Life cycle assessment of the Danish electricity distribution network

PurposeThis article provides life cycle inventory data for electricity distribution networks and a life cycle assessment (LCA) of the Danish transmission and distribution networks. The aim of the study was to evaluate the potential importance of environmental impacts associated with distribution, in current and future electricity systems.MethodsThe functional unit was delivery of 1 kWh of electricity in Denmark. The focus of the assessment was distribution of electricity, and the related impacts were compared to the generation and transmission of electricity, in order to evaluate the importance of electricity distribution in Denmark. The 2010 Danish electricity distribution network was modeled, including power lines (50, 10, 0.4 kV), transformers (50/10 and 10/0.4 kV), and relevant auxiliary infrastructure (e.g., cable ditches, poles, and substations). Two types of 50 kV power lines (underground and overhead) and 0.4 kV (copper and aluminum) were modeled.Results and discussionElectricity transmission and distribution provided nonnegligible impacts, related mainly to power losses. Impacts from electricity distribution were larger than those from transmission because of higher losses and higher complexity and material consumption. Infrastructure provided important contributions to metal depletion and freshwater eutrophication (copper and aluminum for manufacturing of the cables and associated recycling being the most important). Underground 50-kV lines had larger impacts than overhead lines, and 0.4-kV aluminum lines had lower impacts than comparable copper lines.ConclusionsA new specific dataset for infrastructure in the distribution network was provided and used to evaluate the role of electricity distribution in Denmark. Both transmission and distribution provided nonnegligible impacts. It was argued that the impacts from electricity distribution are likely to increase in the future, owing to more renewables and decentralized electricity generation, and that impacts from infrastructure may become significant compared to electricity generation itself. It was recommended that impacts from electricity distribution and related infrastructure are included in relevant LCA studies. The data provided here make this possible.

[1]  Aie Electricity Information 2010 , 2010 .

[2]  Christopher A. Bolin,et al.  Life cycle assessment of pentachlorophenol-treated wooden utility poles with comparisons to steel and concrete utility poles , 2011 .

[3]  Yohji Uchiyama,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of electricity generation options: The status of research in year 2001 , 2002 .

[4]  Edgar G. Hertwich,et al.  Life cycle assessment of electricity transmission and distribution—part 2: transformers and substation equipment , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[5]  Daniel Weisser,et al.  A guide to life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from electric supply technologies , 2007 .

[6]  Dimitrios A. Georgakellos,et al.  Climate change external cost appraisal of electricity generation systems from a life cycle perspective: the case of Greece. , 2012 .

[7]  Roberto Turconi,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) of electricity generation technologies: Overview, comparability and limitations , 2013 .

[8]  Eric Hirst Electricity end-use efficiency : by International Energy Agency International Energy Agency, Paris, 1989, 200 pp , 1990 .

[9]  Craig I. Jones,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of 11 kV electrical overhead lines and underground cables , 2010 .

[10]  Luis F. Ochoa,et al.  Life cycle assessment of the transmission network in Great Britain , 2010 .

[11]  Edgar G. Hertwich,et al.  Life cycle assessment of electricity transmission and distribution—part 1: power lines and cables , 2011, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[12]  Edgar G. Hertwich,et al.  Environmental evaluation of power transmission in Norway , 2013 .

[13]  Davide Tonini,et al.  LCA of biomass-based energy systems: A case study for Denmark , 2012 .

[14]  Roland Geyer,et al.  Life cycle assessment of overhead and underground primary power distribution. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.