A modified direct method for void fraction calculation in CFD–DEM simulations

Abstract The void fraction of computational cells in numerical simulations of particulate flows using computational fluid dynamics–discrete element method (CFD–DEM) is often directly (or crudely) calculated assuming that the entire body of a particle lies in the cell at which the particle centroid resides. This direct method is most inexpensive but inaccurate and may lead to simulation instabilities. In this study, a modified version of the direct method has been proposed. In this method, referred to as the particle meshing method (PMM), the particle is meshed and the solid volume in a fluid cell is calculated by adding up the particle mesh volume with the basic working principle being the same as that of the direct method. As a result, the PMM inherits the simplicity and hence the computational advantage from the direct method, whilst allowing for duplicating the particle shape and accurate accounting of particle volume in each fluid cell. The numerical simulation characteristics of PMM including numerical stability, minimum particle grid number, prediction accuracy, and computational efficiency have been examined. The results showed that for a specific cell-to-particle size ratio, there was a minimum particle grid number required to reach the stable simulation. A formula of estimating the minimum particle grid number was derived and discussed. Typically, a particle grid number of about 5 times the minimum number was suggested to achieve the best computational efficiency, which was comparable or even higher than that of simulations using the analytical approach. PMM also exhibited the potential to be applied for complex computational domain geometries and irregular shaped particles.

[1]  Abdallah S. Berrouk,et al.  Accurate void fraction calculation for three-dimensional discrete particle model on unstructured mesh , 2009 .

[2]  Aibing Yu,et al.  Computational investigation of horizontal slug flow in pneumatic conveying , 2008 .

[3]  Aibing Yu,et al.  A new point-locating algorithm under three-dimensional hybrid meshes , 2008 .

[4]  Nan Gui,et al.  DEM–LES study of 3-D bubbling fluidized bed with immersed tubes , 2008 .

[5]  A. Yu,et al.  Rolling friction in the dynamic simulation of sandpile formation , 1999 .

[6]  Hassan Abbas Khawaja,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Accuracy of Voidage Computations in CFD-DEM Simulations , 2012 .

[7]  Carl Wassgren,et al.  An exact method for determining local solid fractions in discrete element method simulations , 2010 .

[8]  P. Cleary,et al.  Dynamics of gas–solid fluidised beds with non-spherical particle geometry , 2010 .

[9]  Ng Niels Deen,et al.  Review of discrete particle modeling of fluidized beds , 2007 .

[10]  Jie Ouyang,et al.  Use of compromise-based local porosities for coarse grid DEM simulation of bubbling fluidized bed with large particles , 2013 .

[11]  Jian Fei Chen,et al.  Assessment of rolling resistance models in discrete element simulations , 2011 .

[12]  Heng Xiao,et al.  Algorithms in a Robust Hybrid CFD-DEM Solver for Particle-Laden Flows , 2011, Communications in Computational Physics.

[13]  David Eberly,et al.  Quaternion Algebra and Calculus , 2002 .

[14]  Aibing Yu,et al.  Numerical simulation of the gas-solid flow in a fluidized bed by combining discrete particle method with computational fluid dynamics , 1997 .

[15]  Daniel J. Holland,et al.  Novel fluid grid and voidage calculation techniques for a discrete element model of a 3D cylindrical fluidized bed , 2014, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[16]  Abdallah S. Berrouk,et al.  Three-dimensional discrete particle model for gas–solid fluidized beds on unstructured mesh , 2009 .

[17]  Rajamani Krishna,et al.  Experimental validation of Lagrangian-Eulerian simulations of fluidized beds , 2001 .

[18]  Aibing Yu,et al.  Discrete element simulation for pneumatic conveying of granular material , 2006 .

[19]  G. Guiochon,et al.  Coupled discrete element and finite volume solution of two classical soil mechanics problems , 2011 .

[20]  Behdad Moghtaderi,et al.  Forces acting on a single introduced particle in a solid-liquid fluidised bed , 2014 .

[21]  Francine Battaglia,et al.  Hybrid Two-Fluid DEM Simulation of Gas-Solid Fluidized Beds , 2006 .

[22]  Filip Johnsson,et al.  Characterization of fluid dynamics of fluidized beds by analysis of pressure fluctuations , 2007 .

[23]  Y. Tsuji,et al.  Discrete particle simulation of two-dimensional fluidized bed , 1993 .

[24]  Jam Hans Kuipers,et al.  Flow regimes in a spout-fluid bed : A combined experimental and simulation study , 2005 .

[25]  Andrew Hobbs,et al.  Simulation of an aggregate dryer using coupled CFD and DEM methods , 2009 .

[26]  Yusif A. Alghamdi,et al.  Mixing and segregation of solid mixtures in bubbling fluidized beds under conditions pertinent to the fuel reactor of a chemical looping system , 2013 .

[27]  Per-Olof Persson,et al.  A Simple Mesh Generator in MATLAB , 2004, SIAM Rev..

[28]  R. L. Braun,et al.  Viscosity, granular‐temperature, and stress calculations for shearing assemblies of inelastic, frictional disks , 1986 .

[29]  Christophe Geuzaine,et al.  Gmsh: A 3‐D finite element mesh generator with built‐in pre‐ and post‐processing facilities , 2009 .

[30]  T. B. Anderson,et al.  Fluid Mechanical Description of Fluidized Beds. Equations of Motion , 1967 .

[31]  G. Grest,et al.  Granular flow down an inclined plane: Bagnold scaling and rheology. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[32]  M. Adams,et al.  Discrete particle-continuum fluid modelling of gas–solid fluidised beds , 2002 .

[33]  Behdad Moghtaderi,et al.  Influence of void fraction calculation on fidelity of CFD-DEM simulation of gas-solid bubbling fluidized beds , 2014 .

[34]  P. Cundall,et al.  A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies , 1979 .