Goals, Rhetoric, and (In)Equity: The Rationales Behind Decentralizing a Large, Diverse School District

School district decentralization typically shifts authority and resources from central office administrators at the district level to leaders at the school level. Although decentralization reforms have been prevalent in urban educational contexts for decades, they often yield poor results for low-income, minoritized communities. In this article, we examine stakeholder rationales behind decentralizing a large, diverse countywide district and the extent to which equity was part of these rationales. The findings suggest that although stakeholders aim to improve student achievement, financial and administrative efficiency, and family/community engagement through decentralization, many failed to consider how school-level disparities might result in sustaining or worsening inequities.

[1]  Camika Royal,et al.  School Reform and School Choice , 2013, Handbook of Urban Education.

[2]  F. A. Pearman.  Gentrification, Geography, and the Declining Enrollment of Neighborhood Schools , 2020, Urban Education.

[3]  Felecia Briscoe,et al.  The Color of Neoliberal Reform: A Critical Race Policy Analysis of School District Takeovers in Michigan , 2018, Urban Education.

[4]  Sarah Diem,et al.  The Disintegration of Memphis-Shelby County, Tennessee: School District Secession and Local Control in the 21st Century , 2018 .

[5]  Sarah Diem,et al.  Reorganizing a countywide school district: A critical analysis of politics and policy development toward decentralization , 2018 .

[6]  Erica Frankenberg,et al.  Segregation by District Boundary Line: The Fragmentation of Memphis Area Schools , 2017 .

[7]  Helen F. Ladd,et al.  Self-governing schools, parental choice, and the need to protect the public interest , 2017 .

[8]  Carrie Sampson.  So It “Became White Activists Fighting for Integration?” Community Organizations, Intersectional Identities, and Education Reform , 2017 .

[9]  Terrance L. Green.  Community-Based Equity Audits , 2017 .

[10]  S. Horsford.  Race and Education in the Mountain West: Charting New Territory in America’s Racial Frontier , 2016 .

[11]  W. Au,et al.  Introduction : Neoliberalism, Social Networks, and the New Governance of Education , 2015 .

[12]  Stuart Hall,et al.  Fast Facts , 2014 .

[13]  L. Soares,et al.  O Reconhecimento das especificidades da Educação de Jovens e Adultos: constituição e organização de propostas de EJA , 2014 .

[14]  David E. DeMatthews,et al.  Historical Trends in Educational Decentralization in the United States and Developing Countries: A Periodization and Comparison in the Post-WWII Context , 2014 .

[15]  H. Milner,et al.  Handbook of Urban Education , 2014 .

[16]  S. Horsford,et al.  School Resegregation in the Mississippi of the West: Community Counternarratives on the Return to Neighborhood Schools in Las Vegas, 1968–1994 , 2013 .

[17]  Hyun Jung Kang,et al.  ELL Policy and Mathematics Professional Development Colliding: Placing Teacher Experimentation within a Sociopolitical Context , 2013, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[18]  L. Darling-Hammond.  Inequality and School ResourcesWhat It Will Take to Close the Opportunity Gap , 2013 .

[19]  Kevin G. Welner,et al.  Closing the opportunity gap : what America must do to give every child an even chance , 2013 .

[20]  A. Johnson.  “Turnaround” as Shock Therapy , 2013 .

[21]  C. Arthur,et al.  The New Political Economy of Urban Education: Neoliberalism, Race, and the Right to the City. Critical Social Thought. , 2011 .

[22]  Kenneth J. Saltman.  Urban School Decentralization and the Growth of "Portfolio Districts" , 2010 .

[23]  B. M. Superfine,et al.  Court-Driven Reform and Equal Educational Opportunity: Centralization, Decentralization, and the Shifting Judicial Role , 2010 .

[24]  J. Blase,et al.  The micropolitics of school district decentralization , 2009 .

[25]  J. Flashman,et al.  Expanding Student Opportunities: Prime 6 Program Review, Clark County School District, Las Vegas, Nevada , 2009 .

[26]  B. Fuller.  Policy and Place—Learning from Decentralized Reforms , 2009 .

[27]  Johnny Saldaña,et al.  The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers , 2009 .

[28]  H. Meyer.  Saying What We Mean, and Meaning What We Say—Unpacking the Contingencies of Decentralization , 2009, American Journal of Education.

[29]  P. Gertler,et al.  School Decentralization: Helping the Good Get Better, but Leaving the Poor Behind , 2008 .

[30]  Jean Anyon.  Radical Possibilities: Public Policy, Urban Education, and A New Social Movement , 2005 .

[31]  J. Hansen,et al.  Decentralized Decisionmaking for Schools: New Promise for an Old Idea?. , 2005 .

[32]  B. Malen.  Tightening the Grip? The Impact of State Activism on Local School Systems , 2003 .

[33]  Clarence N. Stone.  Building civic capacity : the politics of reforming urban schools , 2001 .

[34]  H. Dekkers,et al.  Decentralisation and Combating Educational Exclusion , 2001 .

[35]  M. Engle.  Book Review: Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (2nd Ed.) , 1999 .

[36]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Qualitative research and case study applications in education , 1998 .

[37]  Ray Budde.  The Evolution of the Charter Concept. , 1996 .

[38]  Bruce Bimber.  The Decentralization Mirage: Comparing Decisionmaking Arrangements in Four High Schools , 1995 .

[39]  R. Stake.  The art of case study research , 1995 .

[40]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[41]  Priscilla Wohlstetter,et al.  Rethinking School-Based Management Policy and Research , 1992 .

[42]  Priscilla Wohlstetter,et al.  The Link between School Decentralization and School Politics , 1991 .

[43]  Rodney T. Ogawa,et al.  Professional-Patron Influence on Site-Based Governance Councils: A Confounding Case Study , 1988 .