In this paper, we study the design of pulse sequences for nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy as a problem of time optimal control of the unitary propagator. Radio-frequency pulses are used in coherent spectroscopy to implement a unitary transfer between states. Pulse sequences that accomplish a desired transfer should be as short as possible in order to minimize the effects of relaxation and to optimize the sensitivity of the experiments. Here, we give an analytical characterization of such time optimal pulse sequences applicable to coherence transfer experiments in multiple-spin systems. We have adopted a general mathematical formulation, and present many of our results in this setting, mindful of the fact that new structures in optimal pulse design are constantly arising. From a general control theory perspective, the problems we want to study have the following character. Suppose we are given a controllable right invariant system on a compact Lie group. What is the minimum time required to steer the system from some initial point to a specified final point? In nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and quantum computing, this translates to, what is the minimum time required to produce a unitary propagator? We also give an analytical characterization of maximum achievable transfer in a given time for the two-spin system.
[1]
L. Shaw,et al.
System Theory.
,
1965,
Science.
[2]
B. Kostant.
On convexity, the Weyl group and the Iwasawa decomposition
,
1973
.
[3]
R. Gilmore,et al.
Lie Groups, Lie Algebras, and Some of Their Applications
,
1974
.
[4]
S. Helgason.
Differential Geometry, Lie Groups, and Symmetric Spaces
,
1978
.
[5]
Joseph A. Wolf.
Spaces of Constant Curvature
,
1984
.
[6]
G. Bodenhausen,et al.
Principles of nuclear magnetic resonance in one and two dimensions
,
1987
.
[7]
W. Warren.
Advances in magnetic and optical resonance
,
1990
.
[8]
Theodore Euclid Djaferis,et al.
System theory : modeling, analysis and control
,
1999
.
[9]
Roger W. Brockett.
Explicitly solvable control problems with nonholonomic constraints
,
1999,
Proceedings of the 38th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.99CH36304).
[10]
Navin Khaneja,et al.
On the Stochastic Control of Quantum Ensembles
,
2000
.