The targeting pathway of Escherichia coli presecretory and integral membrane proteins is specified by the hydrophobicity of the targeting signal

Previous studies have demonstrated that presecretory proteins such as maltose binding protein (MBP) and outer membrane protein A (OmpA) are targeted to the Escherichia coli inner membrane by the molecular chaperone SecB, but that integral membrane proteins are targeted by the signal recognition particle (SRP). In vitro studies have suggested that trigger factor binds to a sequence near the N terminus of the mature region of OmpA and shunts the protein into the SecB pathway by blocking an interaction between SRP and the signal peptide. By contrast, we have found that the targeting pathway of a protein under physiological conditions is dictated by the composition of its targeting signal. Replacement of the MBP or OmpA signal peptide with the first transmembrane segment of AcrB abolished the dependence on SecB for transport and rerouted both proteins into the SRP targeting pathway. More modest alterations of the MBP signal peptide that simply increase its hydrophobicity also promoted SRP binding. Furthermore, we obtained evidence that SRP has a low affinity for typical signal peptides in vivo. These results imply that different classes of E. coli proteins are targeted by distinct pathways because bacterial SRP binds to a more restricted range of targeting signals than its eukaryotic counterpart.

[1]  Peter Walter,et al.  Model for signal sequence recognition from amino-acid sequence of 54K subunit of signal recognition particle , 1989, Nature.

[2]  Manuel G. Claros,et al.  TopPred II: an improved software for membrane protein structure predictions , 1994, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[3]  T. Rapoport,et al.  The signal sequence of nascent preprolactin interacts with the 54K polypeptide of the signal recognition particle , 1986, Nature.

[4]  G von Heijne,et al.  Differential use of the signal recognition particle translocase targeting pathway for inner membrane protein assembly in Escherichia coli. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  P. Walter,et al.  Signal sequence recognition and protein targeting to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. , 1994, Annual review of cell biology.

[6]  J. A. Newitt,et al.  The E. coli Signal Recognition Particle Is Required for the Insertion of a Subset of Inner Membrane Proteins , 1997, Cell.

[7]  S. High,et al.  Early events in preprotein recognition in E. coli: interaction of SRP and trigger factor with nascent polypeptides. , 1995, The EMBO journal.

[8]  L. Gierasch,et al.  GTP binding and hydrolysis by the signal recognition particle during initiation of protein translocation , 1993, Nature.

[9]  A. Varshavsky,et al.  Ubiquitin‐assisted dissection of protein transport across membranes. , 1994, The EMBO journal.

[10]  V. Bankaitis,et al.  The antifolding activity of SecB promotes the export of the E. coli maltose-binding protein , 1988, Cell.

[11]  H. Bernstein,et al.  A Mutation in the Escherichia coli secY Gene That Produces Distinct Effects on Inner Membrane Protein Insertion and Protein Export* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[12]  J. A. Newitt,et al.  The Structure of Multiple Polypeptide Domains Determines the Signal Recognition Particle Targeting Requirement ofEscherichia coli Inner Membrane Proteins , 1999, Journal of bacteriology.

[13]  D. Tollervey,et al.  E. coli 4.5S RNA is part of a ribonucleoprotein particle that has properties related to signal recognition particle , 1990, Cell.

[14]  H. Koch,et al.  In vitro studies with purified components reveal signal recognition particle (SRP) and SecA/SecB as constituents of two independent protein-targeting pathways of Escherichia coli. , 1999, Molecular biology of the cell.

[15]  P. Walter,et al.  Signal sequences specify the targeting route to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[16]  Jeffrey H. Miller,et al.  A short course in bacterial genetics , 1992 .

[17]  D. Tollervey,et al.  Signal-sequence recognition by an Escherichia coli ribonucleoprotein complex , 1992, Nature.

[18]  Long-Fei Wu,et al.  Discrimination between SRP‐ and SecA/SecB‐dependent substrates involves selective recognition of nascent chains by SRP and trigger factor , 2000, The EMBO journal.

[19]  D. N. Collier,et al.  Mutations that improve export of maltose-binding protein in SecB- cells of Escherichia coli , 1989, Journal of bacteriology.

[20]  B. Dobberstein,et al.  Secretory protein translocation across membranes—the role of the ‘docking protein’ , 1982, Nature.

[21]  T. Silhavy,et al.  The E. coli ffh gene is necessary for viability and efficient protein export , 1992, Nature.

[22]  P. Walter,et al.  Photocrosslinking of the signal sequence of nascent preprolactin to the 54-kilodalton polypeptide of the signal recognition particle. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Martin Vingron,et al.  Homology of 54K protein of signal-recognition particle, docking protein and two E. coli proteins with putative GTP–binding domains , 1989, Nature.

[24]  J. Beckwith,et al.  A mutant hunt for defects in membrane protein assembly yields mutations affecting the bacterial signal recognition particle and Sec machinery. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  DnaK and DnaJ heat shock proteins participate in protein export in Escherichia coli. , 1992, Genes & development.

[26]  S. Pedersen,et al.  Concentrations of 4.5S RNA and Ffh protein in Escherichia coli: the stability of Ffh protein is dependent on the concentration of 4.5S RNA , 1994, Journal of bacteriology.

[27]  G. Blobel,et al.  Translocation of proteins across the endoplasmic reticulum. I. Signal recognition protein (SRP) binds to in-vitro-assembled polysomes synthesizing secretory protein , 1981, The Journal of cell biology.

[28]  G. von Heijne,et al.  Assembly of a cytoplasmic membrane protein in Escherichia coli is dependent on the signal recognition particle , 1996, FEBS letters.

[29]  G. von Heijne,et al.  The Escherichia coli SRP and SecB targeting pathways converge at the translocon , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[30]  P. Walter,et al.  An E. coli ribonucleoprotein containing 4.5S RNA resembles mammalian signal recognition particle. , 1990, Science.

[31]  Y. Stierhof,et al.  An outer membrane protein (OmpA) of Escherichia coli K-12 undergoes a conformational change during export. , 1986, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[32]  T. Powers,et al.  Co‐translational protein targeting catalyzed by the Escherichia coli signal recognition particle and its receptor , 1997, The EMBO journal.

[33]  P. Walter,et al.  Functional substitution of the signal recognition particle 54-kDa subunit by its Escherichia coli homolog. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  J. Beckwith,et al.  Evidence for specificity at an early step in protein export in Escherichia coli , 1985, Journal of bacteriology.