Context. Animal movements recorded by radio-telemetry produce a series of spatio-temporal point-location estimates that sample an animal’s continuous track. However, uncertainty in the point locations themselves, and uncertainty of how the animal moved between locations, could be large enough to render data unsuitable for some purposes. Aims. Our objective was to develop a method that would visualise these uncertainties by calculating the maximum range of possible movements around the sampled point locations, given different probabilities of point-location error and animal-movement speed. By visualising the uncertainties, we hope to aid better study design. Methods. To quantify the probability of different levels of uncertainty, we use a probability density function (PDF) of point-location error and movement speed. By choosing a cut-off probability on each PDF, ellipses can be drawn for consecutive pairs of point-location estimates, which when combined show the maximum range of possible movements at those specific cut-off probabilities of location error and movement speed. We demonstrate how to establish the PDFs and apply the methodology by using an example of grizzly bear (Ursus arctos) radio-telemetry data. Key results. By establishing a range of probability cut-offs within each PDF, it is possible to visualise the area within which a grizzly bear could have moved under different combinations of those cut-offs. Conclusions. Comparison of the potential maximum range of possible movements, under different combinations of probability cut-offs, enables the relative importance of each source of uncertainty to be evaluated. Acquiring data from intense sampling would be particularly useful in providing robust information on likely movement speeds. Implications. This approach could be used during study design and testing to prioritise efforts towards reducing uncertainty in the point-location estimates, and uncertainty of where the animal moved between locations to ensure the radio-telemetry method used is appropriate for the study’s objectives.
[1]
O. Ovaskainen,et al.
State-space models of individual animal movement.
,
2008,
Trends in ecology & evolution.
[2]
Arthur R. Rodgers,et al.
Recent Telemetry Technology
,
2001
.
[3]
Lee A. Vierling,et al.
Effects of habitat on GPS collar performance: using data screening to reduce location error
,
2007
.
[4]
Tim Wark,et al.
Using high fix rate GPS data to determine the relationships between fix rate, prediction errors and patch selection
,
2008
.
[5]
J. Squires,et al.
Effect of forest canopy on GPS-based movement data
,
2005
.
[6]
S. Côté,et al.
Quantification and Accuracy of Activity Data Measured with VHF and GPS Telemetry
,
2006
.
[7]
Darcy R. Visscher,et al.
GPS measurement error and resource selection functions in a fragmented landscape
,
2006
.
[8]
John M. Marzluff,et al.
Effects of Tagging and Location Error in Wildlife Radiotelemetry Studies
,
2001
.
[9]
Robert E. Kenward,et al.
A manual for wildlife radio tagging
,
2000
.
[10]
Richard M. Pace,et al.
Estimating and Visualizing Movement Paths from Radio-Tracking Data
,
2001
.
[11]
David Ganskopp,et al.
GPS Error in Studies Addressing Animal Movements and Activities
,
2007
.
[12]
Ying Guo,et al.
Using accelerometer, high sample rate GPS and magnetometer data to develop a cattle movement and behaviour model
,
2009
.
[13]
Russell V. Lenth,et al.
On Finding the Source of a Signal
,
1981
.