Defect classification based on rectangular pulsed eddy current sensor in different directions

Pulsed eddy current (PEC) testing is a new emerging and effective electromagnetic non-destructive testing (NDT) technique. The main purpose of this study is to identify surface defects and sub-surface defects using features-based rectangular pulsed eddy current sensor. The further study of PEC rectangular sensor proposed in author's previous work has been made to classify the different types of defects in specimen. In different directions of sensor scanning, peak waves of pick-up coil are studied. We find that when sensor is on different position against the defect, peak waves of response signals present the same shape in direction of magnetic induction flux, while present different shapes in direction of exciting current. Experiment results have shown that the different classes of defects can be identified and classified effectively by selecting the rising time as the time domain feature in both directions. For improving the performance of defect classification, two new features from differential response signal are proposed to classify different types of defects combined with rising time. One is called as crossing time; the other is differential time to peak. The blind test is carried out and the results show that the new features are effective to classify the defects.

[1]  Gui Yun Tian,et al.  DEFECT CLASSIFICATION USING A NEW FEATURE FOR PULSED EDDY CURRENT SENSORS , 2005 .

[2]  James H. Rose,et al.  Pulsed eddy-current characterization of corrosion in aircraft lap splices: quantitative modeling , 1994, Photonics West - Lasers and Applications in Science and Engineering.

[3]  Huang Songling,et al.  Development of differential probes in pulsed eddy current testing for noise suppression , 2007 .

[4]  J. Rudlin,et al.  Multiple sensors on pulsed eddy-current detection for 3-D subsurface crack assessment , 2005, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[5]  Feilu Luo,et al.  Pulsed eddy current technique used for non-destructive inspection of ageing aircraft , 2006 .

[6]  Robert A. Smith,et al.  Transient eddy-current NDE for ageing aircraft - Capabilities and limitations. , 2001 .

[7]  Gui Yun Tian,et al.  Wavelet-based PCA defect classification and quantification for pulsed eddy current NDT , 2005 .

[8]  Gui Yun Tian,et al.  Feature extraction and selection for defect classification of pulsed eddy current NDT , 2008 .

[9]  C. Mandache,et al.  Study of Lift-Off Invariance for Pulsed Eddy-Current Signals , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[10]  J. M. S. Dubois,et al.  Pulsed Eddy Current Technology: Characterizing Material Loss with Gap and Lift-off Variations , 2001 .

[11]  Junzhe Gao,et al.  Defect identification and evaluation based on three-dimensional magnetic field measurement of pulsed eddy current , 2009 .

[12]  Li Shu,et al.  Study of pulse eddy current probes detecting cracks extending in all directions , 2008 .

[13]  Gui Yun Tian,et al.  A FEATURE EXTRACTION TECHNIQUE BASED ON PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS FOR PULSED EDDY CURRENT NDT , 2003 .

[14]  James H. Rose,et al.  Scanned pulsed eddy current instrument for nondestructive inspection of aging aircraft , 1996, Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[15]  Han Dan,et al.  Research on edge identification of a defect using pulsed eddy current based on principal component analysis , 2007 .

[16]  Binfeng Yang,et al.  QUANTIFICATION AND CLASSIFICATION OF CRACKS IN AIRCRAFT MULTI-LAYERED STRUCTURE , 2006 .