Exposure-based waiving under REACH.

Within the REACH framework, but also within OECD, there is understanding that for reasons of animal welfare, costs and logistics, it is important to limit the number of tests to be conducted. Exposure-based waiving (EBW) is a potentially important element in testing strategies. This publication describes criteria for exposure-based waiving as foreseen in the REACH regulation and gives more detail to the REACH requirements for exposure-based waiving The principle behind any EBW is that there are situations when human or environmental exposures are so low or infrequent that there is a very low probability that the acquisition of additional effect information may lead to an improvement in the ability to manage risk. EBW therefore is risk-based and needs thorough knowledge on exposure as well as on effects criteria. Both elements are discussed: exposure models are analysed and the uncertainty in their predictions discussed as well as no-effect criteria such as the threshold of toxicological concern. Examples of EBW are provided for environmental, consumer and worker exposure. REACH only allows EBW in a limited number of cases with constraints on tonnage levels, types of tests to be waived and the need for a thorough ES and exposure assessment throughout the life cycle of a chemical and for all human exposure routes and environmental pathways. EBW will only be considered a real option by industry if a cost-benefit analysis shows an advantage, which may heavily depend on the weighing factor one applies for the non-use of experimental animals.

[1]  Wolfgang Dekant,et al.  Application of the "threshold of toxicological concern" to derive tolerable concentrations of "non-relevant metabolites" formed from plant protection products in ground and drinking water. , 2010, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[2]  Marco Vighi,et al.  SCCP/SCHER/SCENIHR preliminary report on: the Use of the Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) Approach for the Safety Assessment of Chemical Substances , 2008 .

[3]  Andrew P. Worth,et al.  Intelligent Testing Strategies , 2007 .

[4]  Hans Kromhout,et al.  Tools for regulatory assessment of occupational exposure: development and challenges , 2007, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[5]  P Shubik,et al.  Principles for the safety evaluation of flavouring substances. , 1998, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[6]  van Engelen Jgm,et al.  Exposure informed testing under REACH , 2008 .

[7]  Inge Mangelsdorf,et al.  Evaluation of the TTC concept with the database RepDose , 2009 .

[8]  J. Hermens,et al.  Classifying environmental pollutants , 1992 .

[9]  J A Shatkin,et al.  Pharmacokinetics of the dermal route of exposure to volatile organic chemicals in water: a computer simulation model. , 1991, Environmental research.

[10]  S. Gutsell,et al.  Exposure based waiving: the application of the toxicological threshold of concern (TTC) to inhalation exposure for aerosol ingredients in consumer products. , 2009, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[11]  Helmut Greim,et al.  Application of the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) to the safety evaluation of cosmetic ingredients. , 2007, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[12]  E. Delaney,et al.  An impact analysis of the application of the threshold of toxicological concern concept to pharmaceuticals. , 2007, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[13]  S. Trapp,et al.  An unexpected challenge: ionizable compounds in the REACH chemical space , 2010 .

[14]  Martin Brunner,et al.  Favourable dermal penetration of diclofenac after administration to the skin using a novel spray gel formulation. , 2005, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[15]  T G Vermeire,et al.  Opportunities for a probabilistic risk assessment of chemicals in the European Union. , 2001, Chemosphere.

[16]  Watze de Wolf,et al.  Mode of action and aquatic exposure thresholds of no concern , 2005, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[17]  John Kingston,et al.  The development of the EASE model. , 2005, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[18]  Juha Laitinen,et al.  Task-based dermal exposure models for regulatory risk assessment. , 2006, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[19]  Lutz Müller,et al.  A rationale for determining, testing, and controlling specific impurities in pharmaceuticals that possess potential for genotoxicity. , 2006, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[20]  A G Renwick,et al.  Structure-based thresholds of toxicological concern--guidance for application to substances present at low levels in the diet. , 2005, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[21]  Wenjing Fu,et al.  Methods for estimating the bioconcentration factor of ionizable organic chemicals , 2009, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[22]  Y. Ronen Uncertainty Analysis , 1988 .

[23]  Marie E. Latulippe,et al.  Refining the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) for risk prioritization of trace chemicals in food. , 2009, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[24]  Ralph Kühne,et al.  Chemical Domain of QSAR Models from Atom-Centered Fragments , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[25]  Wouter Fransman,et al.  Stoffenmanager exposure model: development of a quantitative algorithm. , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[26]  E D Kroese,et al.  REACH, non-testing approaches and the urgent need for a change in mind set. , 2009, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[27]  Gerrit Schüürmann,et al.  Quantitative structure-activity relationships in environmental sciences, VII , 1997 .

[28]  S Jacobi,et al.  REPDOSE: A database on repeated dose toxicity studies of commercial chemicals--A multifunctional tool. , 2006, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[29]  M. Pike,et al.  A carcinogenic potency database of the standardized results of animal bioassays , 1984, Environmental health perspectives.

[30]  G Heinemeyer,et al.  European union system for the evaluation of substances: the second version. , 2005, Chemosphere.

[31]  R A Ford,et al.  Correlation of structural class with no-observed-effect levels: a proposal for establishing a threshold of concern. , 1996, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[32]  R A Ford,et al.  Estimation of toxic hazard--a decision tree approach. , 1978, Food and cosmetics toxicology.

[33]  Hans Kromhout,et al.  Conceptual model for assessment of inhalation exposure: defining modifying factors. , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[34]  G Würtzen,et al.  Threshold of toxicological concern for chemical substances present in the diet: a practical tool for assessing the need for toxicity testing. , 2000, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[35]  Antonio Franco,et al.  Estimation of the soil–water partition coefficient normalized to organic carbon for ionizable organic chemicals , 2008, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[36]  D. Dockery,et al.  Epidemiologic studies on short-term effects of low levels of major ambient air pollution components. , 1995, Environmental health perspectives.

[37]  S. Trapp,et al.  A multimedia activity model for ionizable compounds: Validation study with 2,4‐dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, aniline, and trimethoprim , 2010, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[38]  A. Bailey,et al.  A tiered approach to threshold of regulation. , 1999, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[39]  Theo Vermeire,et al.  Probabilistic Environmental Risk Assessment for Dibutylphthalate (DBP) , 2001 .

[40]  Karen Blackburn,et al.  Application of the threshold of toxicological concern approach to ingredients in personal and household care products. , 2005, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[41]  Howard I. Maibach,et al.  In Vivo Bioavailability and Metabolism of Topical Diclofenac Lotion in Human Volunteers , 1998, Pharmaceutical Research.

[42]  U. Domańska,et al.  Measurements of activity coefficients at infinite dilution of aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons, alcohols, thiophene, tetrahydrofuran, MTBE, and water in ionic liquid [BMIM][SCN] using GLC , 2009 .

[43]  I C Munro,et al.  The Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) in risk assessment. , 2008, Toxicology letters.

[44]  K Devi,et al.  Pharmacokinetic profile of a new matrix-type transdermal delivery system: diclofenac diethyl ammonium patch. , 1999, Drug development and industrial pharmacy.

[45]  S Trapp,et al.  Proposals to overcome limitations in the EU chemical risk assessment scheme. , 2000, Chemosphere.

[46]  Gregory L. Rorrer,et al.  Comprar Fundamentals of Momentum, Heat and Mass Transfer | James Welty | 9780470128688 | Wiley , 2007 .

[47]  B. Ames,et al.  Sixth plot of the carcinogenic potency database: results of animal bioassays published in the General Literature 1989 to 1990 and by the National Toxicology Program 1990 to 1993. , 1995, Environmental health perspectives.

[48]  Erik Tielemans,et al.  'Stoffenmanager', a web-based control banding tool using an exposure process model. , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[49]  Stefan Trapp,et al.  Modeling the exposure of children and adults via diet to chemicals in the environment with crop-specific models. , 2009, Environmental pollution.

[50]  M Tischer,et al.  Evaluation of the HSE COSHH Essentials exposure predictive model on the basis of BAuA field studies and existing substances exposure data. , 2003, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[51]  H. Kromhout,et al.  Cross-validation and refinement of the Stoffenmanager as a first tier exposure assessment tool for REACH , 2009, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[52]  Robert Combes,et al.  Intelligent Testing Strategies for Chemicals Testing — A Case of More Haste, Less Speed? , 2005, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[53]  W. Martin,et al.  Determination of the Transdermal Bioavailability of a Newly Developed Diclofenac Sodium Patch in Comparison with a Reference Preparation , 2005, Arzneimittelforschung.

[54]  S. Bradbury,et al.  Meeting the scientific needs of ecological risk assessment in a regulatory context. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.