Examining Students’ Algebraic Thinking in a Curricular Context: A Longitudinal Study

This chapter highlights findings from the LieCal Project, a longitudinal project in which we investigated the effects of a Standards-based middle school mathematics curriculum (CMP) on students’ algebraic development and compared them to the effects of other middle school mathematics curricula (non-CMP). We found that the CMP curriculum takes a functional approach to the teaching of algebra while non-CMP curricula take a structural approach. The teachers who used the CMP curriculum emphasized conceptual understanding more than did those who used the non-CMP curricula. On the other hand, the teachers who used non-CMP curricula emphasized procedural knowledge more than did those who used the CMP curriculum. When we examined the development of students’ algebraic thinking related to representing situations, equation solving, and making generalizations, we found that CMP students had a significantly higher growth rate on representing-situations tasks than did non-CMP students, but both CMP and non-CMP students had an almost identical growth in their ability to solve equations. We also found that CMP students demonstrated greater generalization abilities than did non-CMP students over the three middle school years.

[1]  James J. Kaput,et al.  Teaching and Learning a New Algebra , 1999 .

[2]  H. Gardner,et al.  An Exchange: The Unschooled Mind: How Children Think and How Schools Should Teach. , 1992 .

[3]  T. P. Carpenter,et al.  Thinking Mathematically : Integrating Arithmetic and Algebra in Elementary School , 2003 .

[4]  John C. Moyer,et al.  Impact of curriculum reform: Evidence of change in classroom practice in the United States , 2011 .

[5]  Anthony Orton.  Pattern in the teaching and learning of mathematics , 1999 .

[6]  J. Hiebert,et al.  Instructional Tasks, Classroom Discourse, and Students’ Learning in Second-Grade Arithmetic , 1993 .

[7]  Jere Confrey,et al.  On Evaluating Curricular Effectiveness: Judging the Quality of K-12 Mathematics Evaluations. , 2004 .

[8]  Lyn D. English,et al.  Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education , 2002 .

[9]  L. Resnick.  Learning In School and Out , 2008 .

[10]  Douglas K. Detterman,et al.  Individual Differences and Cognition , 1993 .

[11]  Rina Zazkis,et al.  Arithmetic Sequence as a Bridge between Conceptual Fields , 2002 .

[12]  J. Lave.  Cognition in Practice: Outdoors: a social anthropology of cognition in practice , 1988 .

[13]  Jose P. Mestre,et al.  Linguistic and cultural influences on learning mathematics , 1989 .

[14]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[15]  Mary Kay Stein,et al.  Building Student Capacity for Mathematical Thinking and Reasoning: An Analysis of Mathematical Tasks Used in Reform Classrooms , 1996 .

[16]  Descriptors Educational,et al.  Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association , 1998 .

[17]  Denisse R. Thompson,et al.  Standards-based school mathematics curricula : What are they? What do students learn? , 2004 .

[18]  Jinfa Cai.  Why do U.S. and Chinese students think differently in mathematical problem solving? Impact of early algebra learning and teachers' beliefs , 2004 .

[19]  L. Resnick.  The 1987 Presidential Address Learning In School and Out , 1987 .

[20]  Jinfa Cai,et al.  The teaching of equation solving: approaches in Standards-based and traditional curricula in the United States , 2010 .

[21]  Douglas T. Owens.  Research Ideas for the Classroom: Middle Grades Mathematics. , 1993 .

[22]  L. Steen.  The Science of Patterns , 1988, Science.

[23]  E. Goldenberg,et al.  Habits of mind: An organizing principle for mathematics curricula , 1996 .

[24]  Deborah Loewenberg Ball,et al.  Mathematical Proficiency for All Students: Toward a Strategic Research and Development Program in Mathematics Education , 2002 .

[25]  Walter Doyle,et al.  Work in Mathematics Classes: The Context of Students' Thinking During Instruction , 1988 .

[26]  Barbara Rogoff,et al.  What's Become of Research on the Cultural Basis of Cognitive Development?. , 1995 .

[27]  J. Mason.  Expressing Generality and Roots of Algebra , 1996 .

[28]  Kurt W. Fischer,et al.  Development in context : acting and thinking in specific environments , 1993 .

[29]  How a standards-based mathematics curriculum differs from a traditional curriculum: with a focus on intended treatments of the ideas of variable , 2009 .

[30]  C. Hirsch.  Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics , 1988 .

[31]  Carolyn Kieran,et al.  Approaches to Algebra - Perspectives for Research and Teaching , 1996 .

[32]  R. Mayer.  Educational Psychology: A Cognitive Approach , 1987 .

[33]  Lesley Lee.  An Initiation into Algebraic Culture through Generalization Activities , 1996 .

[34]  Carolyn Kieran.  The changing face of school algebra , 1998 .

[35]  Anna Sfard,et al.  The development of algebra: Confronting historical and psychological perspectives , 1995 .

[36]  Roger Howe,et al.  Mathematics Framework for the 2007 National Assessment of Educational Progress. , 2006 .

[37]  Carole Greenes.  Algebra and algebraic thinking in school mathematics , 2008 .

[38]  Douglas A. Grouws,et al.  Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning , 1992 .

[39]  J. Bruner.  Acts of meaning , 1990 .

[40]  Graham A. Jones,et al.  Elementary students’ access to powerful mathematical ideas , 2008 .

[41]  A. Su,et al.  The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics , 1932, The Mathematical Gazette.