Innovative order types as success factors in stock exchange competition

Through the worldwide integration of the financial markets, operators of the particular stock exchanges face an increasing competition. One—if not the most important—alternative to assure their position during this competition is the functional expansion and refinement of their trading rules (market model). However, the design of a market model is a challenging task, due to complex interdependences of the different parts of the trading rules (structural parameters). Therefore a market model cannot be planned at the drawing table and directly afterwards be built up like a house. In order to avoid bad investments, it has to be analyzed carefully, if the new designed market model possesses the required characteristics and produces the desired market outcome. In order to work out this task a prototype implementation of the market model seems to be indispensable, since such a prototype allows for testing the model by game-theoretic experiments and by simulations. In this article, we discuss the benefits, which customers obtain from using the relative or the bracket order as two examples of a functional expansion of a market model. We further augmented the market engineering tool meet2trade to support this new, innovative order types.

[1]  Maureen O'Hara,et al.  Market Microstructure Theory , 1995 .

[2]  Maureen O'Hara,et al.  Cream-Skimming or Profit-Sharing? The Curious Role of Purchased Order Flow , 1996 .

[3]  Dirk Neumann,et al.  CAME - A Tool Set for Configuring Electronic Markets , 2005, ECIS.

[4]  Beat Schmid,et al.  Elektronische Märkte - Merkmale, Organisation und Potentiale , 1999 .

[5]  Christof Weinhardt,et al.  The Montreal Taxonomy for Electronic Negotiations , 2003 .

[6]  Hans R. Stoll,et al.  The Components of the Bid-Ask Spread: A General Approach, Reviews of Financial Studies , 1997 .

[7]  Matthias Kunzelmann,et al.  Zwischen Limit und Market Order - Neue Ordertypen zur Reduktion impliziter Transaktionskosten , 2005 .

[8]  Juho Mäkiö,et al.  Electronic Negotiations - A Generic Approach with Action Systems , 2004, EC-Web.

[9]  Juho Mäkiö,et al.  A Process-Oriented Approach Towards Structured Market Modelling , 2004, FORTE Workshops.

[10]  Juho Mäkiö,et al.  meet2trade - A generic electronic trading platform , 2005 .

[11]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  A Classification Scheme for Negotiation in Electronic Commerce , 2001 .

[12]  V. Smith Microeconomic Systems as an Experimental Science , 1982 .

[13]  Robert A. Schwartz,et al.  Equity markets in action : the fundamentals of liquidity, market structure & trading , 2004 .

[14]  L. Harris Trading and Exchanges: Market Microstructure for Practitioners , 2002 .

[15]  Bruce W. Weber,et al.  Electronic Trading Systems: Strategic Implications of Market Design Choices , 1995, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[16]  Lawrence Harris,et al.  Liquidity , Trading Rules and Electronic Trading Systems , 1990 .

[17]  Michael P. Wellman,et al.  The Michigan Internet AuctionBot: a configurable auction server for human and software agents , 1998, AGENTS '98.

[18]  Manoj Kumar,et al.  Business negotiations on the Internet , 1998 .

[19]  A. Roth The Economist as Engineer: Game Theory, Experimentation, and Computation as Tools for Design Economics , 2002 .

[20]  Brad M. Barber,et al.  Online Investors: Do the Slow Die First? , 1999 .