Size effect of elemental selenium nanoparticles (Nano-Se) at supranutritional levels on selenium accumulation and glutathione S-transferase activity.

It has been shown that 36 nm Nano-Se has lower toxicity than selenite or selenomethionine, but these forms of selenium (Se) all possess similar ability to increase selenoenzyme levels. The size of nanoparticles plays an important role in their biological activity: as expected, 5-200 nm Nano-Se can directly scavenge free radicals in vitro in a size-dependent fashion. However, in Se-deficient cells and Se-deficient mice, the size effect of Nano-Se on increasing selenoenzymes and liver Se disappears unexpectedly. We hypothesize that under conditions of Se deficiency, the avidity of Se uptake mechanisms may be increased to maintain the biosynthesis of selenoenzymes, which are fundamental for redox homeostasis. This increased avidity may override the potential advantage of small size Nano-Se seen under Se-replete conditions, thereby eliminating the size effect. Once selenoenzymes have been saturated, Se uptake mechanisms may downregulate; accordingly, the size effect of Nano-Se can then reappear. To test this hypothesis, Se-deficient mice were administered either 36 or 90 nm Nano-Se at supranutritional doses, in both a short-term model and a single-dose model. Under these conditions, Nano-Se showed a size effect on Se accumulation and glutathione S-transferase (GST) activity. A size effect of Nano-Se was found in 15 out of 18 total comparisons between sizes at the same dose and time in the two models. Furthermore, the magnitude of the size effect was more prominent on Se accumulation than on GST activity. GST is strictly regulated by transcriptional and translational mechanisms, so its increase in activity normally does not exceed 3-fold. In contrast, the homeostasis of Se accumulation is not as tightly controlled. In the present experiments, GST activity had reached or was approaching saturation, but liver Se was far below saturation. Therefore, our results strongly suggest that the saturation profile of the tested biomarker has an impact on the size effect of Nano-Se. Since both GST and small molecular weight selenocompounds accumulated in vivo are important intermediates for chemoprevention by Se, our results also suggest that Nano-Se should be most effective as a chemopreventive agent at smaller particle size.

[1]  Reynée W. Sampson,et al.  Elemental Selenium Generated by the Photobleaching of Seleno-Merocyanine Photosensitizers Forms Conjugates with Serum Macro-Molecules That are Toxic to Tumor Cells , 2005, Phosphorus Sulfur and Silicon and the Related Elements.

[2]  J. Spallholz On the nature of selenium toxicity and carcinostatic activity. , 1994, Free radical biology & medicine.

[3]  P. Whanger Selenium and its relationship to cancer: an update† , 2004, British Journal of Nutrition.

[4]  R. Sunde,et al.  Selenium regulation of thioredoxin reductase activity and mRNA levels in rat liver. , 2001, The Journal of nutritional biochemistry.

[5]  J. B. Taylor,et al.  Effect of the chemical form of supranutritional selenium on selenium load and selenoprotein activities in virgin, pregnant, and lactating rats. , 2005, Journal of animal science.

[6]  M. Saito,et al.  Early embryonic lethality caused by targeted disruption of the mouse PHGPx gene. , 2003, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[7]  Y. Bao,et al.  Biological effects of a nano red elemental selenium , 2001, BioFactors.

[8]  Nathan V. Matusheski,et al.  Comparison of the bioactivity of two glucoraphanin hydrolysis products found in broccoli, sulforaphane and sulforaphane nitrile. , 2001, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[9]  K. Parkin,et al.  Induction of Phase II Enzyme Activity by Various Selenium Compounds , 2006, Nutrition and cancer.

[10]  Andrew G. Glen,et al.  APPL , 2001 .

[11]  P. Crack,et al.  Glutathione peroxidase 1 and glutathione are required to protect mouse astrocytes from iron‐mediated hydrogen peroxide toxicity , 2006, Journal of neuroscience research.

[12]  Zi-rong Xu,et al.  In vitro and in vivo suppression of hepatocellular carcinoma growth by chitosan nanoparticles. , 2007, European journal of cancer.

[13]  S. Kashiwada,et al.  Distribution of Nanoparticles in the See-through Medaka (Oryzias latipes) , 2006, Environmental health perspectives.

[14]  G. Combs Current evidence and research needs to support a health claim for selenium and cancer prevention. , 2005, The Journal of nutrition.

[15]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[16]  Hanqing Yu,et al.  Elemental selenium at nano size possesses lower toxicity without compromising the fundamental effect on selenoenzymes: comparison with selenomethionine in mice. , 2007, Free radical biology & medicine.

[17]  H. Ganther,et al.  Selenium: Biochemical Role as a Component of Glutathione Peroxidase , 1973, Science.

[18]  R. Oremland,et al.  Microbial oxidation of elemental selenium in soil slurries and bacterial cultures , 1998 .

[19]  S. Novoselov,et al.  Specific Excision of the Selenocysteine tRNA[Ser]Sec (Trsp) Gene in Mouse Liver Demonstrates an Essential Role of Selenoproteins in Liver Function* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[20]  X. Jia,et al.  A subchronic toxicity study of elemental Nano-Se in Sprague-Dawley rats. , 2005, Life sciences.

[21]  Buffhirko VET , 2006 .

[22]  G. Oberdörster,et al.  Nanotoxicology: An Emerging Discipline Evolving from Studies of Ultrafine Particles , 2005, Environmental health perspectives.

[23]  M. Berry Insights into the hierarchy of selenium incorporation , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[24]  H. Mohan,et al.  Reactions of biological oxidants with selenourea: formation of redox active nanoselenium. , 2005, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[25]  H. Schneider,et al.  Dietary ortho phenols that induce glutathione S-transferase and increase the resistance of cells to hydrogen peroxide are potential cancer chemopreventives that act by two mechanisms: the alleviation of oxidative stress and the detoxification of mutagenic xenobiotics. , 2000, Cancer letters.

[26]  Kazuo T. Suzuki,et al.  Metabolism of 76Se-methylselenocysteine compared with that of 77Se-selenomethionine and 82Se-selenite. , 2006, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[27]  W B Jakoby,et al.  Glutathione S-transferases. The first enzymatic step in mercapturic acid formation. , 1974, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[28]  G. Pfeifer,et al.  Mutation accumulation in the intestine and colon of mice deficient in two intracellular glutathione peroxidases. , 2006, Cancer research.

[29]  T. Aboul-Fadl,et al.  Acute effects of novel selenazolidines on murine chemoprotective enzymes. , 2006, Chemico-biological interactions.

[30]  T. Aboul-Fadl,et al.  Murine hepatoma (Hepa1c1c7) cells: a responsive in vitro system for chemoprotective enzyme induction by organoselenium compounds. , 2007, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[31]  J. Hou,et al.  Free radical scavenging efficiency of Nano-Se in vitro. , 2003, Free radical biology & medicine.

[32]  C. Davis,et al.  Both selenoproteins and low molecular weight selenocompounds reduce colon cancer risk in mice with genetically impaired selenoprotein expression , 2006, The Journal of nutrition.

[33]  Lide Zhang,et al.  Comparison of short-term toxicity between Nano-Se and selenite in mice. , 2005, Life sciences.

[34]  T. Aboul-Fadl,et al.  Effect of selenium-containing compounds on hepatic chemoprotective enzymes in mice. , 2006, Toxicology.

[35]  Remo Guidieri Res , 1995, RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics.

[36]  F. El-Demerdash EFFECTS OF SELENIUM AND MERCURY ON THE ENZYMATIC ACTIVITIES AND LIPID PEROXIDATION IN BRAIN, LIVER, AND BLOOD OF RATS , 2001, Journal of environmental science and health. Part. B, Pesticides, food contaminants, and agricultural wastes.

[37]  Lide Zhang,et al.  Nano red elemental selenium has no size effect in the induction of seleno-enzymes in both cultured cells and mice. , 2004, Life sciences.

[38]  C. Xie,et al.  Size effects of realgar particles on apoptosis in a human umbilical vein endothelial cell line: ECV-304. , 2001, Pharmacological research.