Sound Segregation via Embedded Repetition Is Robust to Inattention

The segregation of sound sources from the mixture of sounds that enters the ear is a core capacity of human hearing, but the extent to which this process is dependent on attention remains unclear. This study investigated the effect of attention on the ability to segregate sounds via repetition. We utilized a dual task design in which stimuli to be segregated were presented along with stimuli for a “decoy” task that required continuous monitoring. The task to assess segregation presented a target sound 10 times in a row, each time concurrent with a different distractor sound. McDermott, Wrobleski, and Oxenham (2011) demonstrated that repetition causes the target sound to be segregated from the distractors. Segregation was queried by asking listeners whether a subsequent probe sound was identical to the target. A control task presented similar stimuli but probed discrimination without engaging segregation processes. We present results from 3 different decoy tasks: a visual multiple object tracking task, a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) digit encoding task, and a demanding auditory monitoring task. Load was manipulated by using high- and low-demand versions of each decoy task. The data provide converging evidence of a small effect of attention that is nonspecific, in that it affected the segregation and control tasks to a similar extent. In all cases, segregation performance remained high despite the presence of a concurrent, objectively demanding decoy task. The results suggest that repetition-based segregation is robust to inattention.

[1]  Josh H. McDermott,et al.  Attentive Tracking of Sound Sources , 2015, Current Biology.

[2]  Andrew R. Dykstra,et al.  Interaction of Streaming and Attention in Human Auditory Cortex , 2015, PloS one.

[3]  Nilli Lavie,et al.  Load-induced inattentional deafness , 2014, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[4]  Mounya Elhilali,et al.  Investigating the Neural Correlates of a Streaming Percept in an Informational-Masking Paradigm , 2014, PloS one.

[5]  Lana M Trick,et al.  Multiple-object tracking while driving: the multiple-vehicle tracking task , 2014, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[6]  D. Beck,et al.  Blinded by the load: attention, awareness and the role of perceptual load , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  Brian A. Metzger,et al.  Effects of attention to and awareness of preceding context tones on auditory streaming. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  Alexandra Bendixen,et al.  Predictability effects in auditory scene analysis: a review , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[9]  Satu Palva,et al.  Load Dependence of β and γ Oscillations Predicts Individual Capacity of Visual Attention , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  Sandra Murphy,et al.  Perceptual load does not modulate auditory distractor processing , 2013, Cognition.

[11]  Sonja A. Kotz,et al.  Using a staircase procedure for the objective measurement of auditory stream integration and segregation thresholds , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[12]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  Lexical Influences on Auditory Streaming , 2013, Current Biology.

[13]  C. Feria.  Speed has an effect on multiple-object tracking independently of the number of close encounters between targets and distractors , 2013, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[14]  J. Simon,et al.  Emergence of neural encoding of auditory objects while listening to competing speakers , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  David McAlpine,et al.  Cortical responses to changes in acoustic regularity are differentially modulated by attentional load , 2012, NeuroImage.

[16]  Melissa K. Gregg,et al.  Attention, Awareness, and the Perception of Auditory Scenes , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[17]  Maria Chait,et al.  The role of temporal regularity in auditory segregation , 2011, Hearing Research.

[18]  R. Carlyon,et al.  An objective measurement of the build-up of auditory streaming and of its modulation by attention. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  D. Burr,et al.  Vision and Audition Do Not Share Attentional Resources in Sustained Tasks , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[20]  S. Shamma,et al.  Temporal coherence and attention in auditory scene analysis , 2011, Trends in Neurosciences.

[21]  S. Hochstein,et al.  Hearing While Blinking: Multisensory Attentional Blink Revisited , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  Josh H McDermott,et al.  Recovering sound sources from embedded repetition , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Shaul Hochstein,et al.  Momentary Fluctuations in Allocation of Attention: Cross-modal Effects of Visual Task Load on Auditory Discrimination , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  Frédéric Berthommier,et al.  Effect of rhythmic attention on the segregation of interleaved melodies. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  Daniel Pressnitzer,et al.  Rapid Formation of Robust Auditory Memories: Insights from Noise , 2010, Neuron.

[26]  Daniel Pressnitzer,et al.  Fundamental differences in change detection between vision and audition , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  Q. Summerfield,et al.  Concurrent sound segregation based on inharmonicity and onset asynchrony , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[28]  Robert T. Knight,et al.  Load effects in auditory selective attention: Evidence for distinct facilitation and inhibition mechanisms , 2010, NeuroImage.

[29]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Temporal dynamics of selective attention during dichotic listening. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[30]  Matthew M. Doran,et al.  The role of visual attention in multiple object tracking: Evidence from ERPs , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[31]  Josh H. McDermott.  The cocktail party problem , 2009, Current Biology.

[32]  Charles Spence,et al.  The role of working memory in auditory selective attention , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[33]  D. Somers,et al.  Effects of target enhancement and distractor suppression on multiple object tracking capacity. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[34]  C Büchel,et al.  Perceptual load interacts with stimulus processing across sensory modalities , 2009, The European journal of neuroscience.

[35]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  The effect of non-visual working memory load on top-down modulation of visual processing , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  S. Shamma,et al.  Interaction between Attention and Bottom-Up Saliency Mediates the Representation of Foreground and Background in an Auditory Scene , 2009, PLoS biology.

[37]  T. Horowitz,et al.  Attentional enhancement during multiple-object tracking , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[38]  C. Collin,et al.  The influence of strongly focused visual attention on the detection of change in an auditory pattern , 2008, Brain Research.

[39]  Adriane E. Seiffert,et al.  Attentional costs in multiple-object tracking , 2008, Cognition.

[40]  Erich Schröger,et al.  Memory trace formation for abstract auditory features and its consequences in different attentional contexts , 2008, Biological Psychology.

[41]  Carles Escera,et al.  When Loading Working Memory Reduces Distraction: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evidence from an Auditory-Visual Distraction Paradigm , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[42]  A. Oxenham,et al.  Neural Correlates of Auditory Perceptual Awareness under Informational Masking , 2008, PLoS biology.

[43]  Bradley R. Buchsbaum,et al.  The Search for the Phonological Store: From Loop to Convolution , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[44]  M. D’Esposito.  Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[45]  E. Sussman.  A New View on the MMN and Attention Debate The Role of Context in Processing Auditory Events , 2007 .

[46]  R. Näätänen,et al.  The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: A review , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[47]  George A Alvarez,et al.  How many objects can you track? Evidence for a resource-limited attentive tracking mechanism. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[48]  Erich Schröger,et al.  Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: Elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention , 2007, Brain Research.

[49]  O. Bertrand,et al.  Effects of Selective Attention on the Electrophysiological Representation of Concurrent Sounds in the Human Auditory Cortex , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[50]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  ECVP '07 Abstracts , 2007, Perception.

[51]  Nilli Lavie,et al.  The role of perceptual load in inattentional blindness , 2007, Cognition.

[52]  Peng Yuan,et al.  The effect of visuospatial attentional load on the processing of irrelevant acoustic distractors , 2006, NeuroImage.

[53]  M. Woldorff,et al.  Attentional capacity for processing concurrent stimuli is larger across sensory modalities than within a modality. , 2006, Psychophysiology.

[54]  I. Winkler,et al.  The role of predictive models in the formation of auditory streams , 2006, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[55]  A. Muller-Gass,et al.  The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity , 2006, Brain Research.

[56]  Terence W. Picton,et al.  Effects of Attention on Neuroelectric Correlates of Auditory Stream Segregation , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[57]  Massimiliano Valeriani,et al.  Attentional load of the primary task influences the frontal but not the temporal generators of mismatch negativity. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[58]  R. Zatorre,et al.  Attention to simultaneous unrelated auditory and visual events: behavioral and neural correlates. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[59]  Claude Alain,et al.  Effects of visual attentional load on low-level auditory scene analysis , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[60]  Jason B. Mattingley,et al.  Directed Attention Eliminates ‘Change Deafness’ in Complex Auditory Scenes , 2005, Current Biology.

[61]  N. Lavie.  Distracted and confused?: Selective attention under load , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[62]  R. Carlyon.  How the brain separates sounds , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[63]  R. Carlyon,et al.  Effects of location, frequency region, and time course of selective attention on auditory scene analysis. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[64]  Rhodri Cusack,et al.  Cross-Modal and Non-Sensory Influences on Auditory Streaming , 2003, Perception.

[65]  Claude Alain,et al.  Effects of Attentional Load on Auditory Scene Analysis , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[66]  I. Winkler,et al.  MMN and attention: competition for deviance detection. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[67]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Does auditory streaming require attention? Evidence from attentional selectivity in short-term memory. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[68]  Stephen McAdams,et al.  Schema-based processing in auditory scene analysis , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[69]  C. Frith,et al.  Processing of irrelevant visual motion during performance of an auditory attention task , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[70]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Attention Response Functions Characterizing Brain Areas Using fMRI Activation during Parametric Variations of Attentional Load , 2001, Neuron.

[71]  C. Frith,et al.  The Role of Working Memory in Visual Selective Attention , 2001, Science.

[72]  Jessica M. Foxton,et al.  Effects of attention and unilateral neglect on auditory stream segregation. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[73]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. , 2000, Annual review of neuroscience.

[74]  Stephen McAdams,et al.  Perceptual organization of complex auditory sequences: effect of number of simultaneous subsequences and frequency separation. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[75]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Spatial attention to central and peripheral auditory stimuli as indexed by event-related potentials. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[76]  M. Tervaniemi,et al.  Selective tuning of the left and right auditory cortices during spatially directed attention. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[77]  F. Bloom,et al.  Magnetoencephalographic recordings demonstrate attentional modulation of mismatch-related neural activity in human auditory cortex. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[78]  S. Stone-Elander,et al.  Coexistence of Attention-Based Facilitation and Inhibition in the Human Cortex , 1998, NeuroImage.

[79]  C. M. Marin,et al.  Concurrent vowel identification II: Effects of phase, harmonicity and task , 1997 .

[80]  Hideki Kawahara,et al.  Concurrent vowel identification. I. Effects of relative amplitude and F0 difference , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[81]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[82]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[83]  S McAdams,et al.  Identification of concurrent harmonic and inharmonic vowels: a test of the theory of harmonic cancellation and enhancement. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[84]  D. Woods,et al.  Signal clustering modulates auditory cortical activity in humans , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[85]  H S Colburn,et al.  Reducing informational masking by sound segregation. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[86]  C. Darwin,et al.  Perceptual separation of simultaneous vowels: within and across-formant grouping by F0. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[87]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Intermodal selective attention. II. Effects of attentional load on processing of auditory and visual stimuli in central space. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[88]  K. Alho,et al.  Intermodal selective attention. I. Effects on event-related potentials to lateralized auditory and visual stimuli. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[89]  Risto N t nen.  Attention and brain function , 1992 .

[90]  R. Nicolson.  Auditory Scene Analysis: the Perceptual Organization of Sound, Albert S. Bregman. MIT Press (Bradford Book), London (1990), xiii + 772 pp. c. £50, ISBN: 0-262-02297-4 , 1991 .

[91]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Modulation of early auditory processing during selective listening to rapidly presented tones. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[92]  Brian R Glasberg,et al.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data , 1990, Hearing Research.

[93]  Albert S. Bregman,et al.  The Auditory Scene. (Book Reviews: Auditory Scene Analysis. The Perceptual Organization of Sound.) , 1990 .

[94]  Z W Pylyshyn,et al.  Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. , 1988, Spatial vision.

[95]  C. Darwin.  Perceiving vowels in the presence of another sound: constraints on formant perception. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[96]  C. Darwin,et al.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section a Human Experimental Psychology Perceptual Grouping of Speech Components Differing in Fundamental Frequency and Onset-time Perceptual Grouping of Speech Components Differing in Fundamental Frequency and Onset-time , 2022 .

[97]  Lpas Vannoorden,et al.  Temporal coherence in the perception of tone sequences [doctoral dissertation , 1975 .

[98]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Electrical Signs of Selective Attention in the Human Brain , 1973, Science.