Surface modification of polypropylene microporous membrane to improve its antifouling characteristics in an SMBR: Air plasma treatment

Polypropylene hollow fiber microporous membranes (PPHFMMs) were surface-modified by air plasma treatment. Morphological changes on the membrane surface were characterized by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM). The change of surface wettability was monitored by contact angle measurements. The static water contact angle of the modified membrane reduced obviously with the increase of plasma treatment time. The relative pure water flux for the modified membranes increased with plasma treatment time up to 2 min, and then it decreased with further increase of plasma treatment time. Decreases in the tensile strength and the rate of tensile elongation at break of the modified membranes were also observed. The antifouling characteristics of the membranes in a submerged membrane-bioreactor (SMBR) for wastewater treatment were investigated. After continuous operation in the SMBR for about 110 h, flux recoveries after water and caustic cleaning are 11.66 and 34.99% higher for the 4 and 2 min air plasma treated membrane than those of the unmodified membrane. Result indicated that reversible fouling was only weakly dependent on membrane surface chemistry; in contrast, irreversible fouling exhibited a marked dependence on surface chemistry.

[1]  H. Krieg,et al.  Use of chitosan as an antifouling agent in a membrane bioreactor , 2005 .

[2]  V. M. Elinson,et al.  Water permeability of poly(ethylene) terephthalate track membranes modified in plasma , 2002 .

[3]  S. Elmaleh,et al.  Experimental test to evaluate performance of an anaerobic reactor provided with an external membrane unit , 1998 .

[4]  Sung Soo Kim,et al.  Plasma treatment of polypropylene and polysulfone supports for thin film composite reverse osmosis membrane , 2006 .

[5]  Antonio Hernández,et al.  Pore size distributions in microporous membranes. I: Surface study of track-etched filters by image analysis , 1995 .

[6]  N. Cicek,et al.  Hydrogen-dependent denitrification of water in an anaerobic submerged membrane bioreactor coupled with a novel hydrogen delivery system. , 2007, Water research.

[7]  Kyung Hyun Ahn,et al.  Membrane Filtration Characteristics in Membrane-Coupled Activated Sludge System: The Effect of Floc Structure on Membrane Fouling , 1999 .

[8]  Vinod T. Kuberkar,et al.  Modeling of fouling reduction by secondary membranes , 2000 .

[9]  E. R. Fisher,et al.  Modification of porous poly(ether sulfone) membranes by low‐temperature CO2‐plasma treatment , 2002 .

[10]  I. Gancarz,et al.  Modification of polysulfone membranes: 3. effect of nitrogen plasma , 2000 .

[11]  J. Novak,et al.  A Comparison of Membrane Bioreactor and Conventional‐Activated‐Sludge Mixed Liquor and Biosolids Characteristics , 2005, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[12]  S. Helhel,et al.  Preparation of poly(2-chloroaniline) membrane and plasma surface modification , 2006 .

[13]  Marco Foi,et al.  Characterisation of Mortar Morphology in Thin Sections by Digital Image Processing , 2005 .

[14]  D. Jeison,et al.  Cake formation and consolidation: Main factors governing the applicable flux in anaerobic submerged membrane bioreactors (AnSMBR) treating acidified wastewaters , 2007 .

[15]  Zhi-Kang Xu,et al.  Improvement of the antifouling characteristics for polypropylene microporous membranes by the sequential photoinduced graft polymerization of acrylic acid , 2006 .

[16]  A comparison of membrane bioreactor and conventional-activated-sludge mixed liquor and biosolids characteristics. , 2005 .

[17]  E. R. Fisher,et al.  Membrane Surface Modification by Plasma-Induced Polymerization of Acrylamide for Improved Surface Properties and Reduced Protein Fouling , 2003 .

[18]  E. R. Fisher,et al.  A Review of Plasma-Surface Interactions During Processing of Polymeric Materials Measured Using the IRIS Technique , 2004 .

[19]  Sung-Woon Myung,et al.  Comparison of the surface characteristics of polypropylene films treated by Ar and mixed gas (Ar/O2) atmospheric pressure plasma. , 2006, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[20]  I. Gancarz,et al.  Modification of polysulfone membranes. 4. Ammonia plasma treatment , 2002 .

[21]  F. Ding,et al.  Modification of a Membrane Surface Charge by a Low Temperature Plasma Induced Grafting Reaction and Its Application to Reduce Membrane Fouling , 2004 .

[22]  Zhi‐Kang Xu,et al.  Surface modification of polypropylene microporous membranes with a novel glycopolymer , 2005 .

[23]  Xian‐Wen Wei,et al.  Surface Modification of Poly(propylene) Microporous Membrane to Improve Its Antifouling Characteristics in an SMBR: O2 Plasma Treatment , 2008 .

[24]  Michelle L. Steen,et al.  Hydrophilic modification of polymeric membranes by low temperature H2O plasma treatment , 2002 .

[25]  Richard M. Stuetz,et al.  Characterisation of polymeric fouling in membrane bioreactors and the effect of different filtration modes , 2007 .

[26]  Kai Zhang,et al.  Effect of Permeate Flux and Tangential Flow on Membrane Fouling for Wastewater Treatment , 2005 .

[27]  Chia‐Chi Ho,et al.  Graft coupling of PEO to mixed cellulose esters microfiltration membranes by UV irradiation , 2006 .

[28]  Jiding Li,et al.  Nanofiltration membrane prepared from polyacrylonitrile ultrafiltration membrane by low-temperature plasma: I. Graft of acrylic acid in gas , 2004 .

[29]  L. Raskin,et al.  Influence of cleaning frequency and membrane history on fouling in an anaerobic membrane bioreactor , 2007 .

[30]  Pierre Le-Clech,et al.  Fouling in membrane bioreactors used in wastewater treatment , 2006 .

[31]  V. Sleptsov,et al.  Modification of track membrane structure by plasma etching , 1998 .

[32]  In-Soung Chang,et al.  Effects of membrane fouling on solute rejection during membrane filtration of activated sludge , 2001 .

[33]  Neelesh A. Patankar,et al.  On the Modeling of Hydrophobic Contact Angles on Rough Surfaces , 2003 .

[34]  R. Morent,et al.  Treatment of polymer films with a dielectric barrier discharge in air, helium and argon at medium pressure , 2007 .

[35]  K. S. Siow,et al.  Plasma Methods for the Generation of Chemically Reactive Surfaces for Biomolecule Immobilization and Cell Colonization ‐ A Review , 2006 .

[36]  Zhi-Kang Xu,et al.  Surface modification of polypropylene microporous membrane to improve its antifouling property in MBR: CO2 plasma treatment , 2005 .

[37]  A. C. Habert,et al.  Surface modification of polyurethane membranes using acrylic acid vapour plasma and its effects on the pervaporation processes , 2007 .

[38]  E. R. Fisher,et al.  Hydrophilic modification of polyethersulfone membranes by low temperature plasma-induced graft polymerization , 2002 .

[39]  M. Mercier-Bonin,et al.  How unsteady filtration conditions can improve the process efficiency during cell cultures in membrane bioreactors , 2001 .

[40]  Zhi-Kang Xu,et al.  Surface modification of polypropylene microporous membranes to improve their antifouling property in MBR: NH3 plasma treatment , 2005 .

[41]  L. Kravets,et al.  Modification of polyester track membranes by plasma treatments , 2005 .

[42]  A. Ghosh,et al.  Characterization of an anion-exchange porous polypropylene hollow fiber membrane for immobilization of ABL lipase. , 2007, Journal of biotechnology.

[43]  B. Tansel,et al.  SEM study of phenolphthalein adsorption on granular activated carbon , 2004 .

[44]  Christelle Wisniewski,et al.  Membrane bioreactor for water reuse , 2007 .

[45]  Y. Lee,et al.  Surface modification of polypropylene membranes by γ-ray induced graft copolymerization and their solute permeation characteristics , 2001 .

[46]  Sung Soo Kim,et al.  Surface modification of polypropylene membrane by low-temperature plasma treatment , 2001 .

[47]  Zhi‐Kang Xu,et al.  Enhancing the hydrophilicity of polypropylene microporous membranes by the grafting of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate via a synergistic effect of photoinitiators , 2006 .

[48]  Zhi-Kang Xu,et al.  Flux enhancement for polypropylene microporous membrane in a SMBR by the immobilization of poly(N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone) on the membrane surface , 2006 .

[49]  E. Selli,et al.  Surface modification of poly(ethylene terephthalate) fibers induced by radio frequency air plasma treatment , 2003 .

[50]  H. Kaczmarek,et al.  The influence of side groups and polarity of polymers on the kind and effectiveness of their surface modification by air plasma action , 2002 .

[51]  Thomas Arnot,et al.  Controlling fouling in membrane bioreactors operated with a variable throughput , 2002 .

[52]  I. Gancarz,et al.  Modification of polysulfone membranes 1. CO2 plasma treatment , 1999 .

[53]  Xian‐Wen Wei,et al.  Mitigated membrane fouling in an SMBR by surface modification , 2008 .

[54]  Zhi-Kang Xu,et al.  Photoinduced graft polymerization of acrylamide on polypropylene microporous membranes for the improvement of antifouling characteristics in a submerged membrane-bioreactor , 2007 .

[55]  Georges Belfort,et al.  Low fouling synthetic membranes by UV-assisted graft polymerization: monomer selection to mitigate fouling by natural organic matter , 2003 .