An Evaluation of Graduated Driver Licensing Effects on Fatal Crash Involvements of Young Drivers in the United States

Objective: Graduated driver licensing (GDL) systems are designed to reduce the high crash risk of young novice drivers. Almost all states in the United States have some form of a 3-phase GDL system with various restrictions in the intermediate phase. Studies of the effects of GDL in various states show significant reductions in fatal crash involvements of 16- and 17-year-old drivers; however, only a few national studies of GDL effects have been published. The objective of this national panel study was to evaluate the effect of GDL laws on the fatal crash involvements of novice drivers while controlling for possible confounding factors not accounted for in prior studies. Methods: The Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) was used to examine 16- and 17-year-old driver involvement in fatal crashes (where GDL laws are applied) relative to 2 young driver age groups (19–20, 21–25) where GDL would not be expected to have an effect. Dates when various GDL laws were adopted in the states between 1990 and 2007 were coded from a variety of sources. Covariates in the longitudinal panel regression analyses conducted included 4 laws that could have an effect on 16- and 17-year-old drivers: primary enforcement seat belt laws, zero-tolerance (ZT) alcohol laws for drivers younger than age 21, lowering the blood alcohol concentration limit for driving to 0.08, and so-called use and lose laws where drivers aged 20 and younger lose their licenses for underage drinking violations. Results: The adoption of a GDL law of average strength was associated with a significant decrease in fatal crash involvements of 16- and 17-year-old drivers relative to fatal crash involvements of one of the 2 comparison groups. GDL laws rated as “good” showed stronger relationships to fatal crash reductions, and laws rated as “less than good” showed no reductions in crash involvements relative to the older driver comparison groups. Conclusions: States that adopt a basic GDL law can expect a decrease of 8 to 14 percent in the proportion of 16- and 17-year-old drivers involved in fatal crashes (relative to 21- to 25-year-old drivers), depending upon their other existing laws that affect novice drivers, such as those used in these analyses. This finding is consistent with recent national studies that used different outcome measures and covariates. The results of this study provide additional support for states to adopt, maintain, and upgrade GDL systems to reduce youthful traffic crash fatalities.

[1]  R B Voas,et al.  The relationship of alcohol safety laws to drinking drivers in fatal crashes. , 2000, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  A. S. Tippetts,et al.  The impact of underage drinking laws on alcohol-related fatal crashes of young drivers. , 2009, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[3]  James Hedlund,et al.  Novice teen driving: GDL and beyond. , 2007, Journal of safety research.

[4]  A Scott Tippetts,et al.  Impact of Primary Safety Belt Laws on Alcohol-Related Front-Seat Occupant Fatalities: Five Case Studies , 2007, Traffic injury prevention.

[5]  George E. P. Box,et al.  Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control , 1977 .

[6]  A F Williams,et al.  Rationale for graduated licensing and the risks it should address , 2002, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.

[7]  E R Braver,et al.  Carrying passengers as a risk factor for crashes fatal to 16- and 17-year-old drivers. , 2000, JAMA.

[8]  A. S. Tippetts,et al.  Alcohol Involvement in Fatal Crashes Under Three Crash Exposure Measures , 2007, Traffic injury prevention.

[9]  Susan P. Baker,et al.  Graduated Driver Licensing Programs and Fatal Crashes of 16-Year-Old Drivers: A National Evaluation , 2006, Pediatrics.

[10]  A F Williams,et al.  Effectiveness of Ford’s belt reminder system in increasing seat belt use , 2002, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.

[11]  Anne T McCartt,et al.  Implementation of Washington State's Zero Tolerance Law: Patterns of Arrests, Dispositions, and Recidivism , 2007, Traffic injury prevention.

[12]  Daniel R Mayhew,et al.  Changes in collision rates among novice drivers during the first months of driving. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  Allan F Williams,et al.  Graduated driver licensing research, 2007-present: a review and commentary. , 2010, Journal of safety research.

[14]  Alexander C Wagenaar,et al.  Effects of legal BAC limits on fatal crash involvement: analyses of 28 states from 1976 through 2002. , 2007, Journal of safety research.

[15]  P. Young,et al.  Time series analysis, forecasting and control , 1972, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[16]  Tara Kelley-Baker,et al.  Female involvement in fatal crashes: increasingly riskier or increasingly exposed? , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[17]  Keli A Braitman,et al.  Graduated Licensing Laws and Fatal Crashes of Teenage Drivers: A National Study , 2010, Traffic injury prevention.

[18]  J. Goldberg Economic impact of motor vehicle crashes. , 2002, Annals of Emergency Medicine.

[19]  Narelle L. Haworth,et al.  Young driver research: Where are we now? What do we still need to know? , 2004 .

[20]  A Scott Tippetts,et al.  Assessing the effectiveness of minimum legal drinking age and zero tolerance laws in the United States. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  David C Grabowski,et al.  Graduated driver licensing and teen traffic fatalities. , 2005, Journal of health economics.

[22]  Guohua Li,et al.  National Evaluation of Graduated Driver Licensing Programs , 2006 .

[23]  James Hedlund,et al.  Graduated driver licensing and teenage driver research in 2006. , 2006, Journal of safety research.

[24]  S. Masten,et al.  Teenage Driver Risks and Interventions , 2004 .

[25]  Susan A. Fleming Teen Driver Safety: Additional Research Could Help States Strengthen Graduated Driver Licensing Systems. Report to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and Its Subcommittee on Highways and Transit, House of Representatives. GAO-10-544. , 2010 .

[26]  James Hedlund,et al.  Graduated driver licensing research in 2003 and beyond. , 2004, Journal of safety research.

[27]  Anne T McCartt,et al.  Driving experience, crashes and traffic citations of teenage beginning drivers. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[28]  Gwilym M. Jenkins,et al.  Time series analysis, forecasting and control , 1972 .

[29]  Scott V Masten,et al.  The Effectiveness of Home-Study Driver Education Compared to Classroom Instruction: The Impact on Student Knowledge and Attitudes , 2004, Traffic injury prevention.

[30]  Rajesh Subramanian,et al.  Motor Vehicle Traffic Crashes as a Leading Cause of Death in the United States, 2006 , 2003 .