Cross-modal links in endogenous spatial attention are mediated by common external locations: evidence from event-related brain potentials

[1]  C. Spence,et al.  Tactile-Visual Links in Exogenous Spatial Attention under Different Postures: Convergent Evidence from Psychophysics and ERPs , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  J Driver,et al.  An event-related brain potential study of cross-modal links in spatial attention between vision and touch. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[3]  C. Spence,et al.  Crossmodal links between vision and touch in covert endogenous spatial attention. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  J Driver,et al.  Selective spatial attention in vision and touch: unimodal and multimodal mechanisms revealed by PET. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Can attention be directed to opposite locations in different modalities? An ERP study , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[6]  C. Spence,et al.  Attention and the crossmodal construction of space , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  C. Spence,et al.  Cross-modal links in exogenous covert spatial orienting between touch, audition, and vision , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  E. Schröger,et al.  ERP effects of intermodal attention and cross-modal links in spatial attention. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[9]  J. Driver,et al.  Audiovisual links in endogenous covert spatial attention. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  F. Mauguière,et al.  Somatosensory responses during selective spatial attention: The N120‐to‐N140 trasition , 1995 .

[11]  Charles G. Gross,et al.  REVIEW ■ : Multiple Representations of Space in the Brain , 1995 .

[12]  C. Gross,et al.  Coding of visual space by premotor neurons. , 1994, Science.

[13]  L. M. Ward,et al.  Supramodal and modality-specific mechanisms for stimulus-driven shifts of auditory and visual attention. , 1994, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[14]  P. Michie,et al.  The effects of spatial selective attention on the somatosensory event-related potential. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[15]  R Näätänen,et al.  Small pitch separation and the selective-attention effect on the ERP. , 1986, Psychophysiology.

[16]  C. Umilta,et al.  Compatibility due to the coding of the relative position of the effectors. , 1984, Acta psychologica.

[17]  P. Michie,et al.  Selective Attention Effects on Somatosensory Event‐Related Potentials , 1984, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[18]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Selective attention to multidimensional auditory stimuli. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Spatial compatibility effects on the same side of the body midline. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  R. Andersen,et al.  Multimodal representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex and its use in planning movements. , 1997, Annual review of neuroscience.

[21]  J. Driver,et al.  Audiovisual links in exogenous covert spatial orienting , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  M. Eimer.  ERP modulations indicate the selective processing of visual stimuli as a result of transient and sustained spatial attention. , 1996, Psychophysiology.

[23]  C. Gross,et al.  The representation of extrapersonal space: A possible role for bimodal, visual-tactile neurons , 1995 .

[24]  L. G. Gawryszewski,et al.  What is crossed in crossed-hand effects? , 1986 .

[25]  M. Kinsbourne.  The mechanism of hemispheric control of the lateral gradient of attention , 1975 .