Indoor soundscape assessment: A principal components model of acoustic perception in residential buildings

Abstract Models of perceived affective quality of soundscapes have been recently included into standards to guide the measurement and improvement of urban soundscapes. Such models have been developed in outdoor contexts and their validity in indoor built environments is unclear. A laboratory listening test was performed in a mock-up living room with a window sight, in order to develop an indoor soundscape model for residential buildings. During the test, 35 participants were asked to rate 20 different scenarios each. Scenarios were defined by combining four indoor sound sources and five urban environments, filtered through a window ajar, on 97 attribute scales. By applying principal component analysis, Comfort, Content, and Familiarity, were extracted as the main perceptual dimensions explaining respectively 58%, 25% and 7% of the total variance. Relationships between the principal component scores, acoustic parameters and indoor and outdoor sound categories were investigated. Comfort, Content, and Familiarity were found to be better predicted respectively by loudness N10, level variability LA10-LA90 and sharpness S. The magnitude of linear-mixed-effect model predictions sensibly improved by accounting for sound categories, thus pointing at the importance of semantic meaning of sounds in indoor soundscape assessment. A measurement system is proposed, based on a 2-D space defined by two orthogonal axes, Comfort and Content, and two additional axes, Engagement and Privacy – Control, rotated 45° on the same plane. The model indicates the perceptual constructs to be measured (e.g. in post-occupancy evaluations), the attribute scales to be employed and actions to improve indoor soundscape quality, thus providing a reference for both research and practice.

[1]  A. Ellaway,et al.  'Beyond Four Walls'. The Psycho-social Benefits of Home: Evidence from West Central Scotland , 2000 .

[2]  J. Russell A circumplex model of affect. , 1980 .

[3]  David Lehrer,et al.  Listening to the occupants: a Web-based indoor environmental quality survey. , 2004, Indoor air.

[4]  K. Yahiaoui,et al.  Finite element acoustic analysis of a steel stud based double-leaf wall , 2013 .

[5]  Luigi Maffei,et al.  Ten questions on the soundscapes of the built environment , 2016 .

[6]  Jian Kang,et al.  Soundscape descriptors and a conceptual framework for developing predictive soundscape models , 2016 .

[7]  Antonio Pedrero,et al.  An annoyance-related SNQ for the assessment of airborne sound insulation for urban-type sounds. , 2020 .

[8]  H. Kaiser The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor Analysis , 1960 .

[10]  André Fiebig,et al.  A Review of Socio-acoustic Surveys for Soundscape Studies , 2018, Current Pollution Reports.

[11]  Lisa Heschong,et al.  Ten questions concerning well-being in the built environment , 2020, Building and Environment.

[12]  Hui Ma,et al.  An Experimental Study: The Restorative Effect of Soundscape Elements in a Simulated Open-Plan Office , 2018 .

[13]  Valtteri Hongisto,et al.  Satisfaction with sound insulation in residential dwellings - The effect of wall construction. , 2015 .

[14]  C. Osgood The nature and measurement of meaning. , 1952, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  S Torresin,et al.  Combined effects of environmental factors on human perception and objective performance: A review of experimental laboratory works , 2018, Indoor air.

[16]  Monika Rychtarikova,et al.  Soundscape categorization on the basis of objective acoustical parameters , 2013 .

[17]  Jian Kang,et al.  Associations between Positive Health-Related Effects and Soundscapes Perceptual Constructs: A Systematic Review , 2018, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[18]  Jin Yong Jeon,et al.  Influence of urban contexts on soundscape perceptions: A structural equation modeling approach , 2015 .

[19]  An investigation of community noise in high-rise residential environments. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Brigitte Schulte-Fortkamp,et al.  Soundscape and the Built Environment , 2015 .

[21]  C. Guastavino The ideal urban soundscape : Investigating the sound quality of french cities , 2006 .

[22]  Nikolaos-Georgios Vardaxis,et al.  Review of acoustic comfort evaluation in dwellings—part I: Associations of acoustic field data to subjective responses from building surveys , 2018 .

[23]  The Warsaw soundscape - structure and specifics , 2014 .

[24]  Dick Botteldooren,et al.  Classification of soundscapes of urban public open spaces , 2019, Landscape and Urban Planning.

[25]  R Klaeboe,et al.  Soundscapes, human restoration and quality of life , 2016 .

[26]  Jian Kang,et al.  Development of Indicators for the Soundscape in Urban Shopping Streets , 2016 .

[27]  C. Osgood On the whys and wherefores of E, P, and A. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  Jian Kang,et al.  Towards soundscape indices , 2019 .

[29]  Francesco Babich,et al.  Acoustics for Supportive and Healthy Buildings: Emerging Themes on Indoor Soundscape Research , 2020 .

[30]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[31]  Jorge Cadima,et al.  Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[32]  D. Dubois,et al.  A cognitive approach to urban soundscapes : Using verbal data to access everyday life auditory categories , 2006 .

[33]  Jian Kang,et al.  Towards an Urban Vibrancy Model: A Soundscape Approach , 2018, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[34]  John L. Davy,et al.  A review of the different approaches to predict the sound transmission loss of building partitions , 2020 .

[35]  Delphine Bard,et al.  Review of acoustic comfort evaluation in dwellings: part II—impact sound data associated with subjective responses in laboratory tests , 2018 .

[36]  F. Aletta,et al.  Soundscapes of buildings and built environments , 2018, Building Acoustics.

[37]  Jian Kang,et al.  Soundscape in the sustainable living environment: A cross-cultural comparison between the UK and Taiwan. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[38]  Catherine Lavandier,et al.  A cross-national comparison in assessment of urban park soundscapes in France, Korea, and Sweden through laboratory experiments , 2018 .

[39]  John E. W. Poxon,et al.  An exploratory evaluation of perceptual, psychoacoustic and acoustical properties of urban soundscapes , 2013 .

[40]  William J. Davies,et al.  Soundscape reproduction and synthesis , 2014 .

[41]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  Trends in the living room and beyond: results from ethnographic studies using creative and playful probing , 2008, CIE.

[42]  T. Stockfelt Sound as an existential necessity , 1991 .

[43]  Ann Dupuis,et al.  Home, Home Ownership and the Search for Ontological Security , 1998 .

[44]  Uğur Beyza Erçakmak,et al.  Comparing Turkish and European Noise Management and Soundscape Policies: A Proposal of Indoor Soundscape Integration to Architectural Design and Application , 2019, Acoustics.

[45]  Ayad A Mohamed Aburawis,et al.  An integrated framework on soundscape perception and spatial experience by adapting post-occupancy evaluation methodology , 2018 .

[46]  K. Dirks,et al.  Use of Creative Writing to Develop a Semantic Differential Tool for Assessing Soundscapes , 2019, Front. Psychol..

[47]  Mei Zhang,et al.  Semantic differential analysis of the soundscape in urban open public spaces , 2010 .

[48]  Christina E. Mediastika,et al.  Appraising the sonic environment of urban parks using the soundscape dimension of visually impaired people , 2020 .

[49]  J. Scheiner,et al.  Home as a Place of Noise Control for the Elderly? A Cross-Sectional Study on Potential Mediating Effects and Associations between Road Traffic Noise Exposure, Access to a Quiet Side, Dwelling-Related Green and Noise Annoyance , 2018, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[50]  Birgitta Berglund,et al.  On a tool for measuring soundscape quality in urban residential areas , 2006 .

[51]  Cheuk Ming Mak,et al.  A systematic review of human perceptual dimensions of sound: Meta-analysis of semantic differential method applications to indoor and outdoor sounds , 2018 .

[52]  Jian Kang,et al.  Acoustic Design Criteria in Naturally Ventilated Residential Buildings: New Research Perspectives by Applying the Indoor Soundscape Approach , 2019, Applied Sciences.

[53]  D. Levitin,et al.  Ecological validity of soundscape reproduction , 2004 .

[54]  Takaya Kojima,et al.  Personal evaluation structure of environmental sounds: Experiments of subjective evaluation using subjects' own terms , 2004 .

[55]  Paul Jennings,et al.  The development and application of the emotional dimensions of a soundscape , 2013 .

[56]  Albatici,et al.  Assessment Methods and Factors Determining Positive Indoor Soundscapes in Residential Buildings: A Systematic Review , 2019, Sustainability.

[57]  S. Wiens,et al.  Stress Recovery during Exposure to Nature Sound and Environmental Noise , 2010, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[58]  P. M. Lister,et al.  A Computationally-Efficient Numerical Model to Characterize the Noise Behavior of Metal-Framed Walls , 2015 .

[59]  T. Andringa,et al.  How Pleasant Sounds Promote and Annoying Sounds Impede Health: A Cognitive Approach , 2013, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[60]  Lawrence M. Ward,et al.  The psychological representation of molar physical environments , 1981 .

[61]  Hui Ma,et al.  Restorative Effects of Classroom Soundscapes on Children’s Cognitive Performance , 2019, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[62]  J. Osborne,et al.  Sample size and subject to item ratio in principal components analysis. , 2004 .

[63]  B. Berglund,et al.  A principal components model of soundscape perception. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.