Assessing Linkages in Stream Habitat, Geomorphic Condition, and Biological Integrity Using a Generalized Regression Neural Network

Watershed managers often use physical geomorphic and habitat assessments in making decisions about the biological integrity of a stream, and to reduce the cost and time for identifying stream stressors and developing mitigation strategies. Such analysis is difficult since the complex linkages between reach-scale geomorphic and habitat conditions, and biological integrity are not fully understood. We evaluate the effectiveness of a generalized regression neural network (GRNN) to predict biological integrity using physical (i.e., geomorphic and habitat) stream-reach assessment data. The method is first tested using geomorphic assessments to predict habitat condition for 1,292 stream reaches from the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources. The GRNN methodology outperforms linear regression (69% vs. 40% classified correctly) and improves slightly (70% correct) with additional data on channel evolution. Analysis of a subset of the reaches where physical assessments are used to predict biological integrity shows no significant linear correlation, however the GRNN predicted 48% of the fish health data and 23% of macroinvertebrate health. Although the GRNN is superior to linear regression, these results show linking physical and biological health remains challenging. Reasons for lack of agreement, including spatial and temporal scale differences, are discussed. We show the GRNN to be a data-driven tool that can assist watershed managers with large quantities of complex, nonlinear data.

[1]  J. David Allan,et al.  Assessing Biotic Integrity of Streams: Effects of Scale in Measuring the Influence of Land Use/Cover and Habitat Structure on Fish and Macroinvertebrates , 1999, Environmental management.

[2]  D. Harper,et al.  The habitat-scale ecohydraulics of rivers , 2000 .

[3]  Suziah Sulaiman,et al.  A comparison of feed-forward back-propagation and radial basis artificial neural networks: A Monte Carlo study , 2010, 2010 International Symposium on Information Technology.

[4]  Panayiotis Diplas,et al.  Evaluating spatially explicit metrics of stream energy gradients using hydrodynamic model simulations , 2000 .

[5]  Michael T. Barbour,et al.  Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and rivers , 1989 .

[6]  Min-Kyeong Kim,et al.  Dynamics of surface runoff and its influence on the water quality using competitive algorithms in artificial neural networks , 2007, Journal of environmental science and health. Part A, Toxic/hazardous substances & environmental engineering.

[7]  J. Newbold,et al.  Riparian deforestation, stream narrowing, and loss of stream ecosystem services. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  W. Cully Hession,et al.  Influence of stream geomorphic condition on fish communities in Vermont, U.S.A. , 2006 .

[9]  C. L. Padmore The role of physical biotopes in determining the conservation status and flow requirements of British rivers , 1998 .

[10]  R. King,et al.  Considerations for analyzing ecological community thresholds in response to anthropogenic environmental gradients , 2010, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[11]  Hikmet Kerem Cigizoglu,et al.  Rainfall-Runoff Modelling Using Three Neural Network Methods , 2004, ICAISC.

[12]  A. Rosemond,et al.  Stream macroinvertebrate response to catchment urbanisation ( Georgia , , 2003 .

[13]  D. Rosgen A classification of natural rivers , 1994 .

[14]  Susan K. Jackson,et al.  The biological condition gradient: a descriptive model for interpreting change in aquatic ecosystems. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[15]  Tienfuan Kerh,et al.  Neural networks approaches for modelling river suspended sediment concentration due to tropical storms. , 2009 .

[16]  Martin P. Ward,et al.  The Role of Observer Variation in Determining Rosgen Stream Types in Northeastern Oregon Mountain Streams 1 , 2008 .

[17]  J. Webster,et al.  Patch Dynamics in Lotic Systems: The Stream as a Mosaic , 1988, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[18]  N. Poff,et al.  Physical habitat template of lotic systems: Recovery in the context of historical pattern of spatiotemporal heterogeneity , 1990 .

[19]  Hikmet Kerem Cigizoglu,et al.  Generalized regression neural network in modelling river sediment yield , 2006, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[20]  F. D. Shields,et al.  Critical Evaluation of How the Rosgen Classification and Associated “Natural Channel Design” Methods Fail to Integrate and Quantify Fluvial Processes and Channel Response 1 , 2007 .

[21]  Elif Sertel,et al.  Estimating Daily Mean Sea Level Heights Using Artificial Neural Networks , 2008 .

[22]  K. Fryirs,et al.  Linking geomorphic character, behaviour and condition to fluvial biodiversity: implications for river management , 2006 .

[23]  Bree R. Mathon ASSESSING UNCERTAINTY ASSOCIATED WITH GROUNDWATER AND WATERSHED PROBLEMS USING FUZZY MATHEMATICS AND GENERALIZED REGRESSION NEURAL NETWORKS , 2011 .

[24]  Gary Brierley,et al.  Geomorphology and River Management , 2004 .

[25]  Hikmet Kerem Cigizoglu,et al.  Generalized regression neural network in monthly flow forecasting , 2005 .

[26]  M. Palmer,et al.  The Influence of Environmental Heterogeneity on Patterns and Processes in Streams , 1997, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[27]  Donald F. Specht,et al.  A general regression neural network , 1991, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[28]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Channel-reach morphology in mountain drainage basins , 1997 .

[29]  Ozgur Kisi,et al.  Suspended sediment concentration estimation by an adaptive neuro-fuzzy and neural network approaches using hydro-meteorological data , 2009 .

[30]  Michael S. Kline,et al.  Protecting River Corridors in Vermont 1 , 2010 .

[31]  J. Gore,et al.  Hydraulic Stream Ecology: Observed Patterns and Potential Applications , 1988, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[32]  D. Sear,et al.  The geomorphological basis for classifying rivers , 1998 .

[33]  Philip D. Wasserman,et al.  Advanced methods in neural computing , 1993, VNR computer library.

[34]  Sean M. C. Smith,et al.  Hydraulic performance of a morphology‐based stream channel design , 2005 .

[35]  B. Statzner,et al.  Stream hydraulics as a major determinant of benthic invertebrate zonation patterns , 1986 .

[36]  D. Rosgen Applied River Morphology , 1996 .

[37]  E. Parzen On Estimation of a Probability Density Function and Mode , 1962 .

[38]  O. Kisi River flow forecasting and estimation using different artificial neural network techniques , 2008 .

[39]  J. Allan Landscapes and Riverscapes: The Influence of Land Use on Stream Ecosystems , 2004 .

[40]  Hikmet Kerem Cigizoglu,et al.  Application of Generalized Regression Neural Networks to Intermittent Flow Forecasting and Estimation , 2005 .

[41]  F. Lepori,et al.  DOES RESTORATION OF STRUCTURAL HETEROGENEITY IN STREAMS ENHANCE FISH AND MACROINVERTEBRATE DIVERSITY , 2005 .

[42]  S. Sulliván,et al.  Relating stream physical habitat condition and concordance of biotic productivity across multiple taxa , 2008 .

[43]  Kyle E. Juracek,et al.  LIMITATIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF STREAM CLASSIFICATION 1 , 2003 .

[44]  Mark Patrick Taylor,et al.  A geomorphological framework for river characterization and habitat assessment , 2001 .

[45]  Ian Maddock,et al.  The Importance of Physical Habitat Assessment for Evaluating River Health , 1999 .

[46]  Keith C. Pelletier,et al.  Stream classification using hierarchical artificial neural networks: A fluvial hazard management tool , 2009 .

[47]  W. Hession,et al.  Understanding Stream Geomorphic State in Relation to Ecological Integrity: Evidence Using Habitat Assessments and Macroinvertebrates , 2004, Environmental management.

[48]  C. C. Watson,et al.  Incised Channels: Morphology, Dynamics, and Control , 1984 .

[49]  M. Firat,et al.  Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Techniques for river flow forecasting , 2008 .

[50]  Ozgur Kisi,et al.  Modelling daily suspended sediment of rivers in Turkey using several data-driven techniques / Modélisation de la charge journalière en matières en suspension dans des rivières turques à l'aide de plusieurs techniques empiriques , 2008 .

[51]  Donna M. Rizzo,et al.  Advances in ungauged streamflow prediction using artificial neural networks , 2010 .

[52]  K. Fryirs,et al.  Geomorphology and River Management: Applications of the River Styles Framework , 2005 .

[53]  R. S. Govindaraju,et al.  Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology , 2010 .

[54]  David S. Leigh,et al.  Stream macroinvertebrate response to catchment urbanisation (Georgia, U.S.A.) , 2003 .

[55]  M. A. Yurdusev,et al.  River flow estimation from upstream flow records by artificial intelligence methods. , 2009 .

[56]  Panayiotis Diplas,et al.  Using two-dimensional hydrodynamic models at scales of ecological importance , 2000 .

[57]  D. Rizzo,et al.  Spatial distribution and geomorphic condition of fish habitat in streams: an analysis using hydraulic modelling and geostatistics , 2008 .

[58]  S. Schumm The Fluvial System , 1977 .