Electronic and film portal images: a comparison of landmark visibility and review accuracy.

PURPOSE To quantitatively compare a scanning liquid ion chamber electronic portal imaging device (SLIC-EPID) and an amorphous silicon flat panel (aSi) EPID with portal film in clinical applications using measures of landmark visibility and treatment review accuracy. METHODS AND MATERIALS Six radiation oncologists viewed 39 electronic portal images (EPIs) from the SLIC-EPID, 36 EPIs from the aSi-EPID, and portal films of each of these treatment fields. The physicians rated the clarity of anatomic landmarks in the portal images, and the scores were compared between EPID and film. Nine hundred portal image reviews were performed. EPID and film portal images were acquired with known setup errors in either phantom or cadaver treatments. Physicians identified the errors visually in portal films and with computerized analysis for EPID. RESULTS There were no statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences between film and SLIC-EPID in ratings of landmark clarity. Eleven of 12 landmarks were more visible in aSi-EPID than in film. Translational setup errors were identified with an average accuracy of 2.5 mm in film, compared to 1.5 mm with SLIC-EPID and 1.3 mm with aSi-EPID. CONCLUSIONS Both EPIDs are clinically viable replacements for film, but aSi-EPID represents a significant advancement in image quality over film.

[1]  Michael G. Herman,et al.  58 Effects of respiration on target and critical structure positions during treatment assessed with movie-loop electronic portal imaging , 1997 .

[2]  P. Dunscombe,et al.  Radiotherapy portal verification: an observer study. , 1995, The British journal of radiology.

[3]  G T Chen,et al.  Online repositioning during treatment of the prostate: a study of potential limits and gains. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  D. Gladstone,et al.  A numerical simulation of organ motion and daily setup uncertainties: implications for radiation therapy. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  M Goitein,et al.  Immobilization error: some theoretical considerations. , 1975, Radiology.

[6]  J Pouliot,et al.  Observation study of electronic portal images for off-line verification. , 2000, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[7]  M van Herk,et al.  A matrix ionisation chamber imaging device for on-line patient setup verification during radiotherapy. , 1988, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[8]  T E Schultheiss,et al.  Intra- and interfractional reproducibility of tangential breast fields: a prospective on-line portal imaging study. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  A G Visser,et al.  Quality assurance using portal imaging: the accuracy of patient positioning in irradiation of breast cancer. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  Michael G. Herman,et al.  CLINICAL USE OF ON-LINE PORTAL IMAGING FOR DAILY PATIENT TREATMENT VERIFICATION , 1994 .

[11]  J Yorkston,et al.  Megavoltage imaging with a large-area, flat-panel, amorphous silicon imager. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  A G Haus,et al.  The value of frequent treatment verification films in reducing localization error in the irradiation of complex fields , 1976, Cancer.

[13]  J. Cox,et al.  Weekly localization films and detection of field placement errors. , 1978, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  Michael G. Herman,et al.  Guide to clinical use of electronic portal imaging , 2000, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[15]  J. W. Epstein,et al.  Development of a second-generation fiber-optic on-line image verification system. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  R K Valicenti,et al.  Is weekly port filming adequate for verifying patient position in modern radiation therapy? , 1994, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  D Verellen,et al.  Interactive use of on-line portal imaging in pelvic radiation. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  K Hatherly,et al.  A comparison of field-only electronic portal imaging hard copies with double exposure port films in radiation therapy treatment setup confirmation to determine its clinical application in a radiotherapy center. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  M van Herk,et al.  First clinical experience with a newly developed electronic portal imaging device. , 1990, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  J Moseley,et al.  Subjectivity in interpretation of portal films. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  A Fenster,et al.  A digital fluoroscopic imaging device for radiotherapy localization. , 1990, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  J Wong,et al.  Prospective clinical evaluation of an electronic portal imaging device. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  A Fenster,et al.  Therapy imaging: a signal-to-noise analysis of a fluoroscopic imaging system for radiotherapy localization. , 1990, Medical physics.

[24]  D. Nelson,et al.  An observer study for direct comparison of clinical efficacy of electronic to film portal images. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[25]  P. Munro,et al.  A review of electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs). , 1992, Medical physics.

[26]  B. Fallone,et al.  Preliminary study of a metal/a-Se-based portal detector. , 1998, Medical physics.

[27]  J. Leong,et al.  Use of digital fluoroscopy as an on-line verification device in radiation therapy. , 1986, Physics in medicine and biology.

[28]  M van Herk,et al.  A verification procedure to improve patient set-up accuracy using portal images. , 1993, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[29]  A Fenster,et al.  Daily monitoring and correction of radiation field placement using a video-based portal imaging system: a pilot study. , 1992, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[30]  A G Visser,et al.  Performance of a prototype fluoroscopic radiotherapy imaging system. , 1990, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.