Feasibility of Busulfan Melphalan and Stem Cell Rescue After 131I-MIBG and Topotecan Therapy for Refractory or Relapsed Metastatic Neuroblastoma: The French Experience

High-risk neuroblastoma is characterized by poor long-term survival, especially for very high-risk (VHR) patients (poor response of metastases after induction therapy). The benefits of a tandem high-dose therapy and hematologic stem cell reinfusion (HSCR) have been shown in these patients. Further dose escalation will be limited by toxicity. It is thus important to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the addition of new agents such as 131I-MIBG (131Iode metaiodobenzylguanidine) to be combined with high-dose therapy in the consolidation phase. We report the feasibility of busulfan/melphalan (BuMel) after 131I-MIBG therapy with HSCR in patients with refractory or relapsed metastatic neuroblastoma. From November 2008 to March 2015, 9 patients received BuMel after 131I-MIBG therapy and topotecan. The main toxicity was digestive with only 1 patient developing grade 4 sinusoidal obstructive syndrome. Seven patients are alive at a median follow-up of 25 months. Among them, 2 are in ongoing complete remission and 1 in ongoing stable disease. These results suggest that BuMel with HSCR can be administered safely 2 months after 131I-MIBG therapy associated with topotecan for VHR patients. This strategy will be compared with tandem high-dose chemotherapy (thiotepa and busulfan-melphalan), followed by HSCR in the upcoming SIOPEN VHR Neuroblastoma Protocol.

[1]  A. Naranjo,et al.  Validation of the mIBG skeletal SIOPEN scoring method in two independent high-risk neuroblastoma populations: the SIOPEN/HR-NBL1 and COG-A3973 trials , 2018, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[2]  K. McHugh,et al.  Revisions to the International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria: A Consensus Statement From the National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Planning Meeting. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  Günter Schreier,et al.  Busulfan and melphalan versus carboplatin, etoposide, and melphalan as high-dose chemotherapy for high-risk neuroblastoma (HR-NBL1/SIOPEN): an international, randomised, multi-arm, open-label, phase 3 trial. , 2017, The Lancet. Oncology.

[4]  A. Naranjo,et al.  A phase III randomized clinical trial (RCT) of tandem myeloablative autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) using peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) as consolidation therapy for high-risk neuroblastoma (HR-NB): A Children's Oncology Group (COG) study. , 2016 .

[5]  P. Blanchard,et al.  Busulfan–melphalan in high-risk neuroblastoma: the 30-year experience of a single institution , 2016, Bone Marrow Transplantation.

[6]  S. Clisant,et al.  HIGH-DOSE 131I-MIBG THERAPIES IN CHILDREN: FEASIBILITY, PATIENT DOSIMETRY AND RADIATION EXPOSURE TO WORKERS AND FAMILY CAREGIVERS , 2016, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[7]  C. Dufour,et al.  Tandem high-dose chemotherapy with thiotepa and busulfan–melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation in very high-risk neuroblastoma patients , 2016, Bone Marrow Transplantation.

[8]  S. Groshen,et al.  131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine with intensive chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation for high-risk neuroblastoma. A new approaches to neuroblastoma therapy (NANT) phase II study. , 2015, Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

[9]  J. Maris,et al.  Reply to N.-K.V. Cheung et al. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  I. Ostrovnaya,et al.  When overall survival fails to confirm event-free survival, should the latter be used to set the standard of care? , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  G. Le Teuff,et al.  Long‐term results of the combination of the N7 induction chemotherapy and the busulfan‐melphalan high dose chemotherapy , 2014, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[12]  A. Naranjo,et al.  Validation of Postinduction Curie Scores in High-Risk Neuroblastoma: A Children’s Oncology Group and SIOPEN Group Report on SIOPEN/HR-NBL1 , 2014, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[13]  M. Gaze,et al.  A systematic review of 131I-meta iodobenzylguanidine molecular radiotherapy for neuroblastoma. , 2014, European journal of cancer.

[14]  John M Maris,et al.  Purged versus non-purged peripheral blood stem-cell transplantation for high-risk neuroblastoma (COG A3973): a randomised phase 3 trial. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.

[15]  R. Hawkins,et al.  131I‐MIBG followed by consolidation with busulfan, melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation for refractory neuroblastoma , 2013, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[16]  A. Naranjo,et al.  Semiquantitative mIBG Scoring as a Prognostic Indicator in Patients with Stage 4 Neuroblastoma: A Report from the Children’s Oncology Group , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  M. Gaze,et al.  Optimization of molecular radiotherapy with [131I]-meta Iodobenzylguanidine for high-risk neuroblastoma. , 2013, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of....

[18]  F. Berthold,et al.  Iodine-123 metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy scoring allows prediction of outcome in patients with stage 4 neuroblastoma: results of the Cologne interscore comparison study. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  K. Matthay,et al.  Long-term results for children with high-risk neuroblastoma treated on a randomized trial of myeloablative therapy followed by 13-cis-retinoic acid: a children's oncology group study. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  J. Grill,et al.  Sequential high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue for children with high-risk medulloblastoma and supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumours , 2008 .

[21]  S. Groshen,et al.  Phase I dose escalation of iodine-131-metaiodobenzylguanidine with myeloablative chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation in refractory neuroblastoma: a new approaches to Neuroblastoma Therapy Consortium Study. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  F. Berthold,et al.  Myeloablative megatherapy with autologous stem-cell rescue versus oral maintenance chemotherapy as consolidation treatment in patients with high-risk neuroblastoma: a randomised controlled trial. , 2005, The Lancet. Oncology.

[23]  S. Cotterill,et al.  High dose melphalan in the treatment of advanced neuroblastoma: Results of a randomised trial (ENSG‐1) by the European Neuroblastoma Study Group , 2005, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[24]  G. Vassal,et al.  Consolidation with a busulfan-containing regimen followed by stem cell transplantation in infants with poor prognosis stage 4 neuroblastoma , 2000, Bone Marrow Transplantation.

[25]  L. Madero,et al.  High-dose busulfan/melphalan as conditioning for autologous PBPC transplantation in pediatric patients with solid tumors , 1999, Bone Marrow Transplantation.

[26]  D. Stram,et al.  Metastatic sites in stage IV and IVS neuroblastoma correlate with age, tumor biology, and survival. , 1999, Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology.

[27]  B. Hero,et al.  Treatment of neuroblastoma stage 4 with 131I-meta-iodo-benzylguanidine, high-dose chemotherapy and immunotherapy. A pilot study. , 1998, European journal of cancer.

[28]  M. Nigro,et al.  Place of meta-[131I]iodobenzylguanidine in the treatment of neuroblastoma: the Genoa experience. , 1995, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology.

[29]  I. Francis,et al.  Long-term results of [131I]metaiodobenzylguanidine treatment of refractory advanced neuroblastoma. , 1991, Journal of nuclear biology and medicine.

[30]  D. Niethammer,et al.  SCINTIGRAPHIC IMAGING OF NEUROBLASTOMA WITH [131I]IODOBENZYLGUANIDINE , 1984, The Lancet.

[31]  B. Hasegawa,et al.  Phase I dose escalation of 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine with autologous bone marrow support in refractory neuroblastoma. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[32]  A. Barrett,et al.  Multi-modality megatherapy with [131I]meta-iodobenzylguanidine, high dose melphalan and total body irradiation with bone marrow rescue: feasibility study of a new strategy for advanced neuroblastoma. , 1995, European journal of cancer.