Model-Based Threat Assessment for Avoiding Arbitrary Vehicle Collisions

This paper presents a model-based algorithm that estimates how the driver of a vehicle can either steer, brake, or accelerate to avoid colliding with an arbitrary object. In this algorithm, the motion of the vehicle is described by a linear bicycle model, and the perimeter of the vehicle is represented by a rectangle. The estimated perimeter of the object is described by a polygon that is allowed to change size, shape, position, and orientation at sampled time instances. Potential evasive maneuvers are modeled, parameterized, and approximated such that an analytical expression can be derived to estimate the set of maneuvers that the driver can use to avoid a collision. This set of maneuvers is then assessed to determine if the driver needs immediate assistance to avoid or mitigate an accident. The proposed threat-assessment algorithm is evaluated using authentic data from both real traffic conditions and collision situations on a test track and by using simulations with a detailed vehicle model. The evaluations show that the algorithm outperforms conventional threat-assessment algorithms at rear-end collisions in terms of the timing of autonomous brake activation. This is crucial for increasing the performance of collision-avoidance systems and for decreasing the risk of unnecessary braking. Moreover, the algorithm is computationally efficient and can be used to assist the driver in avoiding or mitigating collisions with all types of road users in all kinds of traffic scenarios.

[1]  H Godthelp,et al.  Vehicle Control During Curve Driving , 1986, Human factors.

[2]  T D Gillespie,et al.  Fundamentals of Vehicle Dynamics , 1992 .

[3]  Ronald R Knipling,et al.  REAR-END CRASHES: PROBLEM SIZE ASSESSMENT AND STATISTICAL DESCRIPTION. TECHNICAL REPORT , 1993 .

[4]  Ronald R Knipling,et al.  Vehicle-based drowsy driver detection : current status and future prospects , 1994 .

[5]  Peter J Seiler,et al.  Development of a collision avoidance system , 1998 .

[6]  J J Breuer,et al.  ANALYSIS OF DRIVER-VEHICLE-INTERACTIONS IN AN EVASIVE MANOEUVRE - RESULTS OF "MOOSE TEST" STUDIES , 1998 .

[7]  Parole,et al.  Annual statistical report, fiscal year 2012 , 2018 .

[8]  Yoji Seto,et al.  Research on a Braking System for Reducing Collision Speed , 2003 .

[9]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  An overview of the 100-car naturalistic study and findings , 2005 .

[10]  T. Kanade,et al.  Monte Carlo road safety reasoning , 2005, IEEE Proceedings. Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 2005..

[11]  Huei Peng,et al.  Evaluation of automotive forward collision warning and collision avoidance algorithms , 2005 .

[12]  Jonas Jansson,et al.  Collision Avoidance Theory : with Application to Automotive Collision Mitigation , 2005 .

[13]  Kristian Kroschel,et al.  A Multilevel Collision Mitigation Approach—Its Situation Assessment, Decision Making, and Performance Tradeoffs , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[14]  J. Hillenbrand,et al.  A Study on the Performance of Uncooperative Collision Mitigation Systems at Intersection-like Traffic Situations , 2006, 2006 IEEE Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent Systems.

[15]  Wolfgang Birk,et al.  Collision warning with auto brake , 2006 .

[16]  Anders Kullgren,et al.  The Effectiveness of Electronic Stability Control (ESC) in Reducing Real Life Crashes and Injuries , 2006, Traffic injury prevention.

[17]  Yukinori Yamada,et al.  Development of a New Pre-crash Safety System , 2006 .

[18]  J. Gunnarsson,et al.  Tracking vehicles using radar detections , 2007, 2007 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium.

[19]  Fredrik Gustafsson,et al.  Toward Autonomous Collision Avoidance by Steering , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[20]  Lars Petersson,et al.  Statistical Threat Assessment for General Road Scenes Using Monte Carlo Sampling , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[21]  E. Coelingh,et al.  A situation and threat assessment algorithm for a rear-end collision avoidance system , 2008, 2008 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium.

[22]  S. Kolski,et al.  Detection, prediction, and avoidance of dynamic obstacles in urban environments , 2008, 2008 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium.

[23]  Lotta Jakobsson,et al.  City Safety - A System Addressing Rear-End Collisions at Low Speeds , 2009 .

[24]  J. Kim Identification of lateral tyre force dynamics using an extended Kalman filter from experimental road test data , 2009 .

[25]  Klaus C. J. Dietmayer,et al.  Situation Assessment of an Autonomous Emergency Brake for Arbitrary Vehicle-to-Vehicle Collision Scenarios , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[26]  Ho Gi Jung,et al.  Scenario-driven search for pedestrians aimed at triggering non-reversible systems , 2009, 2009 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium.

[27]  Roland Schweiger,et al.  Camera and imaging radar feature level sensorfusion for night vision pedestrian recognition , 2009, 2009 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium.

[28]  Jonas Sjoberg,et al.  Threat assessment for avoiding collisions with turning vehicles , 2009, 2009 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium.