Enabling large-scale dynamic simulations and reducing model complexity of district heating and cooling systems by aggregation

Abstract District heating and cooling (DHC) systems are considered cornerstones of a future heat and cold supply due to their ability to integrate renewable and waste heat sources as well as long and short-term storage technologies and their flexibility for integration of other infrastructures. Therefore, DHC systems may represent the central hub of an interlinked overall energy system. These options nevertheless lead to a more complex system if implemented as the number of technical components and potential interactions increase and as the energy demands on the network grow. The transportation of the heat supplied to the consumers through water flow involves both time and temperature-dependent changes based on the mass flow rates and the heat losses to the surrounding from the pipes. The dynamic properties of the consumers and the distribution pipes strongly influence the operation of the district heating systems. Dynamic modeling tools are required to cope with the increasing complexities and to optimize the operation of the DHC systems by using the knowledge of time delay in the heat transport, temperature distribution and flow characteristics. Nevertheless, it is computationally challenging to simulate large-scale DHC networks dynamically. One proposed method for improvement in this context is aggregation, which simplifies the topological complexities of the original network by reducing the number of pipe junctions (branches) and pipes. This paper focuses on the analysis and evaluation of the application of two aggregation methods, the Danish and the German method, in a dynamic modelling environment and comparing the aggregation to the monitoring data of a virtual district heating network with 146 consumers and an existing district heating network with 66 consumers. These evaluations are based on comparison of the simulation results of the aggregated network with fewer consumers than the original network in terms of accuracy, information loss and computational time. The results show that the CPU time in the simulation of this network can speed up approximately more than 95% by aggregating the network down to 3 consumers without significant information loss. We will highlight the current potentials and limitations of both aggregation methods in terms of integrating them in the planning, modelling and operation of DHC systems, including the 4th generation district heating systems.

[1]  Francesco Casella,et al.  Simulation of Large-Scale Models in Modelica: State of the Art and Future Perspectives , 2015 .

[2]  Dirk Müller,et al.  Automated model generation and simplification for district heating and cooling networks , 2019, Modelica.

[3]  Gerald Schweiger,et al.  Modeling and simulation of large-scale Systems: a systematic comparison of modeling paradigms , 2019, Appl. Math. Comput..

[4]  Rasmus Søgaard Lund,et al.  Heat Roadmap Europe 4: Quantifying the Impact of Low-Carbon Heating and Cooling Roadmaps , 2018 .

[5]  Peter Wild,et al.  Thermal performance of a steady state physical pipe model for simulating district heating grids with variable flow , 2016 .

[6]  Helge V. Larsen,et al.  Simple models for operational optimisation , 2002 .

[7]  T. Fleiter,et al.  The role and costs of large-scale heat pumps in decarbonising existing district heating networks – A case study for the city of Herten in Germany , 2019, Energy.

[8]  Bernd Möller,et al.  Heat Roadmap Europe: Combining district heating with heat savings to decarbonise the EU energy system , 2014 .

[9]  Helge V. Larsen,et al.  Aggregated dynamic simulation model of district heating networks , 2002 .

[10]  G. Schweiger,et al.  District Heating Systems: An Analysis of Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats of the 4GDH , 2019, Energies.

[11]  Svend Svendsen,et al.  The status of 4th generation district heating: Research and results , 2018, Energy.

[12]  Helge V. Larsen,et al.  A comparison of aggregated models for simulation and operational optimisation of district heating networks , 2004 .

[13]  Andrea Toffolo,et al.  Simulation and analysis of a meshed district heating network , 2016 .

[14]  Jonas Allegrini,et al.  A review of modelling approaches and tools for the simulation of district-scale energy systems , 2015 .

[15]  Dirk Müller,et al.  Dynamic equation-based thermo-hydraulic pipe model for district heating and cooling systems , 2017 .

[16]  Gerald Schweiger,et al.  District energy systems: Modelling paradigms and general-purpose tools , 2018, Energy.

[17]  Sara Cosentino,et al.  Optimal operation and sensitivity analysis of a large district heating network through pod modeling , 2014 .

[18]  Helge V. Larsen,et al.  Equivalent models of district heating systems: for on-line minimization of operational costs of the complete district heating system , 1999 .

[19]  Brian Vad Mathiesen,et al.  4th Generation District Heating (4GDH) Integrating smart thermal grids into future sustainable energy systems , 2014 .

[20]  Halldór Pálsson,et al.  Methods for planning and operating decentralized combined heat and power plants , 2000 .

[21]  Gerald Schweiger,et al.  District heating and cooling systems – Framework for Modelica-based simulation and dynamic optimization , 2017 .

[22]  Vicente P. Guerrero-Bote,et al.  A new approach to the metric of journals' scientific prestige: The SJR indicator , 2010, J. Informetrics.

[23]  T. Tereshchenko,et al.  Challenges and potentials for low-temperature district heating implementation in Norway , 2018 .

[24]  Aric Hagberg,et al.  Exploring Network Structure, Dynamics, and Function using NetworkX , 2008, Proceedings of the Python in Science Conference.

[25]  Svend Svendsen,et al.  Method to investigate and plan the application of low temperature district heating to existing hydraulic radiator systems in existing buildings , 2016 .