Population Viability Analysis of American Ginseng and Wild Leek Harvested in Stochastic Environments

Many populations of threatened American ginseng (Panax quinquefolium) and vulnerable wild leek (Allium tricoccum) have declined and gone extinct because of overharvesting in Canada. We assessed the impact of harvesting on populations of these species in stochastically varying environments and estimated their extinction thresholds and minimum viable populations. With both species we used four transition ma- trices taken from the literature in stochastic population projections under various harvesting regimes. For American gingseng the mean population growth rate (A) declined with increasing harvesting rate (h) accord- ing to the number of years between harvests (tr), as -0.54 h tr0-( 909. When plants with more than two leaves are harvested every 5 years, a harvest rate of approximately 30% was sufficient to bring the A below the equi- librium value of 1.0. Extinction thresholds, the minimum number of plants needed to rebuild a population, varied from 30 to 90 plants, and the minimum viable population size was estimated at 170 plants. Only a dozen populations known in Canada exceed 170 plants, so most populations could not support any harvest- ing without serious threats to their long-term persistence. For wild leek, two harvesting strategies were identi- fied from confiscated, illegal harvests from Gatineau Park (Quebec): (1) "cboosy" harvesters collect fewer but larger bulbs, and (2) "busy" harvesters collect numerous but smaller bulbs. These data allowed simulations of more-realistic harvesting strategies. The rate of the decline A along the harvest gradient was faster for wild leek than for ginseng and varied with harvesting strategies. At harvesting rates between I and 8% the proba- bility that A falls below the equilibrium value was less than 5%. The extinction threshold of wild leek was esti- mated at 140-480 plants and the minimum viable population at 300-1030 plants, according to the threshold

[1]  M. Pinard.  Impacts of stem harvesting on populations of Iriartea deltoidea (Palmae) in an extractive reserve in Acre, Brazil , 1993 .

[2]  R. Muller,et al.  The phenology, growth and ecosystem dynamics of Erythronium americanum in the northern hardwood forest. , 1978 .

[3]  Daniel Gagnon,et al.  Ramet demography of Allium tricoccum, a spring ephemeral, perennial forest herb , 1993 .

[4]  Hal Caswell,et al.  Elasticity: The Relative Contribution of Demographic Parameters to Population Growth Rate , 1986 .

[5]  K. Holsinger,et al.  The application of minimum viable population theory to plants. , 1991 .

[6]  M. Boyce.  Population Viability Analysis , 1992 .

[7]  Wayne M. Getz,et al.  Population harvesting: demographic models of fish, forest, and animal resources. , 1990 .

[8]  Keith Johnson,et al.  Quasiextinction Probabilities as a Measure of Impact on Population Growth , 1982 .

[9]  M. Shaffer.  Minimum Population Sizes for Species Conservation , 1981 .

[10]  Daniel Goodman,et al.  Viable Populations for Conservation: The demography of chance extinction , 1987 .

[11]  P. Foley,et al.  Predicting Extinction Times from Environmental Stochasticity and Carrying Capacity , 1994 .

[12]  Rare,et al.  Rare vascular plants in Canada : our natural heritage , 1990 .

[13]  M. Usher,et al.  A Matrix Approach to the Management of Renewable Resources, with Special Reference to Selection Forests , 1966 .

[14]  R. May,et al.  Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[15]  L. Lefkovitch.  The study of population growth in organisms grouped by stages , 1965 .

[16]  Scott Ferson,et al.  Reconstructibility of Density Dependence and the Conservative Assessment of Extinction Risks , 1990 .

[17]  William H. Bossert,et al.  A Density-Dependent Growth Model of a Perennial Herb, Viola fimbriatula , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[18]  M. Mangel,et al.  Four Facts Every Conservation Biologists Should Know about Persistence , 1994 .

[19]  S. W. Christensen,et al.  A stochastic age-structured population model of striped bass (Morone saxatilis) in the Potomac River , 1983 .

[20]  Eric S. Menges,et al.  Population Viability Analysis for an Endangered Plant , 1990 .

[21]  R. Lande,et al.  Extinction dynamics of age-structured populations in a fluctuating environment. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  G. Belovsky,et al.  Management of Small Populations: Concepts Affecting the Recovery of Endangered Species , 1994 .

[23]  Ingrid M. Parker,et al.  Evaluating approaches to the conservation of rare and endangered plants , 1994 .

[24]  R. Lande.  Risks of Population Extinction from Demographic and Environmental Stochasticity and Random Catastrophes , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[25]  P. Fiedler,et al.  Life history and population dynamics of rare and common mariposa lilies (Calochortus Pursh: Liliaceae). , 1987 .

[26]  M. Gilpin,et al.  Minimum viable populations : Processes of species extinction , 1986 .

[27]  Miguel Franco,et al.  comparative plant demography - relative importance of life-cycle components to the finite rate of increase in woody and herbaceous perennials , 1993 .