The effects of pushback delays on airport ground movement

With the constant increase in air traffic, airports are facing capacity problems. Optimisation methods for specific airport processes are starting to be increasingly utilised by many large airports. However, many processes do happen in parallel, and maximising the potential benefits will require a more complex optimisation model, which can consider multiple processes simultaneously and take into account the detailed complexities of the processes where necessary, rather than using more abstract models. This paper focuses on one of these complexities, which is usually ignored in ground movement planning; showing the importance of the pushback process in the routing process. It investigates whether taking the pushback process into consideration can result in the prediction of delays that would otherwise pass unnoticed. Having an accurate model for the pushback process is important for this and identifying all of the delays that may occur can lead to more accurate and realistic models that can then be used in the decision making process for ground movement operations. After testing two different routing methods with a more detailed pushback process, we found that many of the delays are not predicted if the pushback process is not explicitly modelled. Having a more precise model, with accurate movements of aircraft is very important for any integrated model and will allow ground movement models to be of use in more reliable integrated decision making systems at airports. Minimising these delays can help airports increase their capacity and become more environmentally friendly.

[1]  Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.  Optimizing Pushback Decisions to Valuate Airport Surface Surveillance Information , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[2]  P. C. Roling,et al.  Optimal airport surface traffic planning using mixed-integer linear programming , 2008 .

[3]  Edmund K. Burke,et al.  Aircraft taxi time prediction: Comparisons and insights , 2014, Appl. Soft Comput..

[4]  Ciro D'Apice,et al.  Optimal scheduling for aircraft departures , 2014, J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput..

[5]  Chris N. Potts,et al.  Airport runway scheduling , 2013, Ann. Oper. Res..

[6]  Edmund K. Burke,et al.  On-line decision support for take-off runway scheduling with uncertain taxi times at London Heathrow airport , 2008, J. Sched..

[7]  Carlo Mannino,et al.  Integrated surface and departure management at airports by optimization , 2013, 2013 5th International Conference on Modeling, Simulation and Applied Optimization (ICMSAO).

[8]  Edmund K. Burke,et al.  A combined statistical approach and ground movement model for improving taxi time estimations at airports , 2013, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[9]  Edmund K. Burke,et al.  The Airport Ground Movement Problem: Past and Current Research and Future Directions , 2010 .

[10]  Yury Nikulin,et al.  Flight gate scheduling: State-of-the-art and recent developments , 2007 .

[11]  Yu Cheng Solving push-out conflicts in apron taxiways of airports by a network-based simulation , 1998 .

[12]  Edmund K. Burke,et al.  A more realistic approach for airport ground movement optimisation with stand holding , 2013, Journal of Scheduling.

[13]  Edmund K. Burke,et al.  Addressing the Pushback Time Allocation Problem at Heathrow Airport , 2013, Transp. Sci..

[14]  Tomas Eric Nordlander,et al.  Pushback delays on the routing and scheduling problem of aircraft , 2015 .

[15]  Umar S. Suryahatmaja,et al.  The Airport Gate Assignment Problem: A Survey , 2014, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[16]  Ekkehard Köhler,et al.  Dynamic Routing of Automated Guided Vehicles in Real-time , 2008 .

[17]  M. Ball,et al.  Estimating Flight Departure Delay Distributions—A Statistical Approach With Long-Term Trend and Short-Term Pattern , 2008 .

[18]  Edmund K. Burke,et al.  Hybrid Metaheuristics to Aid Runway Scheduling at London Heathrow Airport , 2007, Transp. Sci..