A random effect autologistic regression model with application to the characterization of multiple microstructure samples

ABSTRACT The microstructure of a material can strongly influence its properties such as strength, hardness, wear resistance, etc., which in turn play an important role in the quality of products produced from these materials. Existing studies on a material's microstructure have mainly focused on the characteristics of a single microstructure sample and the variation between different microstructure samples is ignored. In this article, we propose a novel random effect autologistic regression model that can be used to characterize the variation in microstructures between different samples for two-phase materials that consist of two distinct parts with different chemical structures. The proposed model differs from the classic autologistic regression model in that we consider the unit-to-unit variability among the microstructure samples, which is characterized by the random effect parameters. To estimate the model parameters given a set of microstructure samples, we first derive a likelihood function, based on which a maximum likelihood estimation method is developed. However, maximizing the likelihood function of the proposed model is generally difficult as it has a complex form. To overcome this challenge, we further develop a stochastic approximation expectation maximization algorithm to estimate the model parameters. A simulation study is conducted to verify the proposed methodology. A real-world example of a dual-phase high strength steel is used to illustrate the developed methods.

[1]  F. Stillinger,et al.  Modeling heterogeneous materials via two-point correlation functions: basic principles. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[2]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Markov Random Field Texture Models , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[3]  John J. Lewandowski,et al.  Effects of matrix microstructure and particle distribution on fracture of an aluminum metal matrix composite , 1989 .

[4]  Jeff A. Bilmes,et al.  A gentle tutorial of the em algorithm and its application to parameter estimation for Gaussian mixture and hidden Markov models , 1998 .

[5]  D. Raabe,et al.  Relation between microstructure and mechanical properties of a low-alloyed TRIP steel , 2004 .

[6]  N. Tsuji,et al.  Microstructure homogeneity in various metallic materials heavily deformed by accumulative roll-bonding , 2006 .

[7]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[8]  Surajit Kumar Paul,et al.  Real microstructure based micromechanical model to simulate microstructural level deformation behavior and failure initiation in DP 590 steel , 2013 .

[9]  Mike Rees,et al.  5. Statistics for Spatial Data , 1993 .

[10]  Hulin Wu,et al.  Markov chain Monte Carlo for autologistic regression models with application to the distribution of plant species , 1998 .

[11]  A. Karimi Taheri,et al.  Effect of forging temperature on homogeneity of microstructure and hardness of precision forged steel spur gear , 2008 .

[12]  Amid,et al.  HOMOGENIZATION RELATIONS FOR ELASTIC PROPERTIES OF TWO-PHASE COMPOSITES USING TWO-POINT STATISTICAL FUNCTIONS , 2008 .

[13]  S. Torquato Random Heterogeneous Materials , 2002 .

[14]  Jonathan M. Graham,et al.  AUTOLOGISTIC MODEL OF SPATIAL PATTERN OF PHYTOPHTHORA EPIDEMIC IN BELL PEPPER: EFFECTS OF SOIL VARIABLES ONDISEASE PRESENCE , 1994 .

[15]  Murali Haran,et al.  Autologistic models for binary data on a lattice , 2011 .

[16]  S. Torquato,et al.  Random Heterogeneous Materials: Microstructure and Macroscopic Properties , 2005 .

[17]  S. Chib,et al.  Understanding the Metropolis-Hastings Algorithm , 1995 .

[18]  S. Torquato,et al.  Microstructural degeneracy associated with a two-point correlation function and its information content. , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[19]  Mircea Grigoriu,et al.  Random field models for two-phase microstructures , 2003 .

[20]  Martin Ostoja-Starzewski,et al.  Microstructural Randomness Versus Representative Volume Element in Thermomechanics , 2002 .

[21]  New York Dover,et al.  ON THE CONVERGENCE PROPERTIES OF THE EM ALGORITHM , 1983 .

[22]  D. Owen,et al.  Statistical reconstruction of two-phase random media , 2014 .

[23]  Gary J. Russell,et al.  Predicting Product Purchase from Inferred Customer Similarity: An Autologistic Model Approach , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[24]  Noel A. C. Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data: Cressie/Statistics , 1993 .

[25]  André I. Khuri,et al.  Linear Model Methodology , 2009 .

[26]  É. Moulines,et al.  Convergence of a stochastic approximation version of the EM algorithm , 1999 .

[27]  Marc Lavielle,et al.  Mixed Effects Models for the Population Approach: Models, Tasks, Methods and Tools , 2014 .

[28]  Klaus Nordhausen,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, Second Edition by Trevor Hastie, Robert Tibshirani, Jerome Friedman , 2009 .

[29]  Ahmet T. Alpas,et al.  Effect of microstructure (particulate size and volume fraction) and counterface material on the sliding wear resistance of particulate-reinforced aluminum matrix composites , 1994 .