Toward freshwater plant diversity surveys with eDNA barcoding and metabarcoding

[1]  Mark A. Davis,et al.  Environmental DNA as an emerging tool in botanical research. , 2023, American journal of botany.

[2]  Rafael O. Wüest,et al.  High resolution ancient sedimentary DNA shows that alpine plant diversity is associated with human land use and climate change , 2022, Nature Communications.

[3]  F. Denoeud,et al.  Postglacial species arrival and diversity buildup of northern ecosystems took millennia , 2022, Science advances.

[4]  Jindong Zhao,et al.  Comparative Evaluation of Common Materials as Passive Samplers of Environmental DNA. , 2022, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  J. P. Maity,et al.  Environmental DNA analysis as an emerging non-destructive method for plant biodiversity monitoring: a review , 2022, AoB PLANTS.

[6]  Alice R. Jones,et al.  A targeted capture approach to generating reference sequence databases for chloroplast gene regions , 2022, Ecology and evolution.

[7]  Morgan R. Gostel,et al.  The Expanding Role of DNA Barcodes: Indispensable Tools for Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation , 2022, Diversity.

[8]  Sarah J. Bourlat,et al.  A practical guide to DNA-based methods for biodiversity assessment , 2021 .

[9]  D. Froese,et al.  Collapse of the mammoth-steppe in central Yukon as revealed by ancient environmental DNA , 2021, Nature Communications.

[10]  Satsuki Tsuji,et al.  Abundance estimation of riverine macrophyte Egeria densa using environmental DNA: effects of sampling season and location , 2021, Limnology.

[11]  K. Stoof-Leichsenring,et al.  Preservation of sedimentary plant DNA is related to lake water chemistry , 2021, Environmental DNA.

[12]  Lynsey R. Harper,et al.  The Multiple States of Environmental DNA and What Is Known about Their Persistence in Aquatic Environments , 2021, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  J. M. Macpherson,et al.  Comparing whole‐genome shotgun sequencing and DNA metabarcoding approaches for species identification and quantification of pollen species mixtures , 2021, Ecology and evolution.

[14]  B. Gemeinholzer,et al.  Internal transcribed spacer primer evaluation for vascular plant metabarcoding , 2021, Metabarcoding and Metagenomics.

[15]  Yuzhe Sun,et al.  Method for quick DNA barcode reference library construction , 2021, Ecology and evolution.

[16]  J. P. Maity,et al.  Plant-animal interactions in the era of environmental DNA (eDNA) – a review , 2021, Environmental DNA.

[17]  E. Biffin,et al.  A multi-gene region targeted capture approach to detect plant DNA in environmental samples: A case study from coastal environments , 2021, bioRxiv.

[18]  Jinmiao Zha,et al.  Estimating aquatic plant diversity and distribution in rivers from Jingjinji Region, China, using environmental DNA metabarcoding and a traditional survey method. , 2021, Environmental research.

[19]  H. Reveron,et al.  Passive sampling of environmental DNA in aquatic environments using 3D-printed hydroxyapatite samplers , 2021, bioRxiv.

[20]  D. Lodge,et al.  Diversity Metrics Are Robust to Differences in Sampling Location and Depth for Environmental DNA of Plants in Small Temperate Lakes , 2021, Frontiers in Environmental Science.

[21]  Michelle L. Hart,et al.  Barcode UK: A complete DNA barcoding resource for the flowering plants and conifers of the United Kingdom , 2021, Molecular ecology resources.

[22]  Arne J. Beermann,et al.  Beyond fish eDNA metabarcoding: Field replicates disproportionately improve the detection of stream associated vertebrate species , 2021, bioRxiv.

[23]  Bessey Cindy,et al.  Passive eDNA collection enhances aquatic biodiversity analysis. , 2021, Communications biology.

[24]  Matthew G. Johnson,et al.  A Comprehensive Phylogenomic Platform for Exploring the Angiosperm Tree of Life , 2021, bioRxiv.

[25]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Lake Sedimentary DNA Research on Past Terrestrial and Aquatic Biodiversity: Overview and Recommendations , 2021, Quaternary.

[26]  Y. Isagi,et al.  Detection of Endangered Aquatic Plants in Rapid Streams Using Environmental DNA , 2021, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution.

[27]  Mark D. Johnson,et al.  Airborne eDNA Reflects Human Activity and Seasonal Changes on a Landscape Scale , 2021, Frontiers in Environmental Science.

[28]  Sara M. Handy,et al.  HPLC-UV, Metabarcoding and Genome Skims of Botanical Dietary Supplements: A Case Study in Echinacea , 2021, Planta Medica.

[29]  O. Monnier,et al.  Exploring the capacity of aquatic biofilms to act as environmental DNA samplers: Test on macroinvertebrate communities in rivers. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[30]  L. Bernatchez,et al.  The future of biodiversity monitoring and conservation utilizing environmental DNA , 2020, Environmental DNA.

[31]  Alan R. Smith,et al.  A taxonomic and molecular survey of the pteridophytes of the Nectandra Cloud Forest Reserve, Costa Rica , 2020, PloS one.

[32]  M. Miya,et al.  Determining an effective sampling method for eDNA metabarcoding: a case study for fish biodiversity monitoring in a small, natural river , 2020, Limnology.

[33]  C. Sobek,et al.  Square salads: exploring the diet of the southern hairy-nosed wombat (Lasiorhinus latifrons) via DNA metabarcoding , 2020 .

[34]  A. Keller,et al.  Employing DNA metabarcoding to determine the geographical origin of honey , 2020, Heliyon.

[35]  P. Prombutara,et al.  DNA metabarcoding to unravel plant species composition in selected herbal medicines on the National List of Essential Medicines (NLEM) of Thailand , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[36]  H. Doi,et al.  Broad-scale detection of environmental DNA for an invasive macrophyte and the relationship between DNA concentration and coverage in rivers , 2020 .

[37]  Y. Akamatsu,et al.  Application of environmental DNA methods for the detection and abundance estimation of invasive aquatic plant Egeria densa in lotic habitats , 2020, Limnology.

[38]  M. Adame,et al.  Potential Pollution Sources from Agricultural Activities on Tropical Forested Floodplain Wetlands Revealed by Soil eDNA , 2020, Forests.

[39]  F. Rasambainarivo,et al.  Next-generation technologies applied to age-old challenges in Madagascar , 2020, Conservation Genetics.

[40]  M. Miya,et al.  An illustrated manual for environmental DNA research: Water sampling guidelines and experimental protocols , 2020 .

[41]  J. Freeland,et al.  Development of an environmental DNA metabarcoding assay for aquatic vascular plant communities , 2020 .

[42]  B. Gemeinholzer,et al.  Plant DNA barcoding necessitates marker-specific efforts to establish more comprehensive reference databases. , 2020, Genome.

[43]  J. Olden,et al.  Use of environmental DNA to detect the invasive aquatic plants Myriophyllum spicatum and Egeria densa in lakes , 2020, Freshwater Science.

[44]  J. Olden,et al.  Development of a quantitative PCR assay for detecting Egeria densa in environmental DNA samples , 2020, Conservation Genetics Resources.

[45]  Luca Carraro,et al.  How to design optimal eDNA sampling strategies for biomonitoring in river networks , 2020, bioRxiv.

[46]  Emma K Timpano,et al.  Optimization of the second internal transcribed spacer (ITS2) for characterizing land plants from soil , 2020, PloS one.

[47]  Richard T. Corlett,et al.  Applications of environmental DNA (eDNA) in ecology and conservation: opportunities, challenges and prospects , 2020, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[48]  A. Zhang,et al.  Sixteen Years of DNA Barcoding in China: What Has Been Done? What Can Be Done? , 2020, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution.

[49]  H. Doi,et al.  Degradation modeling of water environmental DNA: Experiments on multiple DNA sources in pond and seawater , 2020, bioRxiv.

[50]  B. K. Ellis,et al.  Increased eDNA detection sensitivity using a novel high‐volume water sampling method , 2020 .

[51]  F. Denoeud,et al.  The Treasure Vault Can be Opened: Large-Scale Genome Skimming Works Well Using Herbarium and Silica Gel Dried Material , 2020, Plants.

[52]  C. Goldberg,et al.  Spatial and temporal patterns of environmental DNA detection to inform sampling protocols in lentic and lotic systems , 2020, Ecology and evolution.

[53]  David A. Bohan,et al.  Ecosystems monitoring powered by environmental genomics: A review of current strategies with an implementation roadmap , 2020, Molecular ecology.

[54]  G. Saunders,et al.  A DNA barcode survey of marine macroalgae from Bergen (Norway) , 2019 .

[55]  Douglas B. Sponsler,et al.  MetaCurator: A hidden Markov model‐based toolkit for extracting and curating sequences from taxonomically‐informative genetic markers , 2019, Methods in Ecology and Evolution.

[56]  Matthew G. Johnson,et al.  Hyb-Seq for Flowering Plant Systematics. , 2019, Trends in plant science.

[57]  P. Kersey,et al.  Factors Affecting Targeted Sequencing of 353 Nuclear Genes From Herbarium Specimens Spanning the Diversity of Angiosperms , 2019, Front. Plant Sci..

[58]  G. Luikart,et al.  Improved detection of rare, endangered and invasive trout in using a new large‐volume sampling method for eDNA capture , 2019, Environmental DNA.

[59]  R. Erickson,et al.  Sampling Designs for Landscape‐level eDNA Monitoring Programs , 2019, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[60]  J. Schultz,et al.  BCdatabaser: on-the-fly reference database creation for (meta-)barcoding , 2019, Bioinform..

[61]  David A. Strand,et al.  Detection of an invasive aquatic plant in natural water bodies using environmental DNA , 2019, PloS one.

[62]  H. Doi,et al.  Seasonal change in environmental DNA concentration of a submerged aquatic plant species , 2019, Freshwater Science.

[63]  Mark D. Johnson,et al.  Analyzing airborne environmental DNA: A comparison of extraction methods, primer type, and trap type on the ability to detect airborne eDNA from terrestrial plant communities , 2019, Environmental DNA.

[64]  G. Rees,et al.  Environmental DNA reveals landscape mosaic of wetland plant communities , 2019, Global Ecology and Conservation.

[65]  W. Kress,et al.  Plant DNA‐barcode library and community phylogeny for a semi‐arid East African savanna , 2019, Molecular ecology resources.

[66]  M. Väliranta,et al.  Shotgun Environmental DNA, Pollen, and Macrofossil Analysis of Lateglacial Lake Sediments From Southern Sweden , 2019, Front. Ecol. Evol..

[67]  Kelly A Meiklejohn,et al.  Assessment of BOLD and GenBank – Their accuracy and reliability for the identification of biological materials , 2019, PloS one.

[68]  O. Evrard,et al.  Environmental DNA provides information on sediment sources: A study in catchments affected by Fukushima radioactive fallout. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[69]  Alexander M. Weigand,et al.  DNA barcode reference libraries for the monitoring of aquatic biota in Europe: Gap-analysis and recommendations for future work , 2019, bioRxiv.

[70]  Kareem A. Mosa,et al.  The Promise of Molecular and Genomic Techniques for Biodiversity Research and DNA Barcoding of the Arabian Peninsula Flora , 2019, Front. Plant Sci..

[71]  Y. Vigouroux,et al.  Long‐fragment targeted capture for long‐read sequencing of plastomes , 2018, Applications in plant sciences.

[72]  D. Gernandt,et al.  Plant core DNA barcode performance at a local scale: identification of the conifers of the state of Hidalgo, Mexico , 2018, Systematics and Biodiversity.

[73]  Samuele Bovo,et al.  Shotgun metagenomics of honey DNA: Evaluation of a methodological approach to describe a multi-kingdom honey bee derived environmental DNA signature , 2018, PloS one.

[74]  Dianxiang Zhang,et al.  DNA barcoding the flowering plants from the tropical coral islands of Xisha (China) , 2018, Ecology and evolution.

[75]  Lynsey R. Harper,et al.  Prospects and challenges of environmental DNA (eDNA) monitoring in freshwater ponds , 2018, Hydrobiologia.

[76]  Beth Shapiro,et al.  Minimizing polymerase biases in metabarcoding. , 2018, Molecular ecology resources.

[77]  Matthew G. Johnson,et al.  A Universal Probe Set for Targeted Sequencing of 353 Nuclear Genes from Any Flowering Plant Designed Using k-Medoids Clustering , 2018, bioRxiv.

[78]  Marlis R. Douglas,et al.  MrBait: universal identification and design of targeted‐enrichment capture probes , 2018, Bioinform..

[79]  W. Symondson,et al.  New universal ITS2 primers for high-resolution herbivory analyses using DNA metabarcoding in both tropical and temperate zones , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[80]  Thomas W. A. Braukmann,et al.  Finding the pond through the weeds: eDNA reveals underestimated diversity of pondweeds , 2018, Applications in plant sciences.

[81]  N. Yoccoz,et al.  Plant DNA metabarcoding of lake sediments: How does it represent the contemporary vegetation , 2018, PloS one.

[82]  D. Lodge,et al.  Environmental DNA detection of aquatic invasive plants in lab mesocosm and natural field conditions , 2018, Biological Invasions.

[83]  M. G. Campana.  BaitsTools: Software for hybridization capture bait design , 2018, Molecular ecology resources.

[84]  R. Harbert.  Algorithms and strategies in short‐read shotgun metagenomic reconstruction of plant communities , 2018, Applications in plant sciences.

[85]  C. Goldberg,et al.  An analytical framework for estimating aquatic species density from environmental DNA , 2018, Ecology and evolution.

[86]  Jeremy R. deWaard,et al.  Using herbarium-derived DNAs to assemble a large-scale DNA barcode library for the vascular plants of Canada1 , 2017, Applications in Plant Sciences.

[87]  Kristy Deiner,et al.  Environmental DNA metabarcoding: Transforming how we survey animal and plant communities , 2017, Molecular ecology.

[88]  Anandashankar Anil,et al.  HiCapTools: a software suite for probe design and proximity detection for targeted chromosome conformation capture applications , 2017, Bioinform..

[89]  Barbara Gravendeel,et al.  DNA metabarcoding of orchid-derived products reveals widespread illegal orchid trade , 2017, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[90]  B. Faircloth.  Identifying conserved genomic elements and designing universal bait sets to enrich them , 2017 .

[91]  Theo W. Prins,et al.  Development and validation of a multi-locus DNA metabarcoding method to identify endangered species in complex samples , 2017, GigaScience.

[92]  Berry J. Brosi,et al.  Applying pollen DNA metabarcoding to the study of plant–pollinator interactions , 2017, Applications in Plant Sciences.

[93]  Arne Ludwig,et al.  Experimental conditions improving in‐solution target enrichment for ancient DNA , 2017, Molecular ecology resources.

[94]  G. Ficetola,et al.  Ancient plant DNA in lake sediments. , 2017, The New phytologist.

[95]  Y. Yarom,et al.  Replacing Sanger with Next Generation Sequencing to improve coverage and quality of reference DNA barcodes for plants , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[96]  J. Freeland,et al.  The importance of molecular markers and primer design when characterizing biodiversity from environmental DNA. , 2017, Genome.

[97]  H. Schubert,et al.  Molecular evaluation of the validity of the morphological characters of three Swedish Chara sections: Chara, Grovesia, and Desvauxia (Charales, Charophyceae) , 2016 .

[98]  Peter M Hollingsworth,et al.  Telling plant species apart with DNA: from barcodes to genomes , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[99]  Lei Cao,et al.  Selection of a marker gene to construct a reference library for wetland plants, and the application of metabarcoding to analyze the diet of wintering herbivorous waterbirds , 2016, PeerJ.

[100]  Matthew G. Johnson,et al.  HybPiper: Extracting coding sequence and introns for phylogenetics from high-throughput sequencing reads using target enrichment1 , 2016, Applications in Plant Sciences.

[101]  D. Baird,et al.  Large-Scale Monitoring of Plants through Environmental DNA Metabarcoding of Soil: Recovery, Resolution, and Annotation of Four DNA Markers , 2016, PloS one.

[102]  H. Doi,et al.  Evaluation of the Environmental DNA Method for Estimating Distribution and Biomass of Submerged Aquatic Plants , 2016, PloS one.

[103]  Emanuel A. Fronhofer,et al.  Environmental DNA reveals that rivers are conveyer belts of biodiversity information , 2016, Nature Communications.

[104]  A. Vogler,et al.  Fecal metagenomics for the simultaneous assessment of diet, parasites, and population genetics of an understudied primate , 2016, Frontiers in Zoology.

[105]  B. Brosi,et al.  Pollen DNA barcoding: current applications and future prospects. , 2016, Genome.

[106]  Pierre Taberlet,et al.  From barcodes to genomes: extending the concept of DNA barcoding , 2016, Molecular ecology.

[107]  D. Serre,et al.  In silico assessment of primers for eDNA studies using PrimerTree and application to characterize the biodiversity surrounding the Cuyahoga River , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[108]  Satoshi Yamamoto,et al.  Use of environmental DNA to survey the distribution of an invasive submerged plant in ponds , 2016, Freshwater Science.

[109]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Next‐generation monitoring of aquatic biodiversity using environmental DNA metabarcoding , 2016, Molecular ecology.

[110]  C. Kidner,et al.  Using targeted enrichment of nuclear genes to increase phylogenetic resolution in the neotropical rain forest genus Inga (Leguminosae: Mimosoideae) , 2015, Front. Plant Sci..

[111]  J. Freeland,et al.  Development of species-specific environmental DNA (eDNA) markers for invasive aquatic plants , 2015 .

[112]  S. Schneider,et al.  DNA barcoding the genus Chara: molecular evidence recovers fewer taxa than the classical morphological approach , 2015, Journal of phycology.

[113]  Kristy Deiner,et al.  Special Issue Article: Environmental DNA Choice of capture and extraction methods affect detection of freshwater biodiversity from environmental DNA , 2015 .

[114]  A. Vogler,et al.  Comparing the effectiveness of metagenomics and metabarcoding for diet analysis of a leaf‐feeding monkey (Pygathrix nemaeus) , 2015, Molecular ecology resources.

[115]  Eske Willerslev,et al.  Environmental DNA - An emerging tool in conservation for monitoring past and present biodiversity , 2015 .

[116]  Shilin Chen,et al.  Plant DNA barcoding: from gene to genome , 2015, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[117]  James Haile,et al.  Ancient and modern environmental DNA , 2015, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[118]  Douglas B. Sponsler,et al.  Application of ITS2 metabarcoding to determine the provenance of pollen collected by honey bees in an agroecosystem , 2015, Applications in plant sciences.

[119]  Helen C. Rees,et al.  REVIEW: The detection of aquatic animal species using environmental DNA – a review of eDNA as a survey tool in ecology , 2014 .

[120]  M. Stech,et al.  20,000 species and five key markers: The status of molecular bryophyte phylogenetics , 2014 .

[121]  Z. Kaplan,et al.  Genome Size as a Key to Evolutionary Complex Aquatic Plants: Polyploidy and Hybridization in Callitriche (Plantaginaceae) , 2014, PloS one.

[122]  T. Jonathan Davies,et al.  Challenges to barcoding an entire flora , 2014, Molecular ecology resources.

[123]  Craig Moritz,et al.  Sequence capture using PCR‐generated probes: a cost‐effective method of targeted high‐throughput sequencing for nonmodel organisms , 2014, Molecular ecology resources.

[124]  P. Bajer,et al.  The Relationship between the Distribution of Common Carp and Their Environmental DNA in a Small Lake , 2014, PloS one.

[125]  Wenpan Dong,et al.  Discriminating plants using the DNA barcode rbcLb: an appraisal based on a large data set , 2014, Molecular ecology resources.

[126]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Fifty Thousand Years of Arctic Vegetation and Megafaunal Diet 1 Reconstruction of Arctic Vegetation from Permafrost Samples 121 , 2022 .

[127]  T. Ekrem,et al.  Restricted variation in plant barcoding markers limits identification in closely related bryophyte species , 2013, Molecular ecology resources.

[128]  L. Consaul,et al.  DNA Barcoding the Canadian Arctic Flora: Core Plastid Barcodes (rbcL + matK) for 490 Vascular Plant Species , 2013, PloS one.

[129]  W. L. Chadderton,et al.  Environmental conditions influence eDNA persistence in aquatic systems. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[130]  C. Cruaud,et al.  How Effective Are DNA Barcodes in the Identification of African Rainforest Trees? , 2013, PloS one.

[131]  Z. Kaplan,et al.  Molecular identification of hybrids from a former hot spot of Potamogeton hybrid diversity , 2013 .

[132]  David L. Erickson,et al.  Tropical Plant–Herbivore Networks: Reconstructing Species Interactions Using DNA Barcodes , 2013, PloS one.

[133]  P. Hebert,et al.  Identification of the vascular plants of Churchill, Manitoba, using a DNA barcode library , 2012, BMC Ecology.

[134]  C. Lovelock,et al.  Terrestrial–marine connectivity: Patterns of terrestrial soil carbon deposition in coastal sediments determined by analysis of glomalin related soil protein , 2012 .

[135]  Z. Kawabata,et al.  Surveillance of fish species composition using environmental DNA , 2012, Limnology.

[136]  Joel Allainguillaume,et al.  DNA Barcoding the Native Flowering Plants and Conifers of Wales , 2012, PloS one.

[137]  C. Wiuf,et al.  Monitoring endangered freshwater biodiversity using environmental DNA. , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[138]  D. Lodge,et al.  Conservation in a cup of water: estimating biodiversity and population abundance from environmental DNA , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[139]  Z. Kawabata,et al.  Estimation of Fish Biomass Using Environmental DNA , 2012, PloS one.

[140]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Carnivore diet analysis based on next‐generation sequencing: application to the leopard cat (Prionailurus bengalensis) in Pakistan , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[141]  V. I. Gusarov,et al.  New environmental metabarcodes for analysing soil DNA: potential for studying past and present ecosystems , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[142]  N. Yoccoz.  The future of environmental DNA in ecology , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[143]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Towards next‐generation biodiversity assessment using DNA metabarcoding , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[144]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Environmental DNA , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[145]  De‐Zhu Li,et al.  Comparative analysis of a large dataset indicates that internal transcribed spacer (ITS) should be incorporated into the core barcode for seed plants , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[146]  François Pompanon,et al.  Persistence of Environmental DNA in Freshwater Ecosystems , 2011, PloS one.

[147]  Damon P. Little,et al.  Choosing and Using a Plant DNA Barcode , 2011, PloS one.

[148]  C. Visvanathan,et al.  Validation of Internal Controls for Extraction and Amplification of Nucleic Acids from Enteric Viruses in Water Samples , 2011, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[149]  Qing‐Feng Wang,et al.  Testing four barcoding markers for species identification of Potamogetonaceae , 2011 .

[150]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Using next‐generation sequencing for molecular reconstruction of past Arctic vegetation and climate , 2010, Molecular ecology resources.

[151]  Jingyuan Song,et al.  Use of ITS2 Region as the Universal DNA Barcode for Plants and Animals , 2010, PloS one.

[152]  François Pompanon,et al.  An In silico approach for the evaluation of DNA barcodes , 2010, BMC Genomics.

[153]  Pierre Taberlet,et al.  ITS as an environmental DNA barcode for fungi: an in silico approach reveals potential PCR biases , 2010, BMC Microbiology.

[154]  Ting Gao,et al.  Validation of the ITS2 Region as a Novel DNA Barcode for Identifying Medicinal Plant Species , 2010, PloS one.

[155]  X. Ge,et al.  Evaluation of 10 plant barcodes in Bryophyta (Mosses) , 2010 .

[156]  R. Oliver,et al.  Carbon source accounting for fish using combined DNA and stable isotope analyses in a regulated lowland river weir pool , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[157]  Rolando Perez,et al.  Plant DNA barcodes and a community phylogeny of a tropical forest dynamics plot in Panama , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[158]  W. John Kress,et al.  A DNA barcode for land plants , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[159]  S. Graham,et al.  Are plant species inherently harder to discriminate than animal species using DNA barcoding markers? , 2009, Molecular ecology resources.

[160]  Alfried P Vogler,et al.  DNA barcoding insect–host plant associations , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[161]  P. Taberlet,et al.  DNA barcoding for ecologists. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[162]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Species detection using environmental DNA from water samples , 2008, Biology Letters.

[163]  S. Graham,et al.  Multiple Multilocus DNA Barcodes from the Plastid Genome Discriminate Plant Species Equally Well , 2008, PloS one.

[164]  Sylvie Duthoit,et al.  DNA barcoding the floras of biodiversity hotspots , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[165]  J. Silvertown.  The Evolutionary Maintenance of Sexual Reproduction: Evidence from the Ecological Distribution of Asexual Reproduction in Clonal Plants , 2008, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[166]  David L. Erickson,et al.  A Two-Locus Global DNA Barcode for Land Plants: The Coding rbcL Gene Complements the Non-Coding trnH-psbA Spacer Region , 2007, PloS one.

[167]  P. Hebert,et al.  bold: The Barcode of Life Data System (http://www.barcodinglife.org) , 2007, Molecular ecology notes.

[168]  K. Schwab,et al.  Inhibition of quantitative PCR analysis of fungal conidia associated with indoor air particulate matter , 2007 .

[169]  Thierry Vermat,et al.  Power and limitations of the chloroplast trnL (UAA) intron for plant DNA barcoding , 2006, Nucleic acids research.

[170]  Jan De Laet,et al.  Molecular phylogenetics of an aquatic plant lineage, Potamogetonaceae , 2006, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[171]  Nicolas Salamin,et al.  Land plants and DNA barcodes: short-term and long-term goals , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[172]  D. Janzen,et al.  Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[173]  Felix Gugerli,et al.  Ancient plant DNA: review and prospects. , 2005, The New phytologist.

[174]  Evelyn Camon,et al.  The EMBL Nucleotide Sequence Database , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[175]  Carsten Wiuf,et al.  Diverse Plant and Animal Genetic Records from Holocene and Pleistocene Sediments , 2003, Science.

[176]  Jeremy R. deWaard,et al.  Biological identifications through DNA barcodes , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[177]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Phylogenetic use of noncoding regions in the genus Gentiana L.: chloroplast trnL (UAA) intron versus nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer sequences. , 1996, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[178]  H. Doi,et al.  Environmental DNA analysis for estimating the abundance and biomass of stream fish , 2017 .

[179]  P. Hebert,et al.  Rapid identification of the botanical and entomological sources of honey using DNA metabarcoding. , 2017, Food chemistry.

[180]  David L. Erickson,et al.  DNA barcodes for ecology, evolution, and conservation. , 2015, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[181]  J. Zalewska-Gałosz,et al.  Hybridization in Batrachium group: Controversial delimitation between heterophyllous Ranunculus penicillatus and the hybrid Ranunculus fluitans × R. peltatus , 2015 .

[182]  M. Chase,et al.  Selection of candidate coding DNA barcoding regions for use on land plants , 2009 .

[183]  Mark W. Chase,et al.  A proposal for a standardised protocol to barcode all land plants , 2007 .

[184]  J. Pires,et al.  Family-level relationships of Onagraceae based on chloroplast rbcL and ndhF data. , 2003, American journal of botany.

[185]  T. White.  Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics , 1990 .