The Influence of Real-Time Identifiability and Evaluability Performance Feedback on Group Electronic Brainstorming Performance
暂无分享,去创建一个
Joseph S. Valacich | Christoph Schneider | Jay J. H. Jung | J. Valacich | C. Schneider | Jay J. H. Jung
[1] Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al. Computer Support for Group Versus Individual Decisions , 1982, IEEE Trans. Commun..
[2] S. Ashford. Feedback-Seeking in Individual Adaptation: A Resource Perspective , 1986 .
[3] Leonard M. Jessup,et al. The deindividuating effects of anonymity on automated group idea generation. , 1989 .
[4] D. Myers. Social psychology, 4th ed. , 1993 .
[5] Robert B. Zajonc,et al. The Effects of Feedback and Probability of Group Success on Individual and Group Performance , 1962 .
[6] M. Turner. GROUPS AT WORK: THEORY AND RESEARCH , 2002 .
[7] Robert Albanese,et al. Rational Behavior in Groups: The Free-Riding Tendency , 1985 .
[8] Lyman W. Porter,et al. Managerial attitudes and performance , 1968 .
[9] S. Karau,et al. Social loafing and social compensation: the effects of expectations of co-worker performance. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[10] J. Valacich,et al. Idea Generation in Computer-Based Groups: A New Ending to an Old Story , 1994 .
[11] Kipling D. Williams,et al. PROCESSES Social Loafing: A Meta-Analytic Review and Theoretical Integration , 2022 .
[12] Joseph S. Valacich,et al. The effects of individual cognitive ability and idea stimulation on idea-generation performance , 2006 .
[13] R. B. Payne,et al. Effect of psychological feedback upon work decrement. , 1955, Journal of experimental psychology.
[14] Teresa M. Amabile,et al. A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations , 1988 .
[15] Paul B. Paulus,et al. Social influence processes in computer brainstorming , 1996 .
[16] Bernard A. Nijstad,et al. Persistence of Brainstorming Groups: How Do People Know When to Stop? , 1999 .
[17] A. L. Beaman,et al. Effects of deindividuation variables on stealing among Halloween trick-or-treaters. , 1976 .
[18] R. Gallupe,et al. Some Liberating Effects of Anonymous Electronic Brainstorming , 1998 .
[19] M. Zuckerman,et al. Determinants of information-seeking behavior , 1979 .
[20] J. Cacioppo,et al. The need for cognition. , 1982 .
[21] Teresa M. Amabile,et al. Creativity In Context: Update To The Social Psychology Of Creativity , 1996 .
[22] E. Weldon,et al. Felt dispensability in groups of coactors: The effects of shared responsibility and explicit anonymity on cognitive effort , 1988 .
[23] S. Harkins,et al. Social Loafing and Self-Evaluation With a Social Standard , 2004 .
[24] D. Eden,et al. Effects of crew composition on crew performance: Does the whole equal the sum of its parts? , 1985 .
[25] Dent,et al. Cognitive Load and the Equality Heuristic: A Two-Stage Model of Resource Overconsumption in Small Groups. , 2000, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.
[26] L. Festinger. A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .
[27] Alan R. Dennis,et al. Process Structuring in Electronic Brainstorming , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..
[28] N. Kerr. Motivation losses in small groups: a social dilemma analysis , 1983 .
[29] A. Ingham,et al. The Ringelmann effect: Studies of group size and group performance , 1974 .
[30] J. Hackman,et al. Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration , 1975 .
[31] William J. Kettinger,et al. Pragmatic Perspectives on the Measurement of Information Systems Service Quality , 1997, MIS Q..
[32] Susan G. Straus,et al. Does the medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. , 1994, The Journal of applied psychology.
[33] Vincent R. Brown,et al. Enhancing ideational creativity in groups: Lessons from research on brainstorming. , 2003 .
[34] Vincent R. Brown,et al. Modeling Cognitive Interactions During Group Brainstorming , 1998 .
[35] Marie Christine Roy,et al. Electronic Group Brainstorming , 1996 .
[36] Monica J. Garfield,et al. Modifying Paradigms: Individual Differences, Creativity Techniques and Exposure to Ideas in Group Idea Generation , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..
[37] Monica J. Garfield,et al. Research Report: The Effectiveness of Multiple Dialogues in Electronic Brainstorming , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..
[38] R. Merton. The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy , 1948 .
[39] B. Nijstad,et al. Group creativity : An introduction , 2003 .
[40] Alan R. Dennis,et al. Electronic brainstorming: Theory, research, and future directions. , 2003 .
[41] J. Shepperd. Productivity loss in performance groups: A motivation analysis. , 1993 .
[42] Esther E. Klein,et al. The role of computer support tools and gender composition in innovative information system idea generation by small groups. , 2000 .
[43] T. M. Amabile. The social psychology of creativity , 1984 .
[44] S. Harkins,et al. Effects of task difficulty and task uniqueness on social loafing. , 1982 .
[45] Kim S. Cameron,et al. Developing management skills. , 1998, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).
[46] Jay F. Nunamaker,et al. 1001 Unanswered Research Questions in GSS , 1997, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..
[47] L. L. Cummings,et al. FEEDBACK AS AN INDIVIDUAL RESOURCE: PERSONAL STRATEGIES OF CREATING INFORMATION , 1983 .
[48] L. Festinger,et al. Some consequences of de-individuation in a group , 1952 .
[49] Mary T. Dzindolet,et al. Perception of Performance in Group Brainstorming: The Illusion of Group Productivity , 1993 .
[50] S. Kiesler,et al. Group processes in computer-mediated communication☆ , 1986 .
[51] S. Karau,et al. Understanding individual motivation in groups: The collective effort model. , 2001 .
[52] Vincent R. Brown,et al. A Simple Dynamic Model of Social Factors in Group Brainstorming , 1996 .
[53] L. Festinger,et al. Some consequences of deindividuation in a group. , 1952, Journal of abnormal psychology.
[54] Richard A. Guzzo,et al. Teams in organizations: recent research on performance and effectiveness. , 1996, Annual review of psychology.
[55] Michael Diehl,et al. The Illusion of Group Effectivity , 1992 .
[56] Jay F. Nunamaker,et al. Invoking Social Comparison to Improve Electronic Brainstorming: Beyond Anonymity , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..
[57] S. Harkins,et al. The Role of Evaluation in Eliminating Social Loafing , 1985 .
[58] Joseph S. Valacich,et al. Facilitation, GSS, and Training as Sources of Process Restrictiveness and Guidance for Structured Group Decision Making: An Empirical Assessment , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..
[59] D. van Knippenberg,et al. How a group goal may reduce social matching in group performance: shifts in standards for determining a fair contribution of effort. , 2002, The Journal of social psychology.
[60] Teresa M. Amabile,et al. How to kill creativity. , 1998, Harvard business review.
[61] A. Dennis,et al. When a Group Is Not a Group , 1993 .
[62] Alain Pinsonneault,et al. Anonymity in Group Support Systems Research: A New Conceptualization, Measure, and Contingency Framework , 1997, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..
[63] M. Diehl,et al. Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. , 1987 .
[64] Lyman W. Porter,et al. Managerial Attitudes and Performance. , 1969 .
[65] Patrick R. Laughlin,et al. Individual versus tetradic performance on a complementary task as a function of initial ability level , 1972 .
[66] P. Zimbardo. The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. , 1969 .
[67] Gerardine DeSanctis,et al. A foundation for the study of group decision support systems , 1987 .
[68] Daniel A. Levinthal,et al. ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .
[69] Dennis J. Devine,et al. Do Smarter Teams Do Better , 2001 .
[70] Lawrence J. Sanna,et al. Group Performance And Interaction , 1998 .
[71] J. Valacich,et al. Group Size and Anonymity Effects on Computer-Mediated Idea Generation , 1992 .
[72] S. Kiesler,et al. Group decision making and communication technology , 1992 .
[73] Alain Pinsonneault,et al. Electronic Brainstorming: The Illusion of Productivity , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..
[74] David A. Nadler,et al. The effects of feedback on task group behavior: A review of the experimental research , 1979 .
[75] P. R. Laughlin,et al. Group and individual performance on a complementary task as a function of initial ability level , 1966 .
[76] V. Vroom. Work and motivation , 1964 .
[77] Leonard M. Jessup,et al. The Effects of Anonymity on GDSS Group Process with an Idea-Generating Task , 1990, MIS Q..
[78] Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al. Experiments in group decision making, 3: disinhibition, deindividuation, and group process in pen name and real name computer conferences , 1989, Decis. Support Syst..
[79] Joey F. George,et al. Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Group Support Systems Research , 1997 .
[80] Bruce J. Avolio,et al. Effects of Source and Participant Anonymity and Difference in Initial Opinions in an EMS Context , 1998 .
[81] Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al. Structuring computer-mediated communication systems to avoid information overload , 1985, CACM.
[82] J. Valacich,et al. Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups , 1990 .
[83] Richard T. Herschel,et al. Exploring numerical proportions in a unique context: The group support systems meeting environment , 1994 .