The validity and reliability of diagnosing foot ulcers and pre-ulcerative lesions in diabetes using advanced digital photography.

BACKGROUND The goal of this study was to determine the validity and reliability of assessing the presence of plantar foot ulceration and pre-ulcerative lesions in diabetes patients from digital photographs that were produced using a new photographic foot imaging device. METHODS In 32 diabetes patients who had a foot ulcer or were at high risk of ulceration (a total of 60 feet), high-quality photographic images of the plantar foot surface were collected. Each foot was assessed live, from photographs 2 weeks later, and again 4 weeks later for the presence of an ulcer, abundant callus, or the absence of signs. Each foot was assessed by four independently operating foot care specialists. Agreement scores were calculated using κ values (range, 0-1). Sensitivity and specificity scores were also calculated. RESULTS Foot ulceration was cumulatively scored 59 times, callus 78 times, and absence of signs 149 times during live assessment. Agreement with photographic assessment was very good for ulcer (κ = 0.87) and absence of signs (κ = 0.83) and good for callus (κ = 0.61). Sensitivity and specificity were high for ulcer (88% and 98%, respectively), callus (69% and 89%, respectively), and absence of signs (both 90%). Intra-observer agreement between repeated photographic assessments was good to excellent for all outcomes and observers (κ between 0.70 and 1.00). Inter-observer agreement for photographic assessments was good for ulcer (κ = 0.72-0.88) and absence of signs (κ = 0.59-0.75) and moderate to good for callus (κ = 0.48-0.73). For live assessment, inter-observer agreement scores were only slightly higher. CONCLUSIONS The data illustrate that diabetic foot ulcers and pre-ulcerative lesions can be diagnosed in a valid and reliable manner by trained professionals from digital photographs produced with the foot imaging device. This supports the intended use of the device as a telemedical monitoring tool in the home environment for early detection of diabetic foot disease and prevention of severe complications in high-risk diabetes patients.

[1]  C. M. Agrawal,et al.  Preventing Diabetic Foot Ulcer Recurrence in High-Risk Patients , 2007, Diabetes Care.

[2]  R. Braun,et al.  Telemedical wound care using a new generation of mobile telephones: a feasibility study. , 2005, Archives of dermatology.

[3]  J. Lowery,et al.  Accuracy of a web-based system for monitoring chronic wounds. , 2003, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[4]  J. Kvedar,et al.  Telemedicine in vascular surgery: feasibility of digital imaging for remote management of wounds. , 1998, Journal of vascular surgery.

[5]  Patrick J. Heagerty,et al.  Prediction of Diabetic Foot Ulcer Occurrence Using Commonly Available Clinical Information , 2006, Diabetes Care.

[6]  Matt Elrod,et al.  Teleassessment Compared with Live Assessment of Pressure Ulcers in a Wound Clinic: A Pilot Study , 2003, Advances in skin & wound care.

[7]  Griffiths,et al.  Comparison of teleconsultations and face‐to‐face consultations: preliminary results of a United Kingdom multicentre teledermatology study , 1998, The British journal of dermatology.

[8]  D G Smith,et al.  Causal pathways for incident lower-extremity ulcers in patients with diabetes from two settings. , 1999, Diabetes care.

[9]  Robert A Lowe,et al.  Use of photographs for the identification of pressure ulcers in elderly hospitalized patients: validity and reliability , 2006, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[10]  G. Reiber,et al.  Pathways to Diabetic Limb Amputation: Basis for Prevention , 1990, Diabetes Care.

[11]  Jane Clemensen,et al.  Telemedical treatment at home of diabetic foot ulcers , 2005, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[12]  R. Horswell,et al.  The Use of Telemedicine in the Management of Diabetes-Related Foot Ulceration: A Pilot Study , 2004, Advances in skin & wound care.

[13]  Lansing G. Ellsworth,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy and image quality using a digital camera for teledermatology. , 1999, Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[14]  R. X. Murphy,et al.  The Reliability of Digital Imaging in the Remote Assessment of Wounds: Defining a Standard , 2006, Annals of plastic surgery.

[15]  A. C. Roth,et al.  Digital images in the diagnosis of wound healing problems. , 1999, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[16]  J. V. van Baal,et al.  Assessment of foot disease in the home environment of diabetic patients using a new photographic foot imaging device , 2010, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[17]  L. Uccioli,et al.  High prevalence of ischaemia, infection and serious comorbidity in patients with diabetic foot disease in Europe. Baseline results from the Eurodiale study , 2006, Diabetologia.

[18]  A. Boulton,et al.  Multicenter Study of the Incidence of and Predictive Risk Factors for Diabetic Neuropathic Foot Ulceration , 1998, Diabetes Care.

[19]  A. Boulton,et al.  The global burden of diabetic foot disease , 2005, The Lancet.

[20]  David G Armstrong,et al.  Skin temperature monitoring reduces the risk for diabetic foot ulceration in high-risk patients. , 2007, The American journal of medicine.

[21]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[22]  Jane Clemensen,et al.  A feasibility study of UMTS mobile phones for supporting nurses doing home visits to patients with diabetic foot ulcers , 2006, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[23]  J. Griffiths,et al.  The North‐West Diabetes Foot Care Study: incidence of, and risk factors for, new diabetic foot ulceration in a community‐based patient cohort , 2002, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.