Interdependence and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Exploring the Mediating Effect of Group Cohesion in Multilevel Analysis

ABSTRACT The authors investigated the mechanism of group cohesion in the relationship between (a) task interdependence and goal interdependence and (b) individuals’ organizational citizenship behavior (OCB). The authors adopted a multilevel perspective to facilitate understanding of the complex relations among variables. They collected data from 53 supervisors and 270 employees from R&D departments in Taiwan. The authors found that group cohesion fully mediated the effects of task interdependence and goal interdependence on employees’ OCB. In addition, task interdependence had a greater effect on group cohesion than did goal interdependence. The authors discuss implications and suggestions for future research.

[1]  M. Deutsch.  A Theory of Co-operation and Competition , 1949 .

[2]  David A. Hofmann,et al.  A CROSS-LEVEL INVESTIGATION OF FACTORS INFLUENCING UNSAFE BEHAVIORS AND ACCIDENTS , 1996 .

[3]  K. Klein,et al.  Levels Issues in Theory Development, Data Collection, and Analysis , 1994 .

[4]  P. Christopher Earley,et al.  Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and , 1997 .

[5]  Walter D. Davis,et al.  Journal of Management High-performance Work Systems and Organizational Performance: the Mediating Role of Internal on Behalf Of: Southern Management Association , 2005 .

[6]  T. Thrall.  Work redesign. , 2003, Hospitals & health networks.

[7]  Gerben S. van der Vegt,et al.  PATTERNS OF INTERDEPENDENCE IN WORK TEAMS: A TWO‐LEVEL INVESTIGATION OF THE RELATIONS WITH JOB AND TEAM SATISFACTION , 2001 .

[8]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research , 1989 .

[9]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[10]  M. Pillutla,et al.  An Investigation of Traditionality as a Moderator of Reward Allocation , 2007 .

[11]  G. V. D. Vegt,et al.  Team Members’ Affective Responses to Patterns of Intragroup Interdependence and Job Complexity , 2000 .

[12]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Multilevel Theory, Research, a n d M e t h o d s i n Organizations Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions , 2022 .

[13]  Daniel G. Bachrach,et al.  Effects of task interdependence on the relationship between helping behavior and group performance. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[14]  R. Brislin.  The wording and translation of research instruments. , 1986 .

[15]  Stephanie L. Castro,et al.  Data analytic methods for the analysis of multilevel questions: A comparison of intraclass correlation coefficients, rwg(j), hierarchical linear modeling, within- and between-analysis, and random group resampling , 2002 .

[16]  J. Schriesheim.  The Social Context of Leader-Subordinate Relations: An Investigation of the Effects of Group Cohesiveness , 1980 .

[17]  J. F. Preble,et al.  Group Processes and Performance in A Complex Business Simulation , 1985 .

[18]  Gilad Chen,et al.  The role of different levels of leadership in predicting self- and collective efficacy: evidence for discontinuity. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[19]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications , 1988 .

[20]  Nathan Bennett,et al.  A Case for Procedural Justice Climate: Development and Test of a Multilevel Model. , 2000 .

[21]  R. Hackett,et al.  Leader-Member Exchange as a Mediator of the Relationship Between Transformational Leadership and Followers' Performance and Organizational Citizenship Behavior , 2005 .

[22]  Carrie R. Leana,et al.  Organizational Social Capital and Employment Practices , 1999 .

[23]  P. Bliese.  Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. , 2000 .

[24]  Jean M. Williams,et al.  Causal Relationships Among Cohesion, Satisfaction, and Performance in Women's Intercollegiate Field Hockey Teams , 1982 .

[25]  J. George,et al.  Feeling good-doing good: a conceptual analysis of the mood at work-organizational spontaneity relationship. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[26]  S. J. Motowidlo,et al.  Prosocial Organizational Behaviors , 1986 .

[27]  R. Bies,et al.  Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome , 1989 .

[28]  V. Vroom.  Work and motivation , 1964 .

[29]  K. Law,et al.  High-Performance Human Resource Practices, Citizenship Behavior, and Organizational Performance: A Relational Perspective , 2007 .

[30]  Albert V. Carron,et al.  Group dynamics in sport , 2005 .

[31]  Rick D. Hackett,et al.  Individual-Level Cultural Values as Moderators of Perceived Organizational Support–Employee Outcome Relationships in China: Comparing the Effects of Power Distance and Traditionality , 2007 .

[32]  D. Beal,et al.  Cohesion and performance in groups: a meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[33]  Frank Ostroff,et al.  The horizontal organization , 1999 .

[34]  Stephen J. Zaccaro,et al.  The Effects of Group Cohesion and Leader Behavior on Subordinate Satisfaction , 1986 .

[35]  Nathan Bennett,et al.  Cohesiveness and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Multilevel Analysis Using Work Groups and Individuals , 1997 .

[36]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  The Social Psychology of Group Cohesiveness: From Attraction to Social Identity , 1992 .

[37]  K. M. Bartol,et al.  Empowering Leadership in Management Teams: Effects on Knowledge Sharing, Efficacy, And Performance , 2006 .

[38]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  A disagreement about within-group agreement: Disentangling issues of consistency versus consensus. , 1992 .

[39]  T. L. Wright,et al.  Attraction To Group, Group Cohesiveness, and Individual Outcome , 1986 .

[40]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  The Moderating Role of Top Management Team Interdependence: Implications for Real Teams and Working Groups , 2007 .

[41]  David W. Johnson,et al.  The effects of attitude similarity, expectation of goal facilitation, and actual goal facilitation on interpersonal attraction , 1972 .

[42]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[43]  R. Saavedra,et al.  Complex interdependence in task-performing groups , 1993 .

[44]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[45]  Daniel J. Brass.  Structural Relationships, Job Characteristics, and Worker Satisfaction and Performance. , 1981 .

[46]  D. Hofmann.  An Overview of the Logic and Rationale of Hierarchical Linear Models , 1997 .

[47]  Gina J. Medsker,et al.  RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK GROUP CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: IMPLICATIONS FOR DESIGNING EFFECTIVE WORK GROUPS , 1993 .

[48]  G. Northcraft,et al.  You have printed the following article : Why Differences Make a Difference : A Field Study of Diversity , Conflict , and Performance in Workgroups , 2007 .

[49]  R. Wageman.  Interdependence and Group Effectiveness , 1995 .

[50]  Stephen Soldz,et al.  What is Cohesiveness? , 1993 .

[51]  L. Weingart,et al.  Group goals and group performance , 1993 .

[52]  J. Stokes,et al.  Toward an understanding of cohesion in personal change groups. , 1983, International journal of group psychotherapy.

[53]  David A. Hofmann,et al.  Centering Decisions in Hierarchical Linear Models: Implications for Research in Organizations , 1998 .

[54]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Relational correlates of interpersonal citizenship behavior: a social network perspective. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[55]  Hwee Hoon,et al.  Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Social Loafing: The Role of Personality, Motives, and Contextual Factors , 2008, The Journal of psychology.

[56]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[57]  G. V. D. Vegt,et al.  Informational Dissimilarity and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Role of Intrateam Interdependence and Team Identification , 2003 .

[58]  Mel Schnake,et al.  Levels of measurement and analysis issues in organizational citizenship behaviour research , 2003 .

[59]  M. Deutsch.  An Experimental Study of the Effects of Co-Operation and Competition upon Group Process , 1949 .

[60]  Brent A. Scott,et al.  The Interactive Effects of Personal Traits and Experienced States on Intraindividual Patterns of Citizenship Behavior , 2006 .

[61]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[62]  T. Mitchell,et al.  Individual and group goals when workers are interdependent: Effects on task strategies and performance. , 1990 .

[63]  Peter A. Bamberger,et al.  Diversity and Homophily at Work: Supportive Relations Among White and African-American Peers , 2004 .

[64]  Richard L. Griffith,et al.  Structural interdependence, personality, and organizational citizenship behavior , 2005 .

[65]  Gina J. Medsker,et al.  RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK TEAM CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: A REPLICATION AND EXTENSION , 1996 .

[66]  Laurie R. Weingart,et al.  Processes That Mediate the Relationship Between a Group Goal and Group Member Performance , 1991 .

[67]  E. Gross,et al.  Primary Functions of the Small Group , 1954, American Journal of Sociology.

[68]  Harold Guetzkow,et al.  A social psychological study of the decision-making conference. , 1951 .