Generalization of prior information for rapid Bayesian time estimation

Significance When sensory information is uncertain, humans rely on prior knowledge of the environment when making perceptual judgments and planning actions. Humans can rapidly learn new priors, but the rules governing how recent experiences are grouped together are unknown. Here, we show that observers initially form single priors by generalizing across distinct sensory signals but form multiple priors when they are coupled with different motor outputs. Thus, our results reveal that internal models of temporal statistics are initially organized not according to the nature of the sensory input but according to the way on which it is acted. To enable effective interaction with the environment, the brain combines noisy sensory information with expectations based on prior experience. There is ample evidence showing that humans can learn statistical regularities in sensory input and exploit this knowledge to improve perceptual decisions and actions. However, fundamental questions remain regarding how priors are learned and how they generalize to different sensory and behavioral contexts. In principle, maintaining a large set of highly specific priors may be inefficient and restrict the speed at which expectations can be formed and updated in response to changes in the environment. However, priors formed by generalizing across varying contexts may not be accurate. Here, we exploit rapidly induced contextual biases in duration reproduction to reveal how these competing demands are resolved during the early stages of prior acquisition. We show that observers initially form a single prior by generalizing across duration distributions coupled with distinct sensory signals. In contrast, they form multiple priors if distributions are coupled with distinct motor outputs. Together, our findings suggest that rapid prior acquisition is facilitated by generalization across experiences of different sensory inputs but organized according to how that sensory information is acted on.

[1]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  Rapidly learned stimulus expectations alter perception of motion. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[2]  Hugo L. Fernandes,et al.  Differential Representations of Prior and Likelihood Uncertainty in the Human Brain , 2012, Current Biology.

[3]  A. Yuille,et al.  Object perception as Bayesian inference. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[4]  Timothy D. Hanks,et al.  Neurobiology of decision making: An intentional framework , 2008 .

[5]  Wendy J. Adams,et al.  Learning different light prior distributions for different contexts , 2013, Cognition.

[6]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  Motion illusions as optimal percepts , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  József Fiser,et al.  Spontaneous Cortical Activity Reveals Hallmarks of an Optimal Internal Model of the Environment , 2011, Science.

[8]  Timothy D. Hanks,et al.  Neurobiology of Decision Making , 2008 .

[9]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Learning Priors for Bayesian Computations in the Nervous System , 2010, PloS one.

[10]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  ECVP '07 Abstracts , 2007, Perception.

[11]  F. Petzschner,et al.  Iterative Bayesian Estimation as an Explanation for Range and Regression Effects: A Study on Human Path Integration , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  Xue-Xin Wei,et al.  A Bayesian observer model constrained by efficient coding can explain 'anti-Bayesian' percepts , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  Paul Cisek,et al.  Cortical mechanisms of action selection: the affordance competition hypothesis , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  P. Berkes,et al.  Statistically Optimal Perception and Learning: from Behavior to Neural Representations , 2022 .

[15]  J. Gold,et al.  The neural basis of decision making. , 2007, Annual review of neuroscience.

[16]  Aude Oliva,et al.  Estimating perception of scene layout properties from global image features. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[17]  R M Church,et al.  Scalar Timing in Memory , 1984, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[18]  J. Kalaska,et al.  Neural mechanisms for interacting with a world full of action choices. , 2010, Annual review of neuroscience.

[19]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  Complexity and specificity of experimentally induced expectations in motion perception , 2013, BMC Neuroscience.

[20]  Michael Schwartze,et al.  Differential Input of the Supplementary Motor Area to a Dedicated Temporal Processing Network: Functional and Clinical Implications , 2011, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[21]  John Gibbon,et al.  Ubiquity of scalar timing with Poisson clock , 1992 .

[22]  S. McKee,et al.  The use of an implicit standard for measuring discrimination thresholds , 2000, Vision Research.

[23]  S. Kitazawa,et al.  Bayesian calibration of simultaneity in tactile temporal order judgment , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  Ulrik R. Beierholm,et al.  Fast and Accurate Learning When Making Discrete Numerical Estimates , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[25]  Michael S Landy,et al.  Combining Priors and Noisy Visual Cues in a Rapid Pointing Task , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning , 2004, Nature.

[27]  Ennio Mingolla,et al.  A computational study of brightness-related responses in visual cortex. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[28]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  Learning what to expect (in visual perception) , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[29]  F. Petzschner,et al.  A Bayesian perspective on magnitude estimation , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Review TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.10 No.7 July 2006 Special Issue: Probabilistic models of cognition Bayesian decision theory in sensorimotor control , 2022 .

[31]  M. Ernst,et al.  Experience can change the 'light-from-above' prior , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  D. Burr,et al.  Optimal Encoding of Interval Timing in Expert Percussionists , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  Luigi Acerbi,et al.  On the Origins of Suboptimality in Human Probabilistic Inference , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[34]  Luigi Acerbi,et al.  Internal Representations of Temporal Statistics and Feedback Calibrate Motor-Sensory Interval Timing , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[35]  R. Gregory The Most Expensive Painting in the World , 2007, Perception.

[36]  W. Meck,et al.  Neuroanatomical and Neurochemical Substrates of Timing , 2011, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[37]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[38]  Helga Lejeune,et al.  Vierordt's The Experimental Study of the Time Sense (1868) and its legacy , 2009 .

[39]  R. Andersen,et al.  Posterior Parietal Cortex Encodes Autonomously Selected Motor Plans , 2007, Neuron.

[40]  Stefan Glasauer,et al.  Combining Symbolic Cues with Sensory Input and Prior Experience in an Iterative Bayesian Framework , 2012, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[41]  W. Singer,et al.  Better than conscious? : decision making, the human mind, and implications for institutions , 2008 .

[42]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Cardinal rules: Visual orientation perception reflects knowledge of environmental statistics , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[43]  L. Pinneo On noise in the nervous system. , 1966, Psychological review.

[44]  D. Knill,et al.  The brain uses adaptive internal models of scene statistics for sensorimotor estimation and planning , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  Mehrdad Jazayeri,et al.  Representation of Accumulating Evidence for a Decision in Two Parietal Areas , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  Karl Vierordt,et al.  Der Zeitsinn nach Versuchen , 1868 .

[47]  Jun Tanji,et al.  Distribution of eye- and arm-movement-related neuronal activity in the SEF and in the SMA and Pre-SMA of monkeys. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[48]  Philip N. Sabes,et al.  How Each Movement Changes the Next: An Experimental and Theoretical Study of Fast Adaptive Priors in Reaching , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[49]  Anthony R. Dickinson,et al.  Non-spatial, motor-specific activation in posterior parietal cortex , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[50]  Michael N. Shadlen,et al.  Temporal context calibrates interval timing , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[51]  Sang-Hun Lee,et al.  Dichotomy in perceptual learning of interval timing: calibration of mean accuracy and precision differ in specificity and time course. , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[52]  Hugo Merchant,et al.  Interval Tuning in the Primate Medial Premotor Cortex as a General Timing Mechanism , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[53]  D. Knill,et al.  The Bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation , 2004, Trends in Neurosciences.

[54]  Hugo Merchant,et al.  Neural basis of the perception and estimation of time. , 2013, Annual review of neuroscience.

[55]  F. Urban The Central Tendency of Judgment. , 2022 .

[56]  Makoto Miyazaki,et al.  Acquisition of Multiple Prior Distributions in Tactile Temporal Order Judgment , 2012, Front. Psychology.