Automatic detection of epileptiform spikes in the electrocorticogram: a comparison of two algorithms

The detection and analysis of epileptiform spikes is of major importance for the presurgical evaluation of epilepsy patients concerning the localization of the epileptogenic zone. To examine the reliability of automatic spike detection software for intracranial subdural strip and intrahippocampal depth recordings, the results of two algorithms were compared with those of two human reviewers. The first is a newly developed two-stage algorithm whose first stage uses the enhanced prediction error of an updating linear predictor of the electrocorticogram (ECoG) to select candidates for the following mimetic rule-based system. The second system is the well-known rule-based algorithm developed by Gotman. Both systems achieved only a surprisingly small number of common detections (32 and 24%) accompanied by a high number of false detections (65 and 78%). Though the results were better for the first system, the clinical use of the automatic spike detection systems should be limited to the following purposes. 1. To achieve data reduction before visual inspection of the spike candidates. 2. To get an overview of the spatial distribution of spike counts. 3. To obtain a data basis for the analysis of quantitative spike parameters.

[1]  J. Gotman,et al.  Automatic recognition and quantification of interictal epileptic activity in the human scalp EEG. , 1976, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology.

[2]  S. Haykin.  Nonlinear Methods of Spectral Analysis , 1980 .

[3]  W T Blume,et al.  Morphology of spikes in spike-and-wave complexes. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[4]  Haruo Akimoto,et al.  Advances in epileptology : XIIIth Epilepsy International Symposium , 1982 .

[5]  D. Spencer,et al.  Comparison and correlation of surface and sphenoidal electrodes with simultaneous intracranial recording: an interictal study. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  S. Spencer,et al.  Depth electrodes. , 1992, Epilepsy research. Supplement.

[7]  J. Gotman,et al.  State dependent spike detection: validation. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  W R Webber,et al.  Practical detection of epileptiform discharges (EDs) in the EEG using an artificial neural network: a comparison of raw and parameterized EEG data. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[9]  C. Binnie,et al.  A glossary of terms most commonly used by clinical electroencephalographers. , 1974, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  A J Gabor,et al.  Automated interictal EEG spike detection using artificial neural networks. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  M Unser,et al.  Fast wavelet transformation of EEG. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  W E Hostetler,et al.  Assessment of a computer program to detect epileptiform spikes. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  J R Ives,et al.  Automatic recognition of inter-ictal epileptic activity in prolonged EEG recordings. , 1979, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[14]  Ilker Yaylali,et al.  Multilevel neural network system for EEG spike detection , 1991, [1991] Computer-Based Medical Systems@m_Proceedings of the Fourth Annual IEEE Symposium.

[15]  J Gotman,et al.  State-dependent spike detection: concepts and preliminary results. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[16]  Lars H. Zetterberg,et al.  CEAN-computerized EEG analysis , 1977 .