Video and robotic-assisted minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a comparison of the Port-Access and transthoracic clamp techniques.

BACKGROUND In order to assess different surgical techniques for video-assisted minimally invasive mitral valve surgery, a retrospective study was undertaken comparing the Port-Access system (Cardiovations, Ethicon Inc, Somerville, NJ) and the transthoracic clamp technique. METHODS In 120 patients mitral valve surgery was performed through a small right minithoracotomy using either the Port-Access endovascular cardiopulmonary bypass system (Port-Access, n = 60) or the transthoracic clamp technique (MICRO, n = 60). Mean patient age was 61.5 +/- 10.5 years (81 patients with isolated mitral valve insufficiency, 39 patients with combined mitral valve disease). RESULTS Eighty-one (67.5%) patients underwent mitral valve repair and 39 (32.5%) patients had valve replacement. Mean time of surgery was 4.5 +/- 3.5 and 4.1 +/- 3.2 hours (p = 0.07), aortic cross-clamp time 89 +/- 69 and 78 +/- 65 minutes (p = 0.08), mean intensive care unit stay 1.5 +/- 2.1 and 1.6 +/- 2.5 days (p = ns), and hospital stay 9.0 +/- 10.5 and 9.2 +/- 9.7 days (p = ns) in the Port-Access and MICRO groups, respectively. In the Port-Access group, there were 6 reexplorations for bleeding, one perforation of the right ventricle with the endopulmonary vent, and 2 reconstructions of the femoral artery necessary after femoral cannulation, compared to one reexploration for bleeding in the MICRO group. There was only one minor paravalvular leak after replacement and 2 cases of residual greater than or equal to grade II mitral valve regurgitation after mitral valve repair in the Port-Access group, necessitating reoperation. In both groups, there was no mortality, no cerebrovascular accident, no aortic dissection, and no conversion to sternotomy. CONCLUSIONS Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery has become a standard approach for isolated mitral valve operations at our institution. The MICRO technique tends to shorten the time of surgery and aortic cross-clamping and reduces perioperative costs by simplifying the operative procedure.

[1]  W. Daniel,et al.  Port-Access coronary artery bypass grafting with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest. , 1998, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[2]  H. Vanermen,et al.  Minimally invasive video-assisted mitral valve surgery: our lessons after a 4-year experience. , 2001, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[3]  D. Cosgrove,et al.  Minimally invasive mitral valve operations. , 1996, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[4]  T Walther,et al.  Pain and quality of life after minimally invasive versus conventional cardiac surgery. , 1999, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[5]  F. Casselman,et al.  Mitral Valve Surgery Can Now Routinely Be Performed Endoscopically , 2003, Circulation.

[6]  C Detter,et al.  Three-dimensional video and robot-assisted port-access mitral valve operation. , 2000, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[7]  F. Mohr,et al.  Five years of less invasive mitral valve surgery: from experimental to routine approach. , 2002, The heart surgery forum.

[8]  F. Mohr,et al.  The evolution of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery 2 year experience 1 Presented at the 12th , 1999 .

[9]  S. Gundry,et al.  The Use of Transesophageal Echocardiography to Guide Sternal Division for Cardiac Operations Via Mini‐Sternotomy , 1997, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[10]  W. Chapman,et al.  Video-assisted minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. , 1997, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[11]  R. S. Mitchell,et al.  Port-access coronary artery bypass grafting: a proposed surgical method. , 1996, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[12]  H. Vanermen,et al.  Minimally Invasive Video‐Assisted Mitral Valve Surgery: From Port‐Access Towards a Totally Endoscopic Procedure , 2000, Journal of cardiac surgery.