  On learning the past-tenses of English verbs: implicit rules or parallel distributed processing , 1986 .

[36]  V. Marchman,et al.  U-shaped learning and frequency effects in a multi-layered perception: Implications for child language acquisition , 1991, Cognition.

[37]  Elissa L. Newport,et al.  Innately Constrained Learning: Blending Old and New Approaches to Language Acquisition , 2001 .

[38]  H. Ebbinghaus Memory A Contribution Toexperimental Psychology , 1913 .

[39]  Jane Grimsahw Knwoledge and obedience: the developmental status of the binding theory , 1990 .

[40]  P. A. Villiers,et al.  A cross-sectional study of the acquisition of grammatical morphemes in child speech , 1973, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[41]  R. Brown,et al.  A First Language , 1973 .

[42]  J. S. Johnson,et al.  Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[43]  Julian M. Pine,et al.  Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. , 2004 .

[44]  R. Nosofsky Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[45]  Onur Güntürkün,et al.  A bottlenose dolphin discriminates visual stimuli differing in numerosity , 2003, Learning & behavior.

[46]  B. MacWhinney A multiple process solution to the logical problem of language acquisition , 2004, Journal of Child Language.

[47]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior , 1959 .

[48]  G. Marcus Negative evidence in language acquisition , 1993, Cognition.

[49]  G. Kane Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, vol 1: Foundations, vol 2: Psychological and Biological Models , 1994 .

[50]  Michael Ramscar The role of meaning in inflection: Why the past tense does not require a rule , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.

[51]  S. Pinker,et al.  On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition , 1988, Cognition.

[52]  Jacky Emmerton,et al.  Pigeons’ serial ordering of numerosity with visual arrays , 1997 .

[53]  Eve V. Clark,et al.  The Lexicon in Acquisition , 1996 .

[54]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The neural basis of error detection: conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. , 2004, Psychological review.

[55]  Endel Tulving,et al.  The effects of presentation and recall of material in free-recall learning , 1967 .

[56]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Language Acquisition and Use: Learning and Applying Probabilistic Constraints , 1997, Science.

[57]  M. Posner Genes and experience shape brain networks of conscious control. , 2005, Progress in brain research.

[58]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Impairments in verb morphology after brain injury: a connectionist model. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[59]  S. Pinker The Language Instinct , 1994 .

[60]  Bruce D. McCandliss,et al.  Training, maturation, and genetic influences on the development of executive attention. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[61]  Carla L. Hudson Kam,et al.  Regularizing Unpredictable Variation: The Roles of Adult and Child Learners in Language Formation and Change , 2005 .

[62]  V. Marchman,et al.  From rote learning to system building: acquiring verb morphology in children and connectionist nets , 1993, Cognition.

[63]  R. Luce,et al.  The Choice Axiom after Twenty Years , 1977 .

[64]  D. Slobin The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition , 1987 .

[65]  M. Bruck,et al.  The suggestibility of children's memory. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[66]  Sidney J Segalowitz,et al.  Development of Response-Monitoring ERPs in 7- to 25-Year-Olds , 2004, Developmental neuropsychology.

[67]  U. Hahn,et al.  German Inflection: Single Route or Dual Route? , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[68]  Gary F. Marcus,et al.  German Inflection: The Exception That Proves the Rule , 1995, Cognitive Psychology.

[69]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. , 2001, Psychological review.

[70]  R. Baayen,et al.  Putting the bits together: an information theoretical perspective on morphological processing , 2004, Cognition.

[71]  R. Schvaneveldt,et al.  Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[72]  R. Rescorla,et al.  A theory of Pavlovian conditioning : Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement , 1972 .

[73]  J. Hayes Cognition and the development of language , 1970 .

[74]  B. Hayes,et al.  Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: a computational/experimental study , 2003, Cognition.

[75]  J. Stevenson The cultural origins of human cognition , 2001 .

[76]  G. Miller,et al.  Cognitive science. , 1981, Science.

[77]  S. Anderson,et al.  The human language faculty as an organ. , 2000, Annual review of physiology.