Participatory or deliberative democracy? Exploring the mediation effects of perceived online deliberation and online interactive activities on social outcomes

Political news had strong effects on social outcomes both directly and indirectly.Entertainment news indirectly influenced political participation via news blogging.Perception of deliberation moderated an effect of political news on participation.News blogging mediated the relation between two types of news and participation. Using the structural equation modeling method (N=811), this study explores the structural relationships among online news consumption, political participation and social trust, with a focus on the mediating effects of online users' deliberative perceptions and news-related online interactive activities. The analysis confirms that users' perceptions of online deliberation exert a significant mediating effect on users' levels of news consumption, political participation, and social trust. Users' interactive civic messaging behaviors, on the other hand, solely enhance participatory intentions. The findings also show that the consumption of political news and the consumption of entertainment news have different effects on users' perceptions of online deliberation, social trust, and political participation. Specifically, while political news has a direct and relatively strong influence on participation, entertainment news has a limited and indirect effect on participation. Online interactive activities are negatively associated with users' perceived competency for online deliberation. Further implications of the study are also discussed.

[1]  Andrew F. Hayes,et al.  Contemporary approaches to assessing mediation in communication research. , 2008 .

[2]  An Nguyen.  The current status and potential development of online news consumption: A structural approach , 2003, First Monday.

[3]  Dmitri Williams,et al.  On and Off the 'Net: Scales for Social Capital in an Online Era , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[4]  J. Habermas.  Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research , 2006 .

[5]  C. Pateman.  Participation and democratic theory , 1970 .

[6]  L. Gross,et al.  The demonstration of power: violence profile no. 10. , 1979, The Journal of communication.

[7]  A. Hayes.  Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millennium , 2009 .

[8]  Pamela Paxton.  Social Capital and Democracy: An Interdependent Relationship , 2002, American Sociological Review.

[9]  Y. Tsfati,et al.  Exposure to News, Political Comedy, and Entertainment Talk Shows: Concern About Security and Political Mistrust , 2009 .

[10]  P. Brewer,et al.  Political Comedy Shows and Public Participation in Politics , 2008 .

[11]  Michael A. Xenos,et al.  Direct and Differential Effects of the Internet on Political and Civic Engagement , 2007 .

[12]  Bruce Bimber.  Information and Political Engagement in America: The Search for Effects of Information Technology at the Individual Level , 2001 .

[13]  P. Norris.  Tuned Out Voters , 2002 .

[14]  J. P. Eveland.  The Effect of Political Discussion in Producing Informed Citizens: The Roles of Information, Motivation, and Elaboration , 2004 .

[15]  R. Putnam.  Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital , 1995, The City Reader.

[16]  Lincoln Dahlberg,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication and The Public Sphere: A Critical Analysis , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[17]  Norman H. Nie,et al.  Education and democratic citizenship in America , 1996 .

[18]  J. Eyles,et al.  Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. , 2003, Social science & medicine.

[19]  J. Habermas,et al.  The structural transformation of the public sphere : an inquiryinto a category of bourgeois society , 1991 .

[20]  R. Polat.  The Internet and Political Participation , 2005 .

[21]  Thomas J. Johnson,et al.  From Here to Obscurity? Media Substitution Theory and Traditional Media in an On-line World , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[22]  Dhavan V. Shah.  Civic Engagement, Interpersonal Trust, and Television Use: An Individual-Level Assessment of Social Capital , 1998 .

[23]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Internet paradox. A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? , 1998, The American psychologist.

[24]  Diana C. Mutz,et al.  Online Groups and Political Discourse: Do Online Discussion Spaces Facilitate Exposure to Political Disagreement? , 2009 .

[25]  Claes H. de Vreese,et al.  News, Political Knowledge and Participation: The Differential Effects of News Media Exposure on Political Knowledge and Participation , 2006 .

[26]  J. Cappella,et al.  Does Disagreement Contribute to More Deliberative Opinion? , 2002 .

[27]  C. Sunstein.  Republic.com , 2001 .

[28]  James D. Fearon,et al.  Deliberative Democracy: Deliberation as Discussion , 1998 .

[29]  P. Norris.  Tuned Out Voters? Media Impact on Campaign Learning , 2002 .

[30]  R. Putnam.  Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital , 1995 .

[31]  Arthur Lupia,et al.  Views from Inside the Net: How Websites Affect Young Adults' Political Interest , 2005, The Journal of Politics.

[32]  Hoon Lee,et al.  Talking Politics and Engaging Politics: , 2005, Commun. Res..

[33]  Louis Leung,et al.  Lifestyles, reliance on traditional news media and online news adoption , 2005, New Media Soc..

[34]  Claes H. de Vreese,et al.  Comparing Young Voters' Political Engagement in the United States and Europe , 2007 .

[35]  Paul S. Martin.  The Mass Media as Sentinel: Why Bad News About Issues is Good News for Participation , 2008 .

[36]  H. Sachs,et al.  Computer networks and the formation of public opinion: an ethnographic study , 1995 .

[37]  J. Sullivan,et al.  The psychological underpinnings of democracy: A selective review of research on political tolerance, interpersonal trust, and social capital. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[38]  William Wresch,et al.  Democracy in the Digital Age: Challenges to Political Life in Cyberspace , 2001, Inf. Soc..

[39]  Tim Markham,et al.  The contribution of media consumption to civic participation. , 2008, The British journal of sociology.

[40]  L. Gross,et al.  The “Mainstreaming” of America: Violence Profile No. 11 , 1980 .

[41]  John Gastil,et al.  A Conceptual Definition and Theoretical Model of Public Deliberation in Small Face—to—Face Groups , 2002 .

[42]  John Keane.  Structural Transformations of the Public Sphere , 2020, The Information Society Reader.

[43]  Seong-Jae Min,et al.  Online vs. Face-to-Face Deliberation: Effects on Civic Engagement , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[44]  J. Habermas.  Theory of Communicative Action , 1981 .

[45]  Zizi Papacharissi.  The virtual sphere , 2002, New Media Soc..

[46]  Young Mie Kim,et al.  Just Laugh! You Don’t Need to Remember: The Effects of Entertainment Media on Political Information Acquisition and Information Processing in Political Judgment , 2008 .

[47]  R. Putnam,et al.  Introduction: What's Troubling the Trilateral Democracies? , 2000 .

[48]  Pamela Paxton.  Is Social Capital Declining in the United States? A Multiple Indicator Assessment1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[49]  Alain Degenne.  Social capital: a theory of social structure and action , 2004 .

[50]  Seoyeon Lee,et al.  Does Online News Reading and Sharing Shape Perceptions of the Internet as a Place for Public Deliberations? , 2013 .

[51]  John L. Sullivan,et al.  Political Tolerance and American Democracy , 1982 .

[52]  Lori M. Weber,et al.  Who Participates and Why? , 2003 .

[53]  Carolyn A. Lin,et al.  Online news as a functional substitute for offline news , 2004 .

[54]  Eun-mee Kim,et al.  News Perceptions and Uses among Online-News Users , 2008 .

[55]  Peter Dahlgren.  The Internet, Public Spheres, and Political Communication: Dispersion and Deliberation , 2005 .

[56]  D. Weaver,et al.  Voter Learning and Interest in the 2000 Presidential Election: Did the Media Matter? , 2001 .

[57]  Peter Dahlgren,et al.  Young Citizens and New Media: Learning for Democratic Participation , 2007 .

[58]  M. Baum.  Soft News and Political Knowledge: Evidence of Absence or Absence of Evidence? , 2003 .

[59]  Ellen Quintelier,et al.  Social Science Computer Review Volume Xx Number X Month Xxxx Xx-xx the Effect of Internet Use on Political Participation an Analysis of Survey Results for 16-year-olds in Belgium , 2022 .

[60]  Brian S. Krueger.  Assessing the Potential of Internet Political Participation in the United States , 2002 .

[61]  William P. Eveland,et al.  Is It Talking, Thinking, or Both? A Lagged Dependent Variable Model of Discussion Effects on Political Knowledge , 2006 .

[62]  Bruce Bimber.  The Internet and Citizen Communication With Government: Does the Medium Matter? , 1999 .

[63]  Zizi Papacharissi,et al.  Democracy online: civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups , 2004, New Media Soc..

[64]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  Campaign Ads, Online Messaging, and Participation: Extending the Communication Mediation Model , 2007, Journal of Communication.

[65]  Kerk F. Kee,et al.  Is There Social Capital in a Social Network Site?: Facebook Use and College Students’ Life Satisfaction, Trust, and Participation 1 , 2009 .

[66]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  Communication, Context, and Community , 2001, Commun. Res..

[67]  Gerard Delanty.  The Foundations of Social Theory , 2009 .

[68]  K. Kenski,et al.  Connections Between Internet Use and Political Efficacy, Knowledge, and Participation , 2006 .

[69]  Thomas J. Johnson,et al.  Communication Communities or "CyberGhettos?": A Path Analysis Model Examining Factors that Explain Selective Exposure to Blogs , 2009, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[70]  J. Dryzek.  Deliberative Democracy And Beyond , 2000 .

[71]  Seoyeon Lee,et al.  Why read online news? the structural relationships among motivations, behaviors, and consumption in South Korea , 2013 .

[72]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Community, Communication, and Participation: The Role of Mass Media and Interpersonal Discussion in Local Political Participation , 1999 .

[73]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Being a Citizen Online , 2002 .

[74]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[75]  P. Norris.  Does Television Erode Social Capital? A Reply to Putnam , 1996, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[76]  R. Kies,et al.  Online Forums and Deliberative Democracy , 2005 .

[77]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  "Connecting" and "Disconnecting" With Civic Life: Patterns of Internet Use and the Production of Social Capital , 2001 .

[78]  Dennis F. Thompson,et al.  Why Deliberative Democracy is Different , 2000, Social Philosophy and Policy.

[79]  YouKyung Han,et al.  Participatory or deliberative democracy? Exploring the mediation effects of perceived online deliberation and online interactive activities on social outcomes , 2015 .

[80]  Diana C. Mutz.  Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy , 2006 .

[81]  Weiwu Zhang,et al.  The Effects of Mass Media Use and Social Capital on Civic and Political Participation , 2006 .

[82]  Lindsay H. Hoffman,et al.  The Effect of Television Viewing on Adolescents' Civic Participation: Political Efficacy as a Mediating Mechanism , 2009 .

[83]  Online Deliberative Discourse and Conflic t Resolution , 2010 .