Centre De Referència En Economia Analítica Barcelona Economics Working Paper Series Working Paper Nº 178 Who's Who in Networks. Wanted: the Key Player Who's Who in Networks. Wanted: the Key Player Barcelona Economics Wp Nº 178

Finite population noncooperative games with linear-quadratic utilities, where each player decides how much action she exerts, can be interpreted as a network game with local payoff complementarities, together with a globally uniform payoff substitutability component and an own-concavity effect. For these games, the Nash equilibrium action of each player is proportional to her Bonacich centrality in the network of local complementarities, thus establishing a bridge with the sociology literature on social networks. This Bonacich-Nash linkage implies that aggregate equilibrium increases with network size and density. We then analyze a policy that consists of targeting the key player, that is, the player who, once removed, leads to the optimal change in aggregate activity. We provide a geometric characterization of the key player identified with an intercentrality measure, which takes into account both a player's centrality and her contribution to the centrality of the others. Copyright The Econometric Society 2006.

[1]  G. Debreu,et al.  Nonnegative Square Matrices , 1953 .

[2]  Leo Katz,et al.  A new status index derived from sociometric analysis , 1953 .

[3]  George A. Akerlof A theory of social custom, of which unemployment may be one consequence , 1980 .

[4]  E. Mills,et al.  Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics , 1987 .

[5]  P. Bonacich Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[6]  John Scott What is social network analysis , 2010 .

[7]  D. Cvetkovic,et al.  The largest eigenvalue of a graph: A survey , 1990 .

[8]  L. Iannaccone Sacrifice and Stigma: Reducing Free-riding in Cults, Communes, and Other Collectives , 1992, Journal of Political Economy.

[9]  E. Lazear,et al.  Peer Pressure and Partnerships , 1992, Journal of Political Economy.

[10]  B. Bernheim,et al.  A Theory of Conformity , 1994, Journal of Political Economy.

[11]  George A. Akerlof Social Distance and Social Decisions , 1997 .

[12]  E. Berman,et al.  Sect, Subsidy and Sacrifice: An Economist's View of Ultra-Orthodox Jews , 1998 .

[13]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Error and attack tolerance of complex networks , 2000, Nature.

[14]  S. Goyal,et al.  R&D Networks , 2000 .

[15]  S. Borgatti The Key Player Problem , 2002 .

[16]  Alexandre Arenas,et al.  Optimal network topologies for local search with congestion , 2002, Physical review letters.

[17]  Edwin R. Hancock,et al.  Eigenspaces for Graphs , 2002, Int. J. Image Graph..

[18]  赤銅鉱型構造の局所熱膨張 Ag 2 Oの場合 , 2002 .

[19]  Sanjeev Goyal,et al.  Networks of collaboration in oligopoly , 2000, Games Econ. Behav..

[20]  M. Jackson A Survey of Models of Network Formation: Stability and Efficiency , 2003 .

[21]  M. Jackson,et al.  The Effects of Social Networks on Employment and Inequality , 2004 .

[22]  Béla Bollobás,et al.  Robustness and Vulnerability of Scale-Free Random Graphs , 2004, Internet Math..

[23]  Yves Zenou,et al.  Working Paper No . 601 , 2003 Social Networks and Crime Decisions : The Role of Social Structure in Facilitating Delinquent Behavior , 2003 .

[24]  Tamara D. Madensen,et al.  Neighborhood Effects , 2021, Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.

[25]  Yves Zenou,et al.  Who's Who in Crime Network. Wanted the Key Player , 2004 .

[26]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Dynamic Social Network Modeling and Analysis: Workshop Summary and Papers , 2004 .

[27]  Massimo Marchiori,et al.  Error and attacktolerance of complex network s , 2004 .

[28]  Mark E. J. Newman A measure of betweenness centrality based on random walks , 2005, Soc. Networks.

[29]  Matthew O. Jackson,et al.  The Economics of Social Networks , 2005 .

[30]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.