Conditional cooperation can hinder network reciprocity

Social networks are ubiquitous in our internet-dominated culture, and the new virtual social networks have a lot in common with traditional social networks (e.g., friends and colleagues). In all cases, it is important who interacts with whom. Lately, there has been much theoretical and empirical work on how the behavior of individuals can be influenced by their social ties and how ties are distributed within a network. Theoretical findings of the effects of such population structures on cooperative behavior in humans have been inconsistent (1⇓⇓–4), and empirical tests have lacked—from a theoretical point of view—sufficient system sizes. Gracia-Lazaro et al. (5) have now conducted an impressively large-scaled experiment of 1,229 humans simultaneously playing a prisoner’s dilemma in two different network environments. Specifically, they test whether homogenous or heterogeneous networks—both static environments—influence cooperative behavior (Fig. 1).

[1]  Alessandra Cassar,et al.  Coordination and Cooperation in Local, Random and Small World Networks: Experimental Evidence , 2002, Games Econ. Behav..

[2]  J Gómez-Gardeñes,et al.  Dynamical organization of cooperation in complex topologies. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[3]  Ángel Sánchez,et al.  Effect of spatial structure on the evolution of cooperation , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[4]  David G. Rand,et al.  Dynamic social networks promote cooperation in experiments with humans , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Rosemarie Nagel,et al.  Naive learning and cooperation in network experiments , 2007, Games Econ. Behav..

[6]  Lourdes Araujo,et al.  Social Experiments in the Mesoscale: Humans Playing a Spatial Prisoner's Dilemma , 2010, PloS one.

[7]  Arne Traulsen,et al.  Human strategy updating in evolutionary games , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  J. Fewell Social Insect Networks , 2003, Science.

[9]  Ángel Sánchez,et al.  Human behavior in Prisoner's Dilemma experiments suppresses network reciprocity , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[10]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics on graphs , 2005, Nature.

[11]  Michael Doebeli,et al.  Spatial structure often inhibits the evolution of cooperation in the snowdrift game , 2004, Nature.

[12]  David Lusseau,et al.  The emergent properties of a dolphin social network , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolutionary games and spatial chaos , 1992, Nature.

[14]  Katrin Fehl,et al.  Co-evolution of behaviour and social network structure promotes human cooperation. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[15]  Bernhard Voelkl,et al.  Social structure of primate interaction networks facilitates the emergence of cooperation , 2009, Biology Letters.

[16]  E. Fehr,et al.  Altruistic punishment in humans , 2002, Nature.

[17]  Gueorgi Kossinets,et al.  Empirical Analysis of an Evolving Social Network , 2006, Science.

[18]  J. Cuesta,et al.  Heterogeneous networks do not promote cooperation when humans play a Prisoner’s Dilemma , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  R. Connor,et al.  Exploring Animal Social Networks, D.P. Croft, R. James, J. Krause. Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press (2008), Pp. viii+192. Price $35.00 paperback , 2009 .

[20]  Michael Doebeli,et al.  A simple and general explanation for the evolution of altruism , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  Margarita Ifti,et al.  Effects of neighbourhood size and connectivity on the spatial Continuous Prisoner's Dilemma. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[22]  F. C. Santos,et al.  Scale-free networks provide a unifying framework for the emergence of cooperation. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[23]  F. C. Santos,et al.  A new route to the evolution of cooperation , 2006, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[24]  Martin A Nowak,et al.  Spatial invasion of cooperation. , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.

[25]  M. Milinski,et al.  Reputation helps solve the ‘tragedy of the commons’ , 2002, Nature.

[26]  H. Ohtsuki,et al.  A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks , 2006, Nature.

[27]  M. Nowak,et al.  Non-commercial Research and Educational Use including without Limitation Use in Instruction at Your Institution, Sending It to Specific Colleagues That You Know, and Providing a Copy to Your Institution's Administrator. All Other Uses, Reproduction and Distribution, including without Limitation Comm , 2022 .

[28]  Ángel Sánchez,et al.  Evolutionary game theory: Temporal and spatial effects beyond replicator dynamics , 2009, Physics of life reviews.

[29]  Brauchli,et al.  Evolution of cooperation in spatially structured populations , 1999, Journal of theoretical biology.